There are about 5241 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Hungary. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to confirm the clinical efficacy and the safety of P-3074 in participants with androgenetic alopecia.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of K-877 in adult patients with fasting high triglyceride levels ≥500 mg/dL and <2000 mg/dL and normal renal function.
A randomized withdrawal study in which responders to open-label treatment with tofacitinib will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to tofacitinib or placebo in a double-blind phase. In the double-blind phase "time to sJIA flare" will be evaluated as primary endpoint and subjects will be discontinued once they experience sJIA flare. An interim analysis for efficacy and futility will be conducted when at least 20 flares have been observed. If either criterion is met, the study will be stopped. If neither criterion is met, the study will continue until the requisite number of flares are observed as determined by the number of flares included in the interim analysis and a statistical penalty for conducting the interim analysis.
This is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double blind, double dummy, placebo and active-controlled, parallel group study to assess the efficacy and safety of PF 06650833 at Week 12 in subjects with moderate-severe, active, RA who have had an inadequate response to MTX. PF-06650833 or matching placebo tablets will be administered orally QD under fasting conditions, and tofacitinib or matching tofacitinib placebo tablets will be administered orally BID for 12 weeks in a blinded fashion.
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CCX168 (avacopan) to induce and sustain remission in patients with active anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), when used in combination with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine, or in combination with rituximab.
The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with bempedoic acid (ETC-1002) versus placebo decreases the risk of cardiovascular events in participants who have or are at high risk for cardiovascular disease and are statin intolerant.
Primary Objective: To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in participants with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the Overall Response Rate (ORR) as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria in each arm. - To compare the Overall Survival (OS) between the two arms. - To evaluate the Time To Progression (TTP) in each arm. - To evaluate the PFS in high risk cytogenetic population in each arm. - To evaluate the Duration of Response (DOR) in each arm. - To evaluate the safety in both treatment arms. - To determine the Pharmacokinetic profile of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab. - To assess disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQL), disease and treatment-related symptoms, health state utility, and health status.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the mass balance, absorption, metabolism, and elimination pathways of orally administered [14C] rucaparib followed by cycle by cycle treatment with rucaparib continuing until disease progression or other reason for discontinuation
The MR308-3501 study is a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study in male and female adult subjects to demonstrate the efficacy of MR308 in the treatment of acute moderate to severe pain after the extraction of at least two third molars requiring bone removal.
The study is a prospective randomised controlled study. The patients get monolateral IOL implantation of POD F GF and POD F in the contralateral eye. Both IOLs are trifocal IOLs consisting of the same optical design. The difference between the IOLs is the material (hydrophilic and hydrophobic). To decide which eye receives POD F and which eye receives POD F GF, a randomization table will be provided to the principle investigator.