Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05416242
Other study ID # UDDS-Ortho-11-2022
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 14, 2019
Est. completion date August 22, 2021

Study information

Verified date June 2022
Source Damascus University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The different types of brackets (e.g., self-ligating and conventional brackets), and the various acceleration methods (e.g., corticotomy) cause varying degrees of pain and discomfort. This study will assess pain, discomfort, and other patient-centered outcomes in adults with severe crowding on the upper jaw requiring two first premolars extraction. There are three groups: The first group (control group): the patients in this group will be treated using conventional brackets alone. The second group (Experimental group): the patients in this group will be treated using self-ligating brackets alone. The third group (Experimental group): the patients in this group will be treated using self-ligating brackets associated with flapless corticotomy.


Description:

Pain associated with orthodontic treatment is one of the undesirable complications, which negatively affects the patient's cooperation. Pain may occur due to the pressure on the periodontal ligaments induced by orthodontic forces. The perception of pain is affected by many factors related to the patient, such as age, gender and any previous treatment experiences, which are negatively or positively reflected on the patient's cooperation. As for the factors related to the type of orthodontic treatment provided, the pain and discomfort are proportional to the brackets system used and the forces applied, especially in the leveling and alignment stage. The amount of tooth movement is directly affected by the friction between the brackets and the wires used. The physical properties of the wire and brackets used and the dimensions of the applied wires, in addition to the type of ligation play a significant role in the amount of friction generated.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 63
Est. completion date August 22, 2021
Est. primary completion date October 7, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 28 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. The patient's age is between 18 and 25 years 2. Severe crowding on the upper jaw (more than 6 mm) requires upper first premolars extraction 3. Little's Index of Irregularity is greater than 7 mm 4. Overbite ranging between 0-4 mm 5. Normal inclination of the upper incisors 6. No missing teeth (except for third molars) 7. Class I or class II (ANB = 5) or class III (ANB = 0) Exclusion Criteria: 1. The presence of any systemic disease affecting orthodontic movement 2. The presence of congenital syndromes or cleft lip and palate 3. Poor oral health with a plaque index greater than (1) 4. Skeletal maxillary constriction

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Traditional braces
MBT 0.022 perception traditional braces will be used without any acceleration method.
Self-ligating braces
MBT 0.022 perception Self-ligating braces will be used without any acceleration method.
Procedure:
Self-ligating braces + piezocision
Flapless corticotomy will be applied for the upper anterior teeth.

Locations

Country Name City State
Syrian Arab Republic University of Damascus Damascus

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Damascus University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Syrian Arab Republic, 

References & Publications (5)

Fleming PS, Dibiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):46-50. doi: 10.2319/121007-579.1. — View Citation

Gibreal O, Hajeer MY, Brad B. Evaluation of the levels of pain and discomfort of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy when treating severely crowded lower anterior teeth: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0758-9. — View Citation

Jahanbin A, Hasanzadeh N, Khaki S, Shafaee H. Comparison of self-ligating Damon3 and conventional MBT brackets regarding alignment efficiency and pain experience: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Fall;13(4):281-288. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.043. — View Citation

Lai TT, Chiou JY, Lai TC, Chen T, Wang HY, Li CH, Chen MH. Perceived pain for orthodontic patients with conventional brackets or self-ligating brackets over 1 month period: A single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Jan;119(1 Pt 2):282-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jun 14. — View Citation

