There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Crohn's disease (CD) is a relapsing-remitting condition that requires lifelong monitoring. Non-invasive tests such as faecal calprotectin (FC) are more acceptable to patients and cost-effective than invasive tests such as colonoscopy. FC levels can also accurately predict the degree of healing seen within the bowel at colonoscopy. FC testing is labour intensive, and results are often indeterminate. There is interest in a newer test called quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Testing (qFIT) in patients with CD. qFIT measures the amount of blood within the stool and is used in the Scottish Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. qFIT is an easier and more acceptable test for patients and is less labour intensive and cheaper for the lab to process than FC. qFIT is a useful test to 'rule-out' significant colorectal pathology including bowel cancer, high risk polyps and inflammatory bowel disease in patients in the primary care setting. It has also been used to predict the degree of healing seen within the bowel at colonoscopy and to predict the risk of relapse in patients with UC, but not in CD. There are no studies in the UK to date comparing FIT to FC as a monitoring test in patients with well-controlled CD. Unpublished audit data from our group has suggested that low serum zinc has higher predictive accuracy at determining risk of future flare than both FC and CRP; we are unsure if this is due to higher faecal losses in 'grumbling' CD patients. This study could identify a cheaper, more acceptable and easier to interpret test to guide disease activity monitoring, flare risk and treatment decisions in quiescent CD.
RIO is a placebo-controlled double-blinded two arm prospective phase II randomised controlled trial . This study will test the use of broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs) in participants with treated primary HIV infection (PHI).
Modelling repurposed from pandemic influenza is currently informing all strategies for SARS-CoV-2 and the disease COVID-19. A customized disease specific understanding will be important to understand subsequent disease waves, vaccine development and therapeutics. For this reason, ISARIC (the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium) was set up in advance. This focuses on hospitalised and convalescent serum samples to understand severe illness and associated immune response. However, many subjects are seroconverting with mild or even subclinical disease. Information is needed about subclinical infection, the significance of baseline immune status and the earliest immune changes that may occur in mild disease to compare with those of SARS-CoV-2. There is also a need to understand the vulnerability and response to COVID-19 of the NHS workforce of healthcare workers (HCWs). HCW present a cohort with likely higher exposure and seroconversion rates than the general population, but who can be followed up with potential for serial testing enabling an insight into early disease and markers of risk for disease severity. We have set up "COVID-19: Healthcare worker Bioresource: Immune Protection and Pathogenesis in SARS-CoV-2". This urgent fieldwork aims to secure significant (n=400) sampling of healthcare workers (demographics, swabs, blood sampling) at baseline, and weekly whilst they are well and attending work, with acute sampling (if hospitalised, via ISARIC, if their admission hospital is part of the ISARIC network) and convalescent samples post illness. These will be used to address specific questions around the impact of baseline immune function, the earliest immune responses to infection, and the biology of those who get non-hospitalized disease for local research and as a national resource. The proposal links directly with other ongoing ISARIC and community COVID projects sampling in children and the older age population. Reasonable estimates suggest the usable window for baseline sampling of NHS HCW is closing fast (e.g. baseline sampling within 3 weeks).
The purpose of this study is to find out whether hydroxychloroquine, in addition to background treatments, reduces disease activity in patients with Anti-Neutrophilic Cytoplasmic Autoantibodies (ANCA) Vasculitis, a group of autoimmune diseases. Hydroxychloroquine and is an established, effective, safe and inexpensive therapy, widely used in other autoimmune diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. The study is open to adults diagnosed with certain types of vasculitis, called Granulomatosis Polyangiitis (GPA), Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA) or Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA). Participants will be eligible if they are treated with background medication to control their vasculitis disease and have a low level of disease activity as defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) of greater than 3. Participants will be randomly placed in 1 of 2 groups. Both groups will be given background medication. One group will receive hydroxychloroquine and the other will receive placebo. Participants will be on treatment for 1 year. 76 ANCA Vasculitis participants will be recruited (38 in each treatment arm) from UK vasculitis specialist centres.
This project aims to use artificial intelligence (image discrimination) algorithms, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for scanning chest radiographs in the emergency department (triage) in patients with suspected respiratory symptoms (fever, cough, myalgia) of coronavirus infection COVID 19. The objective is to create and validate a software solution that discriminates on the basis of the chest x-ray between Covid-19 pneumonitis and influenza
Inherited cardiac conditions (ICC) comprise any hereditary condition which may affect cardiac muscle, vasculature, or conductive system. These conditions sometimes present with sudden cardiac death, and may have significant implications for families. Whilst their prevalence may be rare, our understanding of these conditions has increased over the past decade. ICC Clinics aim to improve the diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of these patients. The NIH has defined a biomarker as "a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention". Biomarkers can indicate disease characteristics, including markers of clinical disease, or indicators of therapeutic response. This study aims to investigate the utility of biomarkers in a large cohort of patients who are attending the ICC clinic. Biomarkers will be related to the presence and severity of cardiovascular disease and other markers of cardiac disease.
