Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00432276
Other study ID # 01-06-TL-322OPI-004
Secondary ID 2006-006025-73U1
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received February 5, 2007
Last updated April 1, 2013
Start date January 2007
Est. completion date June 2009

Study information

Verified date April 2013
Source Takeda
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug AdministrationAustralia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods AdministrationAustralia: Human Research Ethics CommitteeAustralia: National Health and Medical Research CouncilAustria: Agency for Health and Food SafetyAustria: EthikkommissionAustria: Federal Ministry for Health and WomenAustria: Federal Office for Safety in Health CareBelgium: Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, FAMHPBelgium: Federal Agency for Medicinal Products and Health ProductsBelgium: Institutional Review BoardBelgium: Ministry of Social Affairs, Public Health and the EnvironmentBelgium: The Federal Public Service (FPS) Health, Food Chain Safety and EnvironmentDenmark: Danish Dataprotection AgencyDenmark: Danish Medicines AgencyDenmark: Ethics CommitteeDenmark: National Board of HealthDenmark: The Danish National Committee on Biomedical Research EthicsDenmark: Ministry of HealthDenmark: The Regional Committee on Biomedical Research EthicsFinland: Ethics CommitteeFinland: Ministry of Social Affairs and HealthFinland: Finnish Medicines AgencyFrance: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis)France: Direction Générale de la SantéFrance: French Data Protection AuthorityFrance: Institutional Ethical CommitteeFrance: Ministry of HealthFrance: National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life SciencesGermany: Ethics CommissionGermany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical DevicesGermany: Federal Ministry of Education and ResearchGermany: Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer ProtectionGermany: German Institute of Medical Documentation and InformationGermany: Ministry of HealthGermany: Paul-Ehrlich-InstitutGreece: Ethics CommitteeGreece: Ministry of Health and WelfareGreece: National Organization of MedicinesIndia: Central Drugs Standard Control OrganizationIndia: Department of Atomic EnergyIndia: Drugs Controller General of IndiaIndia: Indian Council of Medical ResearchIndia: Institutional Review BoardIndia: Ministry of HealthIndia: Ministry of Science and TechnologyIndia: Science and Engineering Research CouncilItaly: Ethics CommitteeItaly: Ministry of HealthItaly: National Bioethics CommitteeItaly: National Institute of HealthItaly: National Monitoring Centre for Clinical Trials - Ministry of HealthItaly: The Italian Medicines AgencyNetherlands: Independent Ethics CommitteeNetherlands: Dutch Health Care InspectorateNetherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC)Netherlands: Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB)Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO)New Zealand: Food Safety AuthorityNew Zealand: Health Research CouncilNew Zealand: Health and Disability Ethics CommitteesNew Zealand: Institutional Review BoardNew Zealand: MedsafeNorway: Data Protection AuthorityNorway: Directorate of HealthNorway: Norwegian Institute of Public HealthNorway: Norwegian Medicines AgencyNorway: Norwegian Social Science Data ServicesNorway:National Committee for Medical and Health Research EthicsRomania: Ministry of Public HealthRomania: National Medicines AgencyRomania: State Institute for Drug ControlRussia: Ethics CommitteeRussia: Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationRussia: Pharmacological Committee, Ministry of HealthSouth Africa: Department of HealthSouth Africa: Medicines Control CouncilSouth Africa: National Health Research Ethics CouncilSouth Korea: Institutional Review BoardSouth Korea: Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA)Spain: Comité Ético de Investigación ClínicaSpain: Ethics CommitteeSpain: Ministry of HealthSpain: Ministry of Health and ConsumptionSpain: Spanish Agency of MedicinesSwitzerland: EthikkommissionSwitzerland: Federal Office of Public HealthSwitzerland: Laws and standardsSwitzerland: SwissmedicUnited Kingdom: Department of HealthUnited Kingdom: Food Standards AgencyUnited Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory AgencyUnited Kingdom: National Health ServiceUnited Kingdom: Research Ethics CommitteeUnited Nations: International Atomic Energy AgencyUnited States: Federal GovernmentUnited States: Institutional Review BoardLatvia: State Agency of MedicinesSweden: Institutional Review BoardSweden: Medical Products AgencySweden: Regional Ethical Review BoardSweden: Swedish National Council on Medical EthicsSweden: Swedish Research CouncilSweden: The National Board of Health and Welfare
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effect of adding alogliptin, once daily (QD), to the ongoing treatment regimen of pioglitazone HCl and metformin in patients with inadequate glycemic control.


