Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Clinical Trial
— Ellipseā¢Official title:
Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy on Glycaemic Control in Children and Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes
Verified date | July 2021 |
Source | Novo Nordisk A/S |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in the paediatric population in order to potentially address the unmet need for treatment of children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 135 |
Est. completion date | May 20, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | November 15, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 10 Years to 17 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Children and adolescents between the ages of 10-16 years. Subjects cannot turn 17 years and 11 months before the end of treatment (52 weeks) - Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and treated for at least 30 days with: diet and exercise alone, diet and exercise in combination with metformin monotherapy, diet and exercise in combination with metformin and a stable (Stable is defined as basal insulin adjustments up to 15%) dose of basal insulin, diet and exercise in combination with a stable (Stable is defined as basal insulin adjustments up to 15%) dose of basal insulin - HbA1c: 7.0-11% (inclusive) if diet and exercise treated or 6.5-11% (inclusive) if treated with metformin as monotherapy, basal insulin as monotherapy or metformin and basal insulin in combination - Body mass index (BMI) above 85% percentile of the general age and gender matched population Exclusion Criteria: - Type 1 diabetes - Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) - Use of any antidiabetic agent other than metformin and/or basal insulin within 90 days prior to screening - Recurrent severe hypoglycaemia or hypoglycaemic unawareness as judged by the investigator - History of chronic pancreatitis or idiopathic acute pancreatitis - Any clinically significant disorder, except for conditions associated with type 2 diabetes history which in the investigator's opinion could interfere with results of the trial - Uncontrolled hypertension, treated or untreated above 99th percentile for age and gender in children - Known or suspected abuse of alcohol or drugs/narcotics |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ipswich | Queensland |
Austria | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Graz | |
Austria | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Innsbruck | |
Austria | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Salzburg | |
Austria | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Wels | |
Belgium | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Brussel | |
Belgium | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bruxelles | |
Belgium | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Leuven | |
Brazil | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande Do Sul |
Canada | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Brampton | Ontario |
Canada | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Edmonton | Alberta |
Canada | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Westmount | Quebec |
Canada | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Winnipeg | Manitoba |
Croatia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Rijeka | |
Croatia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Zagreb | |
Denmark | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Herlev | |
Denmark | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Næstved | |
Egypt | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Alexandria | |
Egypt | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Cairo | |
Egypt | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Cairo | |
Egypt | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Mansoura | |
France | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Marseille | |
France | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | MONTPELLIER cedex 05 | |
Germany | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ludwigshafen | |
Germany | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Mayen | |
Greece | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Athens | |
Greece | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Athens | |
Greece | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Goudi/ Athens | |
Greece | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Thessaloniki | |
Hungary | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Budapest | |
Hungary | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Budapest | |
Hungary | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Budapest | |
Hungary | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Miskolc | |
Hungary | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Szombathely | |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bangalore | Karnataka |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bangalore | Karnataka |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bangalore | Karnataka |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bangalore | Karnataka |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Chandigarh | Punjab |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Chennai | Tamil Nadu |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Guntur | Andhra Pradesh |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hyderabad | Andhra Pradesh |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hyderbad | Telengana |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Jaipur | Rajasthan |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kolkata | West Bengal |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kolkata | |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ludhiana | Punjab |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Mumbai | Maharashtra |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Mumbai | Maharashtra |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | New Dehli | New Delhi |
India | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Pune | Maharashtra |
Israel | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Beer Sheva | |
Israel | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Haifa | |
Israel | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Jerusalem | |
Israel | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Petah Tikva | |
Israel | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tel Hashomer | |
Italy | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Roma | |
Lebanon | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hazmieh | |
Lebanon | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Lebanon - Beirut | |
Malaysia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kuala Lumpur | |
Mexico | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Puebla | |
Mexico | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tampico | Tamaulipas |
Morocco | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Fès | |
Morocco | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Rabat | |
Netherlands | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Den Bosch | |
New Zealand | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Grafton | |
North Macedonia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Skopje | |
Norway | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bergen | |
Poland | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Katowice | |
Poland | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Warszawa | |
Poland | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Wroclaw | |
Portugal | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Braga | |
Portugal | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Lisboa | |
Portugal | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Lisboa | |
Puerto Rico | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ponce | |
Romania | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bucharest | |
Romania | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bucharest | |
