View clinical trials related to Covid19.
Filter by:To assess blood levels of vasoactive mediators that may regulate pulmonary endothelial permeability and contribute to multi-organ injury in patients with COVID-19 disease and to correlate the levels of these mediators with disease outcomes such as ICU admission, length of ventilatory support, respiratory failure, kidney failure, heart failure, and death.
Lifespan Cancer Institute serves over 50% of cancer patients in the state. Rhode Island is known for strong medical care and high rates of cancer screening with mammography and colonoscopy. However, cancer screening has plummeted during the COVID-19 pandemic, in part to closing physician offices and stopping non-urgent medical procedures. In addition, anecdotal reports suggest the public remains concerned about returning to physician's offices and risking possible exposure to COVID-19. As in the United States as a whole, COVID-19 has disproportionately impacted ethnic and minority individuals within underserved communities; and in Rhode Island, African Americans, Hispanics and undocumented individuals living in communities such as Central Falls, Pawtucket, Providence, East Providence and North Providence have had the highest rate of COVID-19. These communities are also impacted by healthcare disparities to access and affordability of healthcare, and as such, may be among the least likely to resume cancer screening. The Lifespan Cancer Institute will institute a project to address health disparities in cancer screening during the pandemic through the use of a targeted campaign involving social media. The goals will be to re-establish screening in the era of COVID-19 and ensure timeliness of care for those found to be at risk, or are positive for, cancer.
The investigators are enrolling 100 healthcare Provider volunteers (n=100) from across the United States to help to evaluate and document the financial impact of COVID-19 on Physicians and other healthcare Providers. This investigation will compare individual Physician revenues before and after the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. The investigators expect to be able to differentiate between revenues lost due to the COVID-19-driven business recession and revenues lost due to the manipulation of reimbursement processes by insurance companies. The inextricable linkage between Payer and Physician revenues suggests that Payer revenues are higher at the direct expense of Physicians, since both streams come from the same sources of funding. The secondary objective is aimed at revealing the methods Payers use to retain more money.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a newly emerged disease, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The COVID-19 pandemic is having a large impact on the mental and physical health of patients, yet data on the quality of life of post-COVID-19 patients is lacking. There are currently no post-COVID-19 specific measures for quality of life, particularly none which include the views of post-COVID-19 patients themselves. This observational study will recruit participants to contribute their preferences to the creation of a post-COVID-19 specific patient-reported measure on post-COVID-19 quality of life. Participants will be split into three groups: those who were not hospitalised; those who were hospitalised but not in intensive care units; and those who were hospitalised and in intensive care units. The creation of this measure will form phase 1 of the study, with 30-60 participants (10-20 in each group above) recruited to complete online surveys to find out their preferences of areas of life to include in such a measure. This will involve 3 online surveys, 1) to ask which areas of life they feel are impacted and how; 2) to find consensus about the areas to be included; 3) to weight the relevance of these areas in relation to each other. In phase 2 recruitment will open to additional participants and all participants will be asked to complete the finalised post-COVID-19 quality of life measure once a month for 12 months, aiming for a minimum of 100 participants at this stage. All participants will also be asked to complete a demographic questionnaire to inform the analysis of the data.
This phase2/3 study will be conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Meplazumab in addition to Standard of Care for the treatment of Corona Virus Disease(COVID) 19 in hospitalized adults
Between March and May 2020, Ile-de-France hospitals faced an influx of patients infected with the COVID 19 virus. Faced with the scale of the pandemic, the aggressiveness of this pathology, severe respiratory complications and the shortage of resuscitation beds , the teams had to make difficult decisions on the therapeutic strategy, the orientation of patients in the event of respiratory distress and their intensive care status. To do this, each establishment reflected in an emergency context on procedures for collegial deliberation and assistance in ethical reflection, based on the recommendations of the National Consultative Ethics Committee and learned societies such as the French Society. of Anesthesia and Resuscitation or the French Society of Support and Palliative Care. Some hospitals had already institutionalized the ethical approach upstream of the health crisis. For example, the Groupe d'Aide à la Réflexion Éthique Clinique (GAREC) was created in November 2005 within the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group. GAREC is a collegial and multidisciplinary entity, made up of 8 members who intervene at the request of caregivers when a clinical situation turns out to be ethically complex. He gives an advisory opinion, the decision belonging to the referring physician. At the start of the COVID period, GAREC changed its structure, organization and operation in order to respond to the multiple issues posed by the complexity of the health situation. This study seeks to analyze the adaptation mechanisms put in place by this group during the epidemic period as well as the nature of the benefit provided to the caregivers who requested it, to the patients and to their relatives. - Adaptation mechanisms: during the COVID period, GAREC was extended to other paramedical professions (psychologists, nurses), thus increasing from 8 to 15 members. It has set up 2 weekly meetings, an on-call duty and on-call duty. The requests were made easier: they could be done by phone, by email, day or night. Several questions emerge: What were the motivations for enlarging the group? How were the members integrated into this group? What were its operating methods? How and by whom was it seized? For what purpose? Were the intervention teams multidisciplinary? - Nature of the benefit provided by GAREC: it will be approached by semi-structured interviews via a qualitative research method. This work is part of a broader reflective perspective: - What representation of ethics underlies this device? - Does the institutionalization of ethics help to enhance or make invisible what ethics owes to daily healthcare practices? - To what extent does the institutionalization of clinical ethics make health institutions more human and virtuous? - Under what conditions can a device like GAREC go beyond the role of ethical guarantor and transform the institution and nursing practices in the service of a collective reflective approach? This study will be carried out on patient data usually collected as part of their care and on data collected through semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals. As such, it fits into the perspective of grounded theory.
Study conducted on hospitalized patient in critical ill units in Nancy and Metz to evaluate if early corticosteroid treatment in first seven days after admission improve patients outcome in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome secondary to Covid-19 compared to later corticosteroid therapy or no treatment. Also comparison of acquired infection with or without corticosteroid treatment during hospitalisation.
Little is known regarding the effect of antenatal COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine of COVID-19 alters histopathology and gene expression of the placenta, as evidenced by analysis at time of delivery. The analysis will aim to identify whether resulting abnormal placental pathology or altered metabolism is associated with severity of symptoms (specifically pneumonia, or need for admission), gestational age at onset, and/or placenta efficiency. Histological and gene expression analysis of the placental post-delivery will determine if COVID-19 alters overall placental structure, vascularization, and/or the transcriptome.
The proposed trial will obtain preliminary data on the feasibility of studying RTB101 as compared to placebo for COVID-19 post-exposure prophylaxis in adults age ≥ 65 years to inform the design of a subsequent pivotal trial.
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety, PK profile, and efficacy of COVI-AMG in subjects with COVID-19.