There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Background: There is significant variation in how clinicians currently present information to parents in periviable labour. Whilst each conversation with an individual set of parents will vary, the current level of variation is extreme. In collaborative discussions with the neonatal parental advisory group whilst designing this project, parents reported numerous experiences of significant variation in practice between clinicians in relation to periviable delivery management. There is a pressing issue of injustice here as the hospital or clinician the parent presents to in labour should not restrict their access to information and options for management at delivery. Parents should be empowered and engaged in making an individualised decision for their infant. However, this is not possible if information is not accurately presented to them. There is a gap in knowledge about what information is vital to include in periviable decision-making conversations between parents and healthcare professionals. This study aims to address this important gap in knowledge. Research Question: How can information sharing and decision-making conversations between healthcare professionals and parents prior to periviable birth be improved? Research Aims: 1. To gain understanding of current UK-wide antenatal optimisation practices for infants born at periviable gestations. 2. To establish an evidence-based conversational structure for pre-delivery periviable decision-making discussions, and a prioritised set of key discussion topics derived from parental consensus and clinician input. 3. To develop a set of parent and clinician derived recommendations to improve pre-delivery periviable decision-making conversations. Methodology: The study would progress along the following structure: 1. Literature Review of literature related to how and what information is presented to parents facing periviable labour by healthcare professionals. 2. Semi-structured interviews with clinicians and parents. The aim will be to determine an evidence-based set of priorities for each group and identify the differences in priorities and barriers that exist in communication between parents and clinicians. 3. National Evaluation of current periviable management practices across the UK. This will benchmark and expose variation in current practice. 4. Analysis of pre-delivery periviable conversations. 5. Focus groups with parents and clinicians to consolidate and stratify key priority themes for periviable decision-making conversations and assess acceptability of developing parent-centred periviable delivery resources. 6. Parent survey of parent-assessed long-term outcomes for periviable delivery survivors. Impact and Dissemination: This study will investigate the key topic areas and conversational structure of pre-delivery periviable decision-making conversations, aiming to provide evidence-based recommendations for improvement.
This is a retrospective and prospective, multi-center, international, post marketing follow-up study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Occlutech PDA by using Occlutech Occlusions-Pusher (OOP) in patients with patent ductus arteriosus defects. Efficacy and safety of implanted device(s) will be evaluated by vital signs, ECGs, and echocardiography data on baseline/implantation visit (include assessments within 36 hrs. post-procedure), Day 30 to Day 90, 6 months to 1 year, 2 years to 3 years after implantation.
This is a Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study in Orthopaedics. It will verify the long-term safety and performance of the device in the intended patient population, when indicated for the reconstruction of a ligament in the kneecap - the Medial Patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). The Medical Device in this study, Poly-Tape, is a Class IIb CE-Marked device manufactured by Xiros Ltd. Poly-tapes are a single-use device, they are indicated for patients repair of soft tissue and/or reconstruction of ligaments, tendons, and other soft tissues. The device can be fixed to the bone using several different methods including screws. This study is a prospective, multicentre, consecutively recruited non-randomised study. The total length of the study is expected to be 7 years. This includes a recruitment period of approximately 24 months and a 5-year follow-up. A total of 55 subjects will be enrolled into the study with follow up at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years in clinic and by questionnaires. All subjects treated with the Poly-Tape for MPFL reconstruction, will be consecutively recruited into the study.
This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab compared with mepolizumab in adults with relapsing or refractory EGPA receiving SoC therapy.
This study is an open-label, multicenter, Phase I/IIa, dose escalation, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) study of BNT142 followed by expansion cohorts in patients with Claudin 6 (CLDN6)-positive advanced tumors.
This trial will compare laparoscopic and robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs, using the Versius® system. We will initially aim to recruit 60 patients (20 patients in the laparoscopic arm and 40 in the robotic arm) in order to assess the ergonomic impact of each modality on the operating surgeon. This aims to provide in vivo information on whether robotic surgery provides any advantages to the operating surgeon. This trial will also be used to assess the feasibility of recruitment to a future larger study, and any data collected will be used as pilot data.
This is a study comparing major bowel surgery done via conventional keyhole (laparