View clinical trials related to Crush Injuries.
Filter by:Pressure injuries are a serious health care problem and affect millions of people. Most pressure injuries are avoidable with the application of best practices and with the use of appropriate technology. Support surfaces are a crucial component of any comprehensive prevention strategy. Decades of research have produced moderate and low levels of evidence upon which to base clinical decisions concerning how and when to apply support surfaces for prevention. This knowledge has been periodically assessed and assembled into clinical practice guidelines. There is good evidence that the combined group of active and reactive support surfaces is effective in preventing pressure injuries and that high-specification reactive foam surfaces are effective in preventing pressure injuries. But there is insufficient evidence that low air loss surfaces are more or less effective than other types of surfaces. Yet, low air loss surfaces are used for more than 17% of patients in acute care at high risk of developing pressure injuries. The study is designed to determine if and when low air loss is effective in preventing pressure injuries, and what level of heat and moisture control performance is necessary for prevention effectiveness. The primary aim of the project is to compare the effectiveness of reactive support surfaces with low air loss to reactive support surfaces without low air loss in preventing pressure injuries for people with moisture risk factors in acute care. Support surfaces are currently marketed and identified by practitioners based on device features (e.g., low air loss, air fluidization, alternating pressure), categories (powered, non-powered, reactive, and active) and components (e.g., foam, gel, fluid). The critical performance characteristics of low air loss systems are moisture, humidity and temperature management. Preliminary work has revealed that these characteristics vary widely among different low air loss products. A secondary aim of the proposed study is to explore associations between support surface performance characteristics and pressure injury outcomes to identify which low air loss performance characteristics and what level of those performance characteristics are necessary for the technology to be effective. Successful completion of this project will fill a critical gap in evidence regarding the effectiveness of support surfaces with low air loss, and could influence a shift in the way support surfaces are characterized away from the current feature-based paradigm toward a more clinically relevant and generalizable performance-based paradigm.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate incidence of complete epithelialization in stage 3 & 4 pressure ulcers using ACell products.
The objective of this study is to provide an up-to-date, global picture of the extent and patterns of pressure injuries in ICUs. Point prevalence studies are only of value when performed on a vast scale. To sample a representative cohort, it is the intention to recruit about 1200 ICUs with all continents covered and as many countries as possible within each continent.
When the retractor blades oped and is positioned to provide the surgical access in the anterior cervical spine surgery, it cause the trachea to deviate laterally and pose pressure on the tissue between the retractor and the trachea. This is convincible as revealed by the increase of cuff pressure of endotracheal tube. The study aims to investigate differences in the increase of cuff pressure after retractor is positioned between nasotracheal and orotracheal intubation.
This study describes a procedure to collect a subject's position, movement, physiological data and usability information using Masimo's investigational device.
A Multi-Centre, Open, Non-controlled, Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the User Friendliness and Wear Time of Multi-layer Foam Dressings With Safetac® for Pressure Injury Prevention in the Intensive Care Unit
The presence of pressure injuries has been considered a quality indicator of health care services and efforts has been made to develop guidelines to prevent this issue. Intensive care unit admissions (ICU) are recognized as risk factors to develop pressure injuries due to reduced mobility of critically ill patients and large number of devices and hard technologies that jeopardize preventive measures, such as, decubitus changes. There are not current definitive evidence about the superiority of any support surface to treat or prevent pressure injuries. The objective of the present study is to analyze if the use of viscoelastic support surface in vulnerable critically ill patients decreases the incidence of pressure injury compared with pyramidal foam support surface. Randomized clinical trial performed in an intensive care unit for adult patients in a philanthropic hospital. Inclusion criteria are patients admitted to ICU with Braden scale ≤ 14. Exclusion criteria are age under 18 years, less than 24 hours of ICU length of stay, contraindication of performing complete institutional preventive measures for support injuries, presence of support injuries at ICU admission or absence of informed consent. Randomization will be made by computerized generated numbers and patients will be allocated in two groups in a ratio of 1:1. All study patients will be cared for according to standard institutional preventive measures. The interventional group will be placed in an ICU bed with viscoelastic support surface and the control group in an ICU bed with pyramidal foam support surface. The main outcome evaluated will be the occurrence of type II pressure injury. Secondary outcomes are the time to the occurrence of pressure injury, length of ICU and hospital stay and 28 days mortality rate. Significance level will be 5%.
The goal of the project is to study whether multidisciplinary follow- up performed via telemedicine to the patient in his or her own home, will improve the healthcare services offered to a particular group of patients. The hypotheses are that this could increase the treatment options, increase knowledge translation, give significant socioeconomic benefits, and allow greater accessibility to specialized healthcare services, as well as increase the involvement of patients and those working in primary healthcare.
Dolutegravir is an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor which is marketed as a single tablet (Tivicay®) and in a fixed dose combination tablet with abacavir and lamivudine (Triumeq®, referred to as TRI). For patients with swallowing difficulties, administration of whole tablets can be problematic and tablets are cut or crushed to ease administration. Currently there is no information about crushing TRI tablets. Therefore this study will be conducted to investigate whether crushed and suspended TRI and crushed and suspended TRI with drip feed are bioequivalent to taking TRI as a whole.
The purpose of the Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Registry (HBOTR) is to provide real world patient outcome and side effect information from electronic health records submitted to a specialty specific hyperbaric registry as part of "Stage 2 of Meaningful Use," including data provided to meet PQRS requirements via the registry's QCDR mission. Goals include understanding the value of HBOT among patients treated for a variety of conditions in relation to the frequency and severity of HBOT side effects. While randomized, controlled trials can establish the efficacy of treatments like HBOT, because they routinely exclude patients with co-morbid conditions common to those patients seen in usual clinical practice, the results of RCTs are usually non-generalizable. Real world data can be used to better understand the effectiveness of HBOT among typical patients, as well as the risks associated with treatment.