There are about 1295 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Lithuania. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The study will evaluate the immunogenicity, safety and efficacy of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in oncohematological patient population and compare the results with patients without prior oncohematological disease. The study is comprised of retrospective and prospective parts. In retrospective part, biobanked residual biological patient material and data will be used. In prospective part, vaccinated oncohematological patients and vaccinated patients without prior oncohematological disease will be invited to participate in long-term follow-up. The subjects will be invited for blood sample collection every three months from the second vaccine dose administration, i.e. 3 mos., 6 mos., 9 mos. etc. When the study subject receives booster dose, additional blood samples for immunogenicity analyses will be collected up to 14 days before and 4-8 weeks after the booster vaccine dose. The follow-up time points occurring every three months will be counted from the last vaccine's dose. Ten time points in total will be collected and tested for humoral and cellular immunogenicity. For safety analysis patient self-documented systemic events (fever, fatigue, headache, chills, vomiting, diarrhea, new or worsened muscle pain, and new or worsened joint pain) occurring up to 7 days following each vaccine dose will be systematized and compared between oncohematological patients and healthy individuals. For efficacy analysis, polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR) confirmed symptomatic disease rates, hospitalization rates and mortality rates will be assessed.
This is a prospective, single arm, multicenter study in an expanding cohort of 150 symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who will be followed up for up to 5 years.
This is a pivotal Phase II randomised, multi-centre, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MB-CART2019.1 compared to standard of care therapy in participants with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.
The study will aim to estimate the efficacy of apremilast compared with placebo in the treatment of juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) in pediatric participants 5 to less than 18 years of age.
Vedolizumab is a medicine that helps to reduce inflammation and pain in the digestive system. In this study, children and teenagers with moderate to severe Crohn's disease will be treated with vedolizumab. The main aim of the study is to check if participants achieve remission after treatment with the vedolizumab. Remission means symptoms improve or disappear and an endoscopy shows no signs of inflammation. Participants will receive 3 infusions of vedolizumab over 6 weeks. Then, those who have a clinical response will receive either a high dose or low dose of vedolizumab once every 8 weeks. They will receive the same dose every time.
The aim of this study is to evaluate functional and physical capacity, health-related quality of life and associations with frailty in older patients after ischemic heart disease and interventional treatment with an individualized physical training program in the second phase of cardiac rehabilitation.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of drug-eluting balloon angioplasty and vein bypass surgery in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia due to infrapopliteal arterial disease.
Primary Objective: Primary population (former smokers cohort): - Evaluate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on the annualized rate of acute moderate-or-severe COPD exacerbations in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD Secondary Objectives: Primary population (former smokers cohort): - Evaluate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on pulmonary function in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on occurrence of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on severe AECOPD in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on corticosteroid-treated AECOPD in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on respiratory symptoms in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) slope in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as assessed by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate the safety and tolerability of itepekimab in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of itepekimab in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Evaluate immunogenicity to itepekimab in former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD Secondary population (current smokers cohort) - Estimate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on the annualized rate of acute moderate or severe COPD exacerbations in current smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Estimate the efficacy of itepekimab compared with placebo on pulmonary function in current smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Estimate the safety and tolerability of itepekimab in current smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD - Estimate the PK profile of itepekimab in current smokers with moderate to severe COPD - Estimate immunogenicity to itepekimab in current smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD
This study is an open-label, single arm, multicenter, roll-over extension study to characterize long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of iptacopan and to provide access to iptacopan to patients with PNH who have completed Novartis-sponsored Phase 2 or 3 studies with iptacopan
The purpose of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Hypothesis (H1): Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab plus olaparib is superior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy alone with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 by BICR. Hypothesis (H2): Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab is superior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy alone with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 by BICR. Hypothesis (H3): Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab plus olaparib is superior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy alone with respect to OS. Hypothesis (H4): Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab is superior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy alone with respect to OS.