There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Primary objective is to assess the anti-tumor activity of single agent odronextamab as measured by the objective response rate (ORR) according to the Lugano Classification of response in malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2014) and as assessed by independent central review in each of the following B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) subgroups: - In patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 1-3a *1,2 - In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) *1,2 - In patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) that has relapsed after or is refractory to a BTK inhibitor. This cohort will also include patients who have relapsed or have disease refractory to prior systemic therapy, or patients who have demonstrated intolerance to BTK inhibitor therapy, and who have progressed after other systemic therapy. - In patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) *1 - In patients with other B-NHL subtypes *1 Secondary objectives are: - To assess the anti-tumor activity of single agent odronextamab in each of 5 disease-specific cohorts, as measured by: - ORR according to the Lugano Classification and as assessed by local investigator evaluation - Complete response (CR) rate according to the Lugano Classification and as assessed local by local investigator evaluation and independent central review - Progression-free survival (PFS)*3 - Overall survival (OS) - Duration of response (DOR)*3 - Disease control rate (DCR)*3 - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of odronextamab - To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of odronextamab - To assess the immunogenicity of odronextamab - To assess the effect of odronextamab on patient reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQL), as measured by the validated instruments European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym), and EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) - 1 that has relapsed after or is refractory to at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy - 2 including an anti-CD20 antibody and an alkylating agent - 3 according to Lugano Classification and as assessed by independent central review and local investigator evaluation
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of patiromer compared with placebo on serum K+ in HF patients.
The study is conducted to improve knowledge about the epidemiology of Lipoprotein(a) in patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD).
This study will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of lecanemab in participants with early Alzheimer's disease (EAD) by determining the superiority of lecanemab compared with placebo on the change from baseline in the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) at 18 months of treatment in the Core Study. This study will also evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of lecanemab in participants with EAD in the Extension Phase and whether the long-term effects of lecanemab as measured by the CDR-SB at the end of the Core Study is maintained over time in the Extension Phase.
This study is open to people with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). People can only take part if they have completed treatment in a previous study with spesolimab (1368-0013 or 1368-0027). The goal of this study is to find out how well people with GPP tolerate long-term treatment with spesolimab. The study also tests whether spesolimab helps improve GPP symptoms and how quickly the symptoms improve after a flare-up. Every participant gets spesolimab for almost 5 years (252 weeks). Depending on their symptoms and whether they had a GPP flare during the previous trial, they get spesolimab every few weeks. When participants have a GPP flare during this trial, they get spesolimab as an infusion into a vein. Participants visit their doctors regularly. During these visits, the doctors collect information on any health problems of the participants. To assess the study endpoints, doctors regularly check participants' skin.
A unique approach for cancer treatment employing intratumoral diffusing alpha radiation emitter device for superficial cutaneous, mucosal or soft tissue neoplasia
This clinical study will evaluate the short-term (1- and 2-year) and medium term (5-year) safety and performance of the ANTHEM™ CR Total Knee System in patients with non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease of the knee requiring total knee replacement. Clinical, radiographic, Health Economic Outcomes and safety outcomes will be evaluated.
Although advances in neonatal care have improved survival and reduced complications in preterm infants, sepsis still contributes significantly to mortality and in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), in particular for very-low-birth-weight (VLBW, <1500 g) and extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW, <1000g). Based on the timing of the infection neonatal sepsis has been classified into early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset sepsis (LOS), with differences in the mode of transmission and predominant organisms. EOS is defined as onset in the first 3 days of life generally due to vertical transmission of bacteria from mothers to infants during the intrapartum period. LOS occurs after 3 days of life and it is attributed to pathogens acquired postnatally (horizontal transmission). Considering generally neonatal sepsis in Europe, 90% of the responsible bacteria resulted to be: Streptococcus agalactiae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, e Listeria monocytogenes. The diagnosis is difficult because clinical signs, particularly early in the course of disease, are subtle and nonspecific, and laboratory tests and blood culture are not always reliable. Moreover. blood culture (considered the 'gold standard) takes 48-72 hours for result. In fact the cultural method requires the presence of living and vital germs, depends on the volume of the sample - serious problem in neonatal population -, several hours are needed to process the sample, possibly resulting falsely negative in subjects undergoing concomitant antibiotic treatment or a false positive result can be found by contamination. The method based on molecular biology does not require living germs and, therefore, is not characterised by the sensitivity limitations. Such method can result to be extremely effective in patients receiving antibiotic therapy. In the present study, when an infant has to undergone blood sample for bacteria culture to verify a possible sepsis, a residual blood (200µl) is processed in the same time using a kit based on molecular biology. This kit is designed to obtain the highest sensitivity and specificity in the determination of most invasive bacterial diseases (meningitis, sepsis, pneumonia, etc.) affecting full-term, preterm infants to determine any presence of bacterial DNA belonging to all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes. The target bacteria have been chosen on the basis of the current Italian epidemiological context, so as to include germs causing about 90% of the meningitis/sepsis cases among the neonatal population. The detection system can unmistakably identify the germ against which it is directed and without causing any cross-reaction with other germs or human DNA.. The results obtained with this method have demonstrated a 100% specificity (no false positive result) The sensitivity of this method compared with the cultural method has turned out to be twice as high. The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of the blood culture method and the kit for molecular detection of bacterial DNA (all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes) considering the relevant epidemiology of our NICU, in order to verify the relative frequency of sepsis (EOS and LOS) caused by the target bacteria on the whole frequency of the bacteria responsible of all the sepsis in our ward.
Multi-center, international, prospective, open-label, single-arm, first-in-human clinical investigation. The Patients enrolled in this clinical investigation will undergo a scheduled surgery for the treatment of long bone defects up to 6 cm using GreenBone Implant. After the surgery, the Patients will be monitored at pre-scheduled visits up to 12 months. Adverse events, pain, quality of life and functional parameters, as well as X-ray and CT scan, will be evaluated at scheduled follow-up visits. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will review the safety reports at regular intervals and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) as soon as reported, to protect Patients participating in the study. The initial phase of the study contemplates the treatment of bone defects up to 3 cm. An adaptive interim analysis will be performed when the first 7 Patients will have completed the 6-month follow-up visit. The DSMB will review the results of the interim analysis with respect to the primary endpoint (safety), and provide one of the following recommendations to the Sponsor: a) to stop the study for unacceptable frequency and severity of adverse events or b) to continue the study up to 25 Patients recruited and to include at least 5 Patients with a longer bone defect (> 3 cm up to 6 cm).
The purpose of this international multicenter, patient and outcome-assessor blinded randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the application of an individualized high PEEP strategy, aiming at avoiding an increase in the driving pressure during intraoperative ventilation, protects against the development of postoperative pulmonary complications.