Tecco S, D'Attilio M, Tetè S, Festa F. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):380-4. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp003. Epub 2009 May 22. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in the levels of pain Patients will be asked this question about their feeling of pain (Item no 01):
'What is the degree of pain you have experienced?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the active phase of treatment. The patient will be asked to specify a point on the visual analogue scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: there is no pain - 100: the worst pain). The score will be determined by measuring the distance from the beginning until the point identified by the patient.
After 24 hours; 4 days; 7 days; 14 days; 28 days
Primary Change in the levels of discomfort Patients will be asked this question about their feeling of discomfort (Item no 02):
'What is the degree of discomfort you have experienced?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the active phase of treatment. The patient will be asked to specify a point on the visual analogue scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: there is no pain - 100: the worst pain). The score will be determined by measuring the distance from the beginning until the point identified by the patient.
After 24 hours; 4 days; 7 days; 14 days; 28 days
Primary Change in the Perception of swelling Patients will be asked this question about their feeling of swelling (Item no 03):
'What is the degree of swelling you have experienced?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the active phase of treatment. The patient will be asked to specify a point on the visual analogue scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: there is no pain - 100: the worst pain). The score will be determined by measuring the distance from the beginning until the point identified by the patient.
After 24 hours; 4 days; 7 days; 14 days; 28 days
Primary Change in the difficulty of mastication 'What is the degree of mastication difficulties you have experienced?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the active phase of treatment. The patient will be asked to specify a point on the visual analogue scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: there is no pain - 100: the worst pain). The score will be determined by measuring the distance from the beginning until the point identified by the patient. After 24 hours; 4 days; 7 days; 14 days; 28 days
Primary Change in the difficulty of swallowing Patients will be asked this question about their feeling of swallowing (Item no 05):
'What is the degree of swallowing difficulties you have experienced?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the active phase of treatment. The patient will be asked to specify a point on the visual analogue scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: there is no pain - 100: the worst pain). The score will be determined by measuring the distance from the beginning until the point identified by the patient.
After 24 hours; 4 days; 7 days; 14 days; 28 days
Primary Change in the perception of the jaw movement restriction Patients will be asked this question about their feeling of the jaw movement restriction (Item no 06):
'What is the degree of the jaw movement restriction you have experienced?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the active phase of treatment. The patient will be asked to specify a point on the visual analogue scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: there is no pain - 100: the worst pain). The score will be determined by measuring the distance from the beginning until the point identified by the patient.
After 24 hours; 4 days; 7 days; 14 days; 28 days
Primary The levels of satisfaction Patients will be asked this question about their levels of satisfaction (Item no 07): 'What is your levels of satisfaction on the orthodontic treatment provided?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the active phase of treatment. The patient will be asked to specify a point on the visual analogue scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: there is no satisfaction- 100: the highest satisfaction). The score will be determined by measuring the distance from the beginning until the point identified by the patient. This outcome will be assessed at 28 days following the beginning of treatment
Primary Recommendation of the procedure to a friend Patients will be asked this question (Item no 08): 'Would you recommend a friend undergo this treatment?' Assessment will be performed using a two-point scale to answer yes or no. This outcome will be assessed at 28 days following the beginning of treatment
Primary The possibility of repeating the procedure Patients will be asked this question about the possibility of repeating the procedure (Item no 09): 'Would you accept to undergo this treatment again?' Assessment will be performed using a two-point scale to answer yes or no. This outcome will be assessed at 28 days following the beginning of treatment
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05500456 - The Effectiveness of Clear Aligner and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Achieving Good Occlusion in Complex Orthodontic Cases N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05664282 - Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth N/A
Completed NCT05250921 - Evaluation of the Patient Experience With a Surgically-assisted Acceleration Method of Orthodontic Treatment N/A
Recruiting NCT04151875 - Effect of Extraction Vs Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment on Vertical Facial Dimension N/A
Completed NCT04347018 - BRIUS Vs FFA Efficiency N/A
Completed NCT05010616 - Evaluating the Influence of Showing Patients Their Predicted Teeth Alignment on Their Expectations and Satisfaction N/A
Completed NCT03310086 - Acceleration of Lower Anterior Teeth Leveling and Alignment Using Corticision N/A
Completed NCT05390320 - Dental and Periodontal Changes Following the Acceleration of Alignment of Crowded Lower Anterior Teeth Using a Surgical Technique N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05469451 - Effect of the Diode Laser (940nm) on Orthodontics N/A
Completed NCT04070001 - The Effects of Ibuprofen and Laser on Orthodontic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04887974 - Canine Retraction With Temporary Anchorage Devices N/A
Recruiting NCT04905004 - Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals N/A