View clinical trials related to Covid19.
Filter by:The goal of this feasibility study is to evaluate the use of the Ghostly app in rehabilitation of stroke patients, elderly and patients recovering from COVID-19 or ICU patients. In three randomized controlled trials, the effect of a strength training program incorporated in the Ghostly app will be assessed for 1) stroke patients suffering from weakness of the lower limb, 2) frail elderly with gait difficulties and 3) patients recovering from COVID-19 or ICU patients who suffer from muscle weakness. Additionally, the effect of BFR on strength gain in all these three populations will be tested.
Numerous scientific agencies and iraqi MOH has advised to promote population vaccination as an attempt to reduce the burden of COVID19. The aim of our study is to evaluate knowledge, Attitude, practice and concerns toward different type of covid19 vaccine of Iraqi population. This will help us concentrate our efforts to increase Willingness of vaccination among southren Iraqi people
While the pandemic continues to incite panic and the guideline recommendations regarding management of COVID continue to change, we have growing evidence that ARDS secondary to Covid-19 is associated with disseminated intravascular and alveolar fibrin deposition1. Strategies devised to reduce mucous and fibrin plugs will greatly help in preventing patients from progressing to invasive ventilation2 which if happens will obviously overburden the compromised intensive care facilities. Offering heparin in nebulized form has greatly reduced levels of coagulation activation in the lungs both in animal studies and in patients with acute lung injury3. As Heparin prevents further fibrin deposition but is ineffective in the removal of pre-existing fibrin plug, so early use of heparin during the course of the disease may help in limiting the complications of ARDS and hence reducing the burden faced by our intensive care units. A prospective randomized controlled trial will be carried out in patients admitted to COVID complex to see its effects on disease progression and its role in preventing patients from progressing to require Invasive Mechanical Ventilation while being administered through local route rather than systemic. Moreover, it will also give insight and way forward regarding the improvement in the survival and earlier discharge
Investigators will measure the level of anxiety and fear of Covid during the balneological treatment in patients. They are interested in the effect of general trust and resilience on the level of anxiety state.
The newly recognised disease COVID-19 is caused by the Severe-AcuteRespiratory-Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which rapidly spread globally in late 2019, reaching pandemic proportions. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection is broad, encompassing asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory tract illness and mild extrapulmonary symptoms, and severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure and even death. For COVID-19, most primary care physicians have initially treated their patients according to their judgment, with various treatment regimens they believe are most appropriate based on their experience/expertise. We recently published a note on how we were treating patients at home based on the pathophysiology underlining the mild/moderate symptoms at the onset of the illness and the proposal of simple drugs that theoretically better fir these mechanisms. Because the common early mild symptoms of COVID-19 highlight a systemic inflammatory process, there is the recommendation of using anti-inflammatory agents to limit excessive host inflammatory responses to the viral infection, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids. Moreover, COVID-19 patients are exposed to the risk of thromboembolic events and anticoagulant prophylaxis is recommended even at home, in particular settings, unless contraindicated. In an academic matched-cohort study, we found that early treatment of COVID-19 patients at home by their family doctors according to the proposed recommendation regimen almost completely prevented the need for hospital admission (the most clinically relevant outcome of the study along with death) due to progression toward more severe illness (2 out of 90 patients), compared to patients in the 'control' cohort who were treated at home according to their family physician's assessments (13 out of 90 patients). However, the rate of hospitalization was a secondary outcome of the study and the possibility of a casual finding cannot be definitely excluded. Moreover, these findings were achieved in a retrospective observational study with two matched cohorts of COVID-19 patients, a possible additional limitation of the robustness of the conclusions that would deserve further validation. Thus, we have considered the observed reduction in patient hospitalization a hypothesis generating finding to be confirmed. In this pragmatic, prospective, three-months, cluster randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) clinical trial, we will compare two groups of family doctors according to a randomized approach, who will treat their COVID19-patients with the proposed recommendation algorithm or other treatment regimens they normally feel appropriate according to their usual clinical practice, and monitor them longitudinally up to 3 months. Our working hypothesis is that following the proposed recommendation algorithm the early COVID-19-related inflammatory process is limited, preventing the need of hospital admission at larger extent than with other therapeutic approaches also targeting early symptoms of the illness at home. Should the findings be confirmed, the tested standardized treatment protocol would achieve major benefits for patients with early COVID-19 in particular in relation to a remarkably reduced risk of hospitalization that is expected to translate into reduced morbility and, possibly, mortality. Notably, these expected clinical benefits would be associated with remarkably reduced treatment costs related to reduced hospitalization.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of intranasal "Gam-COVID-Vak" combined vector vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The duration of participation in the study for one subject will be 180±14 days after the first dose of vaccine, during which each subject will undergo a screening visit (within a week) and face-to-face visits according to the study plan. Intranasal vaccine administration will be done at day 1 vaccination visits and day 21±2 days on an outpatient basis. During the follow-up visits key vital signs will be assessed, and will collect data on changes in the state and well-being subjects from a previous visit. Subject data will be collected using electronic forms of individual registration cards, as well as with using questionnaires (diaries) filled by the subjects of the study. Immunogenicity will be assessed on day 1, 10, 28, 42 and 90 days. Humoral and cellular immune response will be evaluated.