The aim of this study is to identify factors responsible for recurrent shoulder instability in children. Shoulder instability, i.e. complete or partial dislocation of the shoulder joint, is common in children, resulting in pain and disability. Recurrent instability can damage the shoulder joint resulting in the premature development of arthritis. Rehabilitation approaches are preferred over surgical methods for the growing child e.g. physiotherapy to restore movement and prevent further instability. Existing rehabilitation procedures are based on addressing factors assumed to be responsible for instability e.g. physiotherapists may try to increase shoulder stability by building up the shoulder muscles to compensate for the damaged ligaments. It is evident however that the mechanisms of shoulder instability are not well understood, as failure rates for physiotherapy are high, with 70% - 90% of children continuing to suffer recurrent instability. This is an observational, cross-sectional study of children (aged 8 to 18) presenting with shoulder instability of any origin, traumatic or atraumatic (n=15) and an age-matched sample (n=15) with no history of shoulder problems. Muscle activity and movement pattern differences will be measured using non-invasive 3D motion capture and surface electromyography, to identify factors responsible for instability. Only a single visit to the site will be required (The Orthotic Research & Locomotor Assessment Unit (ORLAU) based at The Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in Oswestry.). If investigators better understand the mechanisms associated with instability, physiotherapy interventions to reduce dislocations and disability can be better targeted. If specific patterns of activity associated with instability are identified, these could be addressed through personalised and improved exercise prescription and rehabilitation. Additionally, causes of instability for which physiotherapy may not be appropriate may be identified, therefore ensuring patients are referred to the correct service in a timely manner, improving patient outcomes and allocating physiotherapy resources more appropriately. Participants will be recruited from musculoskeletal/orthopaedic outpatient clinics. This study is funded by the Private Physiotherapy Education Foundation.
This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of Mental Health First Aid in the workplace. Half of the organisations will receive Mental Health First Aid training and half will receive treatment as usual (a brief consultation from Mental health First Aid England on mental health and well-being in the workplace).
Mycobacterium abscessus (MABS) is a group of rapid-growing, multi-drug resistant non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) causing infections in humans. MABS pulmonary disease (MABS-PD) can result in significant morbidity, increased healthcare utilisation, accelerated lung function decline, impaired quality of life, more challenging lung transplantation, and increased mortality. While the overall numbers affected is small, the prevalence of infections is increasing worldwide. The Finding the Optimal Regimen for Mycobacterium abscessus Treatment (FORMaT) trial aims to produce high quality evidence for the best treatment regimens to maximise health outcomes and minimise toxicity and treatment burden, as well as developing biomarkers (serology, gene expression signatures, and radiology) to guide decisions for starting treatment and measuring disease severity in patients with MABS PD.
Treatment decision-making capacity ('capacity') refers to a person's ability to make decisions about their treatment. It is an important issue for people diagnosed with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder ('psychosis') because impaired capacity can mean a person does not understand what treatment options are available, or the implications of those options. In 2018 the National Institute of Health & Care Excellence (NICE) called for clinical trials of interventions such as talking therapies to help people regain capacity. However, running these trials can take several years. One way of reducing this delay is to run several trials at the same time, as part of one bigger trial called an 'Umbrella' trial. Although Umbrella trials have been used to accelerate the development of physical health interventions, they have yet to be used in mental health. The main aims of this study are therefore to find out whether people with non-affective psychosis (schizophrenia-spectrum disorder) will take part in a single (rater) blind Umbrella trial of talking therapies to improve their treatment decision-making capacity (the DEC:IDES trial), and to understand their experiences of participation. Before a larger version of the DEC:IDES trial can begin, it needs to be established that people with psychosis will want to take part in it. Specifically, the aim of this study is to establish whether they will stay in the trial until it is finished, or whether they will leave early. It will also examine why people might leave DEC:IDES early, so that it can be improved. For these reasons, a smaller version must be completed first. This will involve 3 small clinical trials, each with N=20 (Treatment N=10; Control N=10), each testing 1 of 3 different interventions. Each intervention has been designed to help participants resolve a problem which previous evidence suggests may reduce their decision-making ability. One intervention is designed to improve self-esteem, another is designed to reduce negative beliefs about psychosis ('self-stigma') and another is designed to help people with psychosis gather more information before making decisions. The investigators will record how many people participate in and complete the trial, and they will ask people for their views on what they liked and did not like about taking part. All this information will help ensure the larger DEC:IDES trial is more acceptable to people with psychosis.