Romania | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Constanta | |
Romania | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Timisoara | Timis |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Chelyabinsk | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Izhevsk | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Krasnoyarsk | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Moscow | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Moscow | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Novosibirsk | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Saint-Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Saint-Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Saratov | |
Russian Federation | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tomsk | |
Serbia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Belgrade | |
Serbia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Belgrade | |
Serbia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Nis | |
Serbia | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Novi Sad | |
Spain | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Leganés | |
Spain | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Madrid | |
Spain | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Madrid | |
Spain | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Vigo | |
Spain | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Vitoria | |
Sweden | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Göteborg | |
Sweden | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Huddinge | |
Sweden | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Uppsala | |
Taiwan | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tainan city | |
Taiwan | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Taoyuan | |
Thailand | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bangkok | |
Thailand | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Chiang Mai | |
Turkey | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ankara | |
Turkey | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ankara | |
Turkey | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Istanbul | |
Turkey | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kocaeli | |
United Kingdom | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Birmingham | |
United Kingdom | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | London | |
United Kingdom | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Manchester | |
United Kingdom | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Norwich | |
United Kingdom | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Southampton | |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Amarillo | Texas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bloomington | Indiana |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Buffalo | New York |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Charleston | West Virginia |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Chattanooga | Tennessee |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Columbia | Missouri |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Columbus | Georgia |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Corona | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Costa Mesa | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Edinburg | Texas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Fort Worth | Texas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Grand Rapids | Michigan |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Greenville | South Carolina |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hackensack | New Jersey |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hershey | Pennsylvania |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Iowa City | Iowa |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kansas City | Missouri |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kerrville | Texas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Long Beach | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Melbourne | Florida |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Miami | Florida |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Miami | Florida |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Miami | Florida |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Moreno Valley | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | New Haven | Connecticut |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | New York | New York |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | New York | New York |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | New York | New York |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Norfolk | Virginia |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Palo Alto | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Rapid City | South Dakota |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Saint Paul | Minnesota |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Saint Petersburg | Florida |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | San Diego | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Silver Spring | Maryland |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Sleepy Hollow | New York |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tallahassee | Florida |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Toledo | Ohio |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Topeka | Kansas |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ventura | California |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Washington | District of Columbia |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | West Orange | New Jersey |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Wilmington | Delaware |
United States | Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Worcester | Massachusetts |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Novo Nordisk A/S |
United States, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom,
Tamborlane WV, Barrientos-Pérez M, Fainberg U, Frimer-Larsen H, Hafez M, Hale PM, Jalaludin MY, Kovarenko M, Libman I, Lynch JL, Rao P, Shehadeh N, Turan S, Weghuber D, Barrett T; Ellipse Trial Investigators. Liraglutide in Children and Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):637-646. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903822. Epub 2019 Apr 28. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) | Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the primary analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) | Change in FPG from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% | Percentage of subjects having HbA1c <7.0%. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 26 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) | Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 26. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the world health organisation (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% | Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.0% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5% | Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <=6.5% after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 26 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5% | Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <=6.5% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes | Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.0% without severe or minor hypoglycaemic episodes after 26 weeks.
Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemia was defined as meeting either of the below criteria: an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject him/herself any asymptomatic blood glucose value <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. |
Week 26 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes | Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.0% without severe or minor hypoglycaemic episodes after 52 weeks.
Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemia was defined as meeting either of the below criteria: an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject him/herself any asymptomatic blood glucose value <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. |
Week 52 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5% | Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.5% after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 26 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5% | Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.5% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Change in HbA1c | Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change in FPG | Change in FPG from baseline to week 52. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change in Mean 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose | Change in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose after 26 weeks. Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point SMPG was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by time. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose | Change in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose after 52 weeks. Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point SMPG was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by time. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner) | Change in post-prandial increments (from before meal to 90 min after breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 26 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner) | Change in post-prandial increments (from before meal to 90 min after breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 52 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner) | Change in mean post-prandial increment across all three meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 26 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner) | Change in mean post-prandial increment across all three meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 52 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Body Weight | Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Body Weight | Change from baseline in body weight after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in BMI Standard Deviation Score (SDS) | Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 52. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure) | Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure) | Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Insulin | Ratio to baseline (fasting insulin) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Insulin | Ratio to baseline (fasting insulin) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Pro-insulin | Ratio to baseline (fasting pro-insulin) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Pro-insulin | Ratio to baseline (fasting pro-insulin) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio | Ratio to baseline (Pro-insulin/insulin ratio) after week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio | Ratio to baseline (Pro-insulin/insulin ratio) after week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Glucagon | Ratio to baseline (fasting glucagon) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Glucagon | Ratio to baseline (fasting glucagon) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Fasting C-peptide | Ratio to baseline (fasting C-peptide) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Fasting C-peptide | Ratio to baseline (fasting C-peptide) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) | Ratio to baseline (HOMA-B) after 26 weeks. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: HOMA-B | Ratio to baseline (HOMA-B) after 52 weeks. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Homeostasis Model Assessment as an Index of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) | Ratio to baseline (HOMA-IR) after 26 weeks. HOMA-IR is an index of insulin resistance and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: HOMA-IR | Ratio to baseline (HOMA-IR) after 52 weeks. HOMA-IR is an index of insulin resistance and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Total Cholesterol | Ratio to baseline (total cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Total Cholesterol | Ratio to baseline (total cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol | Ratio to baseline (LDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: LDL Cholesterol | Ratio to baseline (LDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol | Ratio to baseline (VLDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: VLDL Cholesterol | Ratio to baseline (VLDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol | Ratio to baseline (HDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: HDL Cholesterol | Ratio to baseline (HDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Triglycerides | Ratio to baseline (triglycerides) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Triglycerides | Ratio to baseline (triglycerides) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Free Fatty Acids | Ratio to baseline (free fatty acids) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline: Free Fatty Acids | Ratio to baseline (free fatty acids) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Pulse | Change from baseline in pulse 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Pulse | Change from baseline in pulse 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Height SDS | Change in height SDS from baseline to week 26. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Height SDS | Change in height SDS from baseline to week 52. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Change in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist) | Change in bone age from baseline to week 52. If the baseline (week 0) bone age assessment indicated that all epiphyses were fused, then the assessment was not repeated at week 52. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging) | Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V. The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of participants at different Tanner stages at week 0, week 26 and week 52. | Week 0, week 26, week 52 | |
Secondary | Growth (Height Velocity) | Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Growth (Height Velocity) | Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Height Velocity SDS | Height velocity SDS scores at week 26. Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 26 | |
Secondary | Height Velocity SDS | Height velocity SDS scores at week 52. Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. | Week 0, week 52 | |
Secondary | Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes | Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification from baseline (week 0) to week 26. | 0-26 weeks | |
Secondary | Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes | Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification from baseline (week 0) to week 52. | 0-52 weeks | |
Secondary | Number of Adverse Events (Week 0-26) | Total number of adverse events during 26 weeks. | 0-26 weeks | |
Secondary | Number of Adverse Events (Week 0-52) | Total number of adverse events during entire treatment period. | 0-52 weeks | |
Secondary | Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 0-26) | Total number of serious adverse events during 26 weeks. | 0-26 weeks | |
Secondary | Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 0-52) | Total number of serious adverse events during entire treatment period. | 0-52 weeks | |
Secondary | Number of Adverse Events (Week 53-104) | This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of adverse events reported during follow-up 1 (week 53 to 104). | Week 53-104 | |
Secondary | Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 53-104) | This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of serious adverse events reported during follow up 1 (week 53 to 104). | Weeks 53-104 | |
Secondary | Growth (Height Velocity)- Week 104 | Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 0, week 104 | |
Secondary | Height Velocity SDS- Week 104 | The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 0, week 104 | |
Secondary | Change From Week 52 in Height SDS- Week 104 | Change in height SDS from week 52 to week 104. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 52, week 104 | |
Secondary | Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104 | Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V, where stage I represents "pre-adoloscent development" and stage V represents "pubertal development equivalent to that of an adult". The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of subjects at different Tanner stages at week 52 and week 104. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 52, week 104 | |
Secondary | Change From Week 52 in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist)- Week 104 | Change in bone age from week 52 to week 104. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 52, week 104 | |
Secondary | Number of Adverse Events (Week 53-156) | This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of adverse events reported during the follow-up period (weeks 53 to 156). | Week 53-156 | |
Secondary | Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 53-156) | This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of serious adverse events reported during the follow up period (week 53 to 156). | Weeks 53-156 | |
Secondary | Growth (Height Velocity)- Week 156 | Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 0, week 156 | |
Secondary | Height Velocity SDS- Week 156 | The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 0, week 156 | |
Secondary | Change From Week 52 in Height SDS- Week 156 | Change in height SDS from week 52 to week 156. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 52, week 156 | |
Secondary | Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156 | Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V, where stage I represents "pre-adoloscent development" and stage V represents "pubertal development equivalent to that of an adult". The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of subjects at different Tanner stages at week 52 and week 156. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 52, week 156 | |
Secondary | Change From Week 52 in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist)- Week 156 | Change in bone age from week 52 to week 156. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. | Week 52, week 156 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05666479 -
CGM Monitoring in T2DM Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Replacement Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT05647083 -
The Effect of Massage on Diabetic Parameters
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05661799 -
Persistence of Physical Activity in People With Type 2 Diabetes Over Time.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03686722 -
Effect of Co-administration of Metformin and Daclatasvir on the Pharmacokinetis and Pharmacodynamics of Metformin
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02836704 -
Comparison of Standard vs Higher Starting Dose of Insulin Glargine in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (Glargine Starting Dose)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01819129 -
Efficacy and Safety of FIAsp Compared to Insulin Aspart in Combination With Insulin Glargine and Metformin in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04562714 -
Impact of Flash Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 2 Diabetes Using Non-Insulin Antihyperglycemic Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02009488 -
Treatment Differences Between Canagliflozin and Placebo in Insulin Secretion in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05896319 -
Hyaluronic Acid Treatment of the Post-extraction Tooth Socket Healing in Subjects With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05598203 -
Effect of Nutrition Education Groups in the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05046873 -
A Research Study Looking Into Blood Levels of Semaglutide and NNC0480-0389 When Given in the Same Injection or in Two Separate Injections in Healthy People
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04030091 -
Pulsatile Insulin Infusion Therapy in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT04090242 -
Impact of App Based Diabetes Training Program in Conjunction With the BD Nano Pen Needle in People With T2 Diabetes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03604224 -
A Study to Observe Clinical Effectiveness of Canagliflozin 300 mg Containing Treatment Regimens in Indian Type 2 Diabetes Participants With BMI>25 kg/m^2, in Real World Clinical Setting
|
||
Completed |
NCT03620357 -
Continuous Glucose Monitoring & Management In Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01696266 -
An International Survey on Hypoglycaemia Among Insulin-treated Patients With Diabetes
|
||
Completed |
NCT03620890 -
Detemir Versus NPH for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05473286 -
A Research Study Looking at How Oral Semaglutide Works in People With Type 2 Diabetes in Germany, as Part of Local Clinical Practice
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05029804 -
Effect of Walking Exercise Training on Adherence to Disease Management and Metabolic Control in Diabetes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04531631 -
Effects of Dorzagliatin on 1st Phase Insulin and Beta-cell Glucose Sensitivity in T2D and Monogenic Diabetes
|
Phase 2 |