In December 2019, a cluster of pneumonia cases, caused by a newly identified βcoronavirus, occurred in Wuhan, China.1 The World Health Organization (WHO) officially named the disease as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses named the virus as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).2 On 11 March 2020, the WHO declared the epidemic of COVID-19 as a pandemic.3 The pandemic crisis prioritises critical care for those coronavirus (COVID-19) patients who have been most profoundly affected, and hospitals, staffing, and working practices have been radically adjusted to accommodate this.4,5 The healthcare industry, in particular, has been overwhelmed by the effect of COVID-19 on healthcare resources. This has been underscored by providers concerned about emotional strain and physical exhaustion, access to personal protective equipment (PPE) and medical equipment, workplace exposure to COVID-19 and disease transmission to family members.6 Physicians are essential for any health-care system and at the frontline defense against the COVID-19 pandemic. They play a crucial role in diagnosis, treatment, prevention of disease spread, and public education during this pandemic. Moreover, they are frequently exposed to infected individuals with COVID-19, making them at higher risk of infection than others.7 Anesthesia is one such specialty whose residents are uniquely at risk of exposure to infection in the operating room or ICU. Residents reported that their learning schedule is distorted in our hospital regarding skills because of increase ICU rotations, cancelled elective surgeries, missing one or two of the major rotations. Also, lecturers were stopped and replaced by E-learning after a long period. Examination schedule was changed and so the research schedule. Infection of the trainees (or a member of a family) had a great emotional and physical impact on them. COVID-19 will not go away any time soon, and therefore the new balance between service provision and training needs to be agreed in a sensitive way to avoid further frustration amongst trainees. Adaptations to these circumstances have delivered new forms of teaching and supervision. We design this cross-sectional study and implement a survey that included a 58-question to accomplish the specific aims of the present study through comparisons of two groups of residents and to provide plans for the training programme to be less affected by pandemics.
This is a Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to evaluate the effects of the drug MYMD1, a novel Immuno-Metabolic Regulator, for its antidepressant and antianxiety properties, in addition to its anti-inflammatory effects, in patients with Post-Acute Sequelae of Coronavirus Disease-2019. The investigators' hope is that this drug will help treat the depressive and anxiety symptoms in post-COVID-19 patients and any post-COVID-19 inflammatory complications. The total duration of the study will be a maximum of 40 days-involving enrollment (1 day), an active treatment phase (10 days) during which participants will either receive 300mg of MYMD1, 600mg of MYMD1, or a placebo, and a remote monitoring phase (28 days).
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has been a global pandemic since March 2020. According to WHO, more than 289 million cases have been confirmed worldwide, with just over 5.4 million reported deaths as of January 2022. SARS-CoV-2 variants continue to emerge, with the omicron variant causing the increased surge in cases. Currently, Johns Hopkins University of Medicine reports a case fatality rate of 1.5% for the United States. COVID-19 infections may be asymptomatic in some cases, while most cases cause mild to moderate illness with respiratory and flu-like symptoms. However, a significant number of COVID-19 cases develop severe life-threatening illness involving severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) Although there have been breakthroughs in the treatment for COVID-19, most of these are directed at mild-to-moderate disease rather than patients with severe disease on mechanical ventilators. There is still a need for novel and effective treatment options in severe COVID-19 illness with continued vaccine hesitancy, decreased social distancing, and new emerging variants. Centhaquine is a first-in-class resuscitative agent for the hypovolemic shock that is approved for marketing in India. Centhaquine has been found to be an effective resuscitative agent in rat, rabbit, and swine models of hemorrhagic shock. Its safety and tolerability have been demonstrated in a human phase I study in 25 subjects (CTRI/2014/06/004647). Clinical phase II (CTRI/2017/03/008184) and phase III (CTRI/2019/01/017196) results indicate that centhaquine is a novel first-in-class, highly effective resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock. Centhaquine provided hemodynamic stability and significantly improved acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) in clinical trials conducted in India. A total of 155 patients with hypovolemic shock have been studied (combined phase II and III). Centhaquine is safe and reduced the mortality from 10.71% in patients receiving standard treatment to 2.20% in patients that received centhaquine (odds ratio 5.340; 95% CI 1.270-26.50; P=0.0271). In a phase 3 study of hypovolemic shock, ARDS and MODS were secondary endpoints, and centhaquine reduced both with a significant p-value.
The objective of study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of SCTV01C or SCTV01E as booster compared with Sinopharm inactivated COVID-19 vaccine as booster. The study will also evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of 2-dose vaccinations.