Description:

Despite the introduction of new classes of medications for glycemic control, just over half of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) achieve a glycosylated hemoglobin level less than 7.0%, the American Diabetes Association recommended glycosylated hemoglobin goal. The rising incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus along with limitations of the currently available treatments suggest the need for new therapies for glycemic control along with the increased requirement for combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Thiazolidinediones increase glucose utilization, decrease gluconeogenesis, and increase glucose disposal through an incompletely understood mechanism but one associated with binding of the drug to nuclear receptors known as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma are found in tissues important for insulin action, such as adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and the liver. The greatest concentration of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma receptors is in adipose tissue. Thiazolidinediones reduce insulin resistance by enhancing insulin sensitivity in muscle cells, adipose tissue, and hepatic cells (inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis) with no direct impact on insulin secretion. Thus, thiazolidinediones improve glycemic control and result in reduced levels of circulating insulin. Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS®) is a thiazolidinedione developed by Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Pioglitazone depends on the presence of insulin for its mechanism of action. Worldwide clinical investigation has shown that, as an adjunct to diet and exercise, pioglitazone improves glycemic control when used as monotherapy, and in combination with commonly used antidiabetic medications (ie, sulfonylureas, metformin, or insulin).

SYR-322 (alogliptin) is a selective, orally available inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV currently in development by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. as a treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV is the primary enzyme involved in the in vivo degradation of at least 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. Both peptides exert important effects on islet β-cells to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion and regulate β-cell proliferation and cytoprotection. Glucagon-like peptide-1 also inhibits gastric emptying, glucagon secretion, and food intake. The glucose-lowering actions of glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, are preserved in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Given the complementary mechanisms of action of alogliptin (stimulation of insulin secretion) and pioglitazone (enhancement of insulin sensitivity) and the absence of overlapping safety risks, the introduction of this combination therapy in patients with T2DM could potentially show enhanced glycemic control and allow patients to reach and maintain their HbA1c goal more effectively.

This study is designed to determine if the addition of alogliptin to a combination of pioglitazone with metformin can be effective at achieving glycemic control without increasing safety risks versus the titration of pioglitazone to 45 mg with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are experiencing inadequate glycemic control on a current regimen of metformin.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 803
Est. completion date June 2009
Est. primary completion date May 2009
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Has a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

- Meets one of the following:

- Has been inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 10%, inclusive) on a stable dose of greater than or equal to 1500 mg (or maximum tolerated dose) of metformin and 30 mg of pioglitazone

- Has been inadequately controlled (as defined by an HbA1c =7.5%) on a combination therapy including metformin and another oral antidiabetic agent (ie, sulfonylureas, rosiglitazone maleate, or pioglitazone 15 mg, etc). Subjects on a combination therapy that included a DPP-4 inhibitor were excluded.

- No treatment with antidiabetic agents other than metformin and pioglitazone.

- Body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m^2 and less than or equal to 45 kg/m^2.

- Fasting plasma C-peptide concentration greater than or equal to 0.8 ng/mL.

- Systolic blood pressure less than 160 mmHg and diastolic pressure less than 100 mmHg.

- Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 12 g/dL for males and greater than or equal to 10 g/dL for females.

- Alanine aminotransferase less than or equal to 2.5 x upper limit of normal.

- Serum creatinine less than 1.5 mg/dL for males and less than 1.4 mg/dL for females.

- Thyroid-stimulating hormone level less than or equal to the upper limit of normal range and the patient is clinically euthyroid.

- Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.

- Able and willing to monitor their own blood glucose concentrations with a home glucose monitor.

- No major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the patient from completing the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Urine albumin/creatinine ratio of greater than 1000 µg/mg.

- History of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening.

- History of bladder cancer.

- History of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within the 6 months prior to Screening.

- Patients with unexplained microscopic hematuria of greater than +1, confirmed by repeat testing.

- History of treated diabetic gastroparesis.

- History of gastric bypass surgery.

- New York Heart Association Class I-IV heart failure regardless of therapy.

- History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within the 6 months prior to Screening.

- History of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of glycosylated hemoglobin.

- History of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus.

- History of a psychiatric disorder that will affect the patient's ability to participate in the study.

- History of angioedema in association with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors.

- History of alcohol abuse or substance abuse within the 2 years prior to Screening.

- Receipt of any investigational drug within the 30 days prior to Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months prior to Screening.

- Prior treatment in an investigational study of alogliptin.

- Hypersensitive to pioglitazone HCl, metformin, alogliptin or other excipients.

- The patient has donated more than 400 mL of blood within the 90 days prior to Screening and Pre-Screening, if applicable.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Alogliptin
Alogliptin tablets.
Pioglitazone
Pioglitazone tablets.
Metformin
Metformin HCl tablets (immediate-release, commercially available formulation) =1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose.
Placebo
Matching placebo tablets.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Takeda

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Bosi E, Ellis GC, Wilson CA, Fleck PR. Alogliptin as a third oral antidiabetic drug in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin and pioglitazone: a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group stu — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) The change from Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound). Baseline and Weeks 26 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) during the study. Least Squares Means were from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, study schedule, and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HbA1c as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 34 and 42. No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin = 6.5% Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5%. Weeks 26 and 52. No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin = 7.0% Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7%. Weeks 26 and 52. No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin = 7.5% Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7.5%. Weeks 26 and 52. No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin = 0.5% Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 0.5%. Weeks 26 and 52. No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin = 1.0% Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.0%. Weeks 26 and 52. No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin = 1.5% Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.5%. Weeks 26 and 52. No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin = 2.0% Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 2.0%. Weeks 26 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was assessed at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline FPG as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia Marked Hyperglycemia is defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.10 mmol/L). Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percentage of Participants Meeting Hyperglycemic Rescue Criteria Rescue was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria, confirmed by a 2nd sample drawn within 7 days after the first sample and analyzed by the central laboratory:
After more than 2 weeks of treatment but prior to the Week 4 Visit: A single fasting plasma glucose (FPG) =275 mg/dL;
From the Week 4 Visit but prior to the Week 8 Visit: A single FPG =250 mg/dL;
From the Week 8 Visit but prior to the Week 12 Visit: A single FPG =225 mg/dL;
From the Week 12 Visit through the End-of-Treatment Visit: HbA1c =8.5% AND =0.5% reduction in HbA1c as compared with the baseline HbA1c.
Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin Proinsulin is a precursor to insulin, and was measured as an indicator of pancreatic function. The change from Baseline in fasting proinsulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting proinsulin as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin The change from Baseline in fasting insulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting insulin as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (µIU/mL) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52 relative to the Baseline value. Least squares means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting proinsulin/insulin ratio as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in C-peptide C-peptide is a byproduct created when the hormone insulin is produced and is measured by a blood test. Change from Baseline was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting C-peptide as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Calculated HOMA Insulin Resistance The Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:
HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5
A higher number indicates a greater degree of insulin resistance. The change from Baseline in HOMA IR was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA insulin resistance as covariates.
Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Calculated HOMA Beta-cell Function The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.
HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5
The change from Baseline in the homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA beta cell function as covariates.
Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Body Weight Change from Baseline in body weight was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline body weight as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Change from Baseline in total cholesterol was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Change from Baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Change from Baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Change from Baseline in triglycerides was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids Change from Baseline in free fatty acids was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline free fatty acids as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42, and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A1 as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2 Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2 was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein B was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein B as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Change from Baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline PAI-1 as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Change from Baseline in high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline hsCRP as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Adiponectin Change from Baseline in adiponectin was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline adiponectin as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR triglycerides as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.
Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL/chylomicron particles as covariates.
Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides The change from Baseline in levels of VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.
Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as covariates.
Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL particles as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size Change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean VLDL particle size as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline IDL particles as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL particles as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size Change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean LDL particle size as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL particles as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size Change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean HDL particle size as covariates. Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03743779 - Mastering Diabetes Pilot Study
Completed NCT03786978 - Pharmaceutical Care in the Reduction of Readmission Rates in Diabetes Melitus N/A
Completed NCT01804803 - DIgital Assisted MONitoring for DiabeteS - I N/A
Completed NCT05039970 - A Real-World Study of a Mobile Device-based Serious Health Game on Session Attendance in the National Diabetes Prevention Program N/A
Completed NCT04507867 - Effect of a NSS to Reduce Complications in Patients With Covid-19 and Comorbidities in Stage III N/A
Completed NCT04068272 - Safety of Bosentan in Type II Diabetic Patients Phase 1
Completed NCT03243383 - Readmission Prevention Pilot Trial in Diabetes Patients N/A
Completed NCT03730480 - User Performance of the CONTOUR NEXT and CONTOUR TV3 Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS) N/A
Recruiting NCT02690467 - Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of the New Pen Needle 34gx3,5mm. N/A
Completed NCT02229383 - Phase III Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Added Exenatide Versus Placebo to Titrated Basal Insulin Glargine in Inadequately Controlled Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus Phase 3
Completed NCT06181721 - Evaluating Glucose Control Using a Next Generation Automated Insulin Delivery Algorithm in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes N/A
Completed NCT05799976 - Text Message-Based Nudges Prior to Primary Care Visits to Increase Care Gap Closure N/A
Recruiting NCT04489043 - Exercise, Prediabetes and Diabetes After Renal Transplantation. N/A
Withdrawn NCT03319784 - Analysis for NSAID VS Corticosteroid Shoulder Injection in Diabetic Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT03542084 - Endocrinology Auto-Triggered e-Consults N/A
Completed NCT02229396 - Phase 3 28-Week Study With 24-Week and 52-week Extension Phases to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide Once Weekly and Dapagliflozin Versus Exenatide and Dapagliflozin Matching Placebo Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05544266 - Rare and Atypical Diabetes Network
Completed NCT01892319 - An International Non-interventional Cohort Study to Evaluate the Safety of Treatment With Insulin Detemir in Pregnant Women With Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Pregnancy Registry
Completed NCT05031000 - Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: Discounter Versus Brand N/A
Recruiting NCT04039763 - RT-CGM in Young Adults at Risk of DKA N/A