View clinical trials related to Dental Implant.
Filter by:This study aims to characterise the stability of crestal bone levels one year after loading, the associated aesthetic outcomes, immunological response, prosthodontic outcomes as well as overall patient reported outcome measures for modSLA (SLActive, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) and NGA (TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland) dental implants.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the response of different bone densities to treatment with Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) in patients who need treatment with dental implant. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To investigate if bone reaction to PRF differ with different bone densities. - To study the effect of PRF on dental implant healing and to assess its effectiveness in accelerating osseointegration. Participants who need treatment with dental implant will be planned to include in this study and will be asked if they are willing to participate in this study voluntarily. All the participants will be given an information sheet and a consent form which provides simple description about the present study and its importance to insure voluntary participation. The patients will be aware that they are completely free to withdraw from the research any time during the research time. Platelet Rich Fibrin will be injected inside the hole that prepared to place dental implant in. Bone density will be evaluated, degree of osseointegration will be monitored.
The study aims to compare clinical, radiographic, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and cost analysis outcomes in type I, II and socket preserved sites (III/IV) implant placement at 1-year post-loading in all groups.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate whether is better to place KS Osstem Implants with BA or SA surface placed in patients with type 2 diabetes, and to compare clinical and radiographic data.
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two different implant systems with different implant-abutment connection: Osstem TS III (control group) versus Osstem KS (study group).
Rationale: Early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using either a collagen matrix or a palatal graft rendered similar esthetic, clinical and PROMs to early implant placement without ARP, up to 1 year after functional loading. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate esthetic and clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla in patients treated with a xenograft and a collagen matrix or a free connective tissue graft versus spontaneous healing 5 years after loading Study design: prospective observational study with 5-year follow-up Intervention (if applicable): not applicable Main study parameters/endpoints: Comparison of the level of the buccal marginal gingiva (midfacial mucosa level) between ARP versus spontaneous healing Secondary parameters/endpoint: Peri-implant esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES), complications, implant survival; and success, Plaque Index, Modified bleeding index, Gingival Index, Probing Depth, PROMs, bone and soft tissue volumetric dimensional changes.
Immediate tooth replacement with immediate implants into fresh extraction sockets has become a common and promising clinical procedure in daily practice in regard of implant survival, osseointegration and esthetic outcomes . However, there are some challenges encountered in the treatment of patients with labial bone plate dehiscence. Deficiency of facial bone anatomy has a negative impact on esthetics and is a critical causative factor for esthetic implant complications and failures .. Few studies investigated the reconstitution of labial bone plate dehiscence using ice cream cone technique and their results showed adequate bone regeneration 4 to 6 months where no labial plate was present prior to grafting technique. Ice cream cone technique as a flapless grafting technique in conjunction with immediate implant placement in patients with labial bone plate dehiscence requires further studies for its clinical relevance and approval.
The study will compare between osteotome technique and New Reverse Drilling Technique in the placement of dental implant in posterior maxilla , primary outcome will be Implant stability that will be measured by Periotest device . follow up for 6 month. secondary outcomes will be crestal bone loss , pain and swelling.
Implants placed immediately after tooth extraction usually present challenges in obtaining soft tissue coverage with high risk of bacterial invasion, wound dehiscence and subsequently adverse effect on the success rate of the implant due to lack of primary soft tissue closure over the implant. Different surgical methods have been described to achieve primary soft tissue closure in maxillary fresh socket, each having its advantages and disadvantages, based on that, buccal pad of fat can solve this soft tissue coverage problem with minimal complications and high success rate of the placed implants.The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of buccal pad of fat tissue with immediate implant placement in the posterior maxillary area.
The study aims to investigate and compare the reduction in (1) soft tissue inflammation and (2) amount of plaque accumulation at implant sites with (test) or without (control) patient administered use of single tufted brush. Stratified randomized single blinded clinical controlled trial with 2 parallel arms is designed to achieve the aims of this research project. Study participants will be enrolled from NUH University Dental Cluster. They will be randomly assigned into the test (toothbrush, interdental brush, and single tufted brush) and control (toothbrush and interdental brush) groups and reviewed at 2 weeks (± 3 days), 4 weeks (± 3 days), 3 months (± 7 days), and 6 months (± 7 days).