Cytomegalovirus Infection Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Blinded Investigation of Six Weeks vs. Six Months of Oral Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants With Symptomatic Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection (CASG 112)
Verified date | July 2015 |
Source | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is known to cause hearing loss and mental retardation. The purpose of this study is to compare a 6-week course to a 6-month course of the drug valganciclovir in babies born with CMV to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment. Participants will include 104 infants (30 days old or younger) born with CMV disease. All infants will take valganciclovir by mouth for 6 weeks. At the end of the 6 week period, subjects will be assigned by chance to receive either valganciclovir or placebo (inactive substance) to complete the 6 months of antiviral treatment. Patients will be followed for the study related evaluations of safety, changes to hearing, and developmental milestones for up to 2 years. Patients will be followed by telephone contact for an additional 3 years. Thus, participants may be involved in study related procedures for approximately 5 years.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 109 |
Est. completion date | June 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2011 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A to 30 Days |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Signed informed consent from parent(s) or legal guardian(s) - Confirmation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) from urine or throat swab specimens by culture, shell vial, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests - Symptomatic congenital CMV disease, as manifest by one or more of the following: 1. Thrombocytopenia 2. Petechiae 3. Hepatomegaly 4. Splenomegaly 5. Intrauterine growth restriction 6. Hepatitis (elevated transaminases and/or bilirubin) 7. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement of the CMV disease [such as microcephaly, radiographic abnormalities indicative of CMV CNS disease, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indices for age, chorioretinitis, hearing deficits as detected by formal brainstem evoked response (not a screening auditory brainstem response {ABR}), and/or positive CMV PCR from CSF] - Less than or equal to 30 days of age at study enrollment - Weight at study enrollment greater than or equal to 1800 grams - Gestational age greater than or equal to 32 weeks at birth Exclusion Criteria: - Imminent demise - Patients receiving other antiviral agents or immune globulin - Gastrointestinal abnormality which might preclude absorption of an oral medication (e.g., a history of necrotizing enterocolitis) - Documented renal insufficiency, as noted by a creatinine clearance less than 10 mL/min/1.73m^2 at time of study enrollment - Breastfeeding from mother who is receiving ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir, or maribivir - Infants known to be born to women who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive (but HIV testing is not required for study entry) - Current receipt of other investigational drugs |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | Birmingham Heartlands Hospital | Birmingham | |
United Kingdom | Bristol Royal Hospital for Children - UBHT Education Centre | Bristol | Bristol, City of |
United Kingdom | Alder Hey Childrens Hospital | Liverpool | |
United Kingdom | Saint George's Hospital - Pediatric Infectious Diseases | London | London, City of |
United Kingdom | University College London - Royal Free Campus - Virology | London | London, City of |
United Kingdom | Newcastle General Hospital | Newcastle Upon Tyne | |
United Kingdom | John Radcliffe Hospital | Oxford | Oxfordshire |
United States | Emory Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Children's Hospital Colorado - Infectious Disease | Aurora | Colorado |
United States | Johns Hopkins Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | University of Alabama - Children's of Alabama - Clinical Virology | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Children's Hospital Boston - Infectious Diseases | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo - Infectious Diseases | Buffalo | New York |
United States | Medical University of South Carolina - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Carolinas Medical Center - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | Cleveland Clinic Main Campus - Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | MetroHealth Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Disease | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Nationwide Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Children's Medical Center Dallas - Neonatal ICU | Dallas | Texas |
United States | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Pediatrics | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Cook Children's Infectious Disease Services | Fort Worth | Texas |
United States | University of Mississippi - Children's Infectious Diseases | Jackson | Mississippi |
United States | University of Florida - College of Medicine - Jacksonville | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics - Infectious Diseases | Kansas City | Missouri |
United States | Arkansas Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases | Little Rock | Arkansas |
United States | Los Angeles County - University of Southern California - Medical Center - Pediatrics | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Plaza Towers Obstetrics and Gynecology | Los Angeles | California |
United States | University of Louisville School of Medicine - Kosair Childrens Hospital - Infectious Diseases | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Cohen Children's Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases | Manhasset | New York |
United States | University of Minnesota - Pediatric Infectious Disease | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | University of South Alabama - Children's Specialty Clinic | Mobile | Alabama |
United States | Vanderbilt University - Pediatric - Infectious Diseases | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Childrens Hospital at Saint Peters University Hospital - Allergy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases | New Brunswick | New Jersey |
United States | Robert Wood Johnson Medical School - Pediatrics | New Brunswick | New Jersey |
United States | Tulane University - Tulane Medical Center - Pediatrics | New Orleans | Louisiana |
United States | Creighton University Medical Center - Medicine - Infectious Diseases | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | Children's Hospital of Orange County - Infectious Diseases | Orange | California |
United States | Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC - Pediatric Infectious Diseases | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Rhode Island Hospital - Pediatrics | Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | University of Rochester Medical Center - Golisano Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases | Rochester | New York |
United States | Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Center for Clinical Studies | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | University of Utah - Pediatric Pharmacology Program | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Seattle Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Louisiana State University Health Shreveport - Pediatrics | Shreveport | Louisiana |
United States | Stanford University School of Medicine | Stanford | California |
United States | SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital - Pediatrics | Syracuse | New York |
United States | University of South Florida - Tampa General Hospital - Pediatrics | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Children's National Medical Center - Sheikh Zayed Campus - Infectious Disease | Washington | District of Columbia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
United States, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 6 Months. | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 6 months | |
Secondary | Adverse Events Which Lead to Permanent Discontinuation of Valganciclovir Therapy or Lead to Irreversible Outcome of the Adverse Event. | Adverse events were assessed at each visit through month 7 of the study. No subject discontinued valganciclovir therapy due to permanent discontinuation of valganciclovir therapy or lead to irreversible outcome of any adverse event. | baseline through 7 months | |
Secondary | Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 12 Months. | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 12 months | |
Secondary | Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 24 Months. | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 24 months | |
Secondary | Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects) | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 6 months | |
Secondary | Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects) | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 12 months | |
Secondary | Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects) | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 24 months | |
Secondary | Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects) | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 6 months | |
Secondary | Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects) | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 12 months | |
Secondary | Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects) | Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. | Between baseline and 24 months | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score). | Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cogonitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. | 12 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score). | Receptive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. | 12 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score). | Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. | 12 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score). | Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. | 12 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score). | Fine Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. | 12 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score). | Gross Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. | 12 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score). | Motor Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. | 12 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 24 Months Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score). | Receptive Communication Scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. | 24 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score). | Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores are between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cognitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. | 24 months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score). | Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. | 24 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurologic Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score). | Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. | 24 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 24 Months, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score). | Fine motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. | 24 Months after enrollment | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score). | Gross motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. | 24 Months after enrollment. | |
Secondary | Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score). | Motor composite score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. | 24 Months after enrollment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00023036 -
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Enlarged Vestibular Aqueducts
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01037712 -
In UTERO Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Congenital Infection With Valacyclovir
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00370006 -
Phase 1 Trial of CMV Towne Vaccine in Subjects Previously Received VCL CT02 Vaccine ID or IM
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01552369 -
CMV Antiviral Prevention Strategies in D+R-Liver Transplants ("CAPSIL")
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01588015 -
Vaccine Therapy in Preventing Cytomegalovirus Infection in Patients With Hematological Malignancies Undergoing Donor Stem Cell Transplant
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00223925 -
Maribavir for Prevention of CMV After Stem Cell Transplants
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05085366 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1647 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Vaccine in Healthy Participants 16 to 40 Years of Age
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01220895 -
Alternate Donor Study of Pre-Emptive Cellular Therapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00942305 -
Study of CMX001 to Prevent/Control Cytomegalovirus Infection in R+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00373412 -
Trial of pDNA CMV Vaccine (VCL-CT02) Followed by Towne CMV Vaccine (Towne) Challenge
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05105048 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Vaccine mRNA-1647
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00386412 -
TAMOVALCIR in Allogenic Hematopoietic Progenitors Transplant
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03382405 -
Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of Cytomegalovirus Vaccines mRNA-1647 and mRNA-1443 in Healthy Adults
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02454699 -
Safety and PK of MBX-400 (Cyclopropavir) in Normal Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03910478 -
Dried Blood Spot Testing of CMV Detection in HCT Recipients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01354301 -
Efficacy and Safety of Induction Strategies Combined With Low Tacrolimus Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus or Sodium Mycophenolate
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01473849 -
Impact of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Replication Over Hepatitis C Recurrence in Liver Transplant Recipients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00880789 -
Safety, Toxicity and MTD of One Intravenous IV Injection of Donor CTLs Specific for CMV and Adenovirus
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00817908 -
Quantiferon - Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and the Prediction of CMV Infection In High Risk Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00273143 -
A Trial to Study How the Body Fights Off Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Hematopoietic Transplant Recipients.
|
Phase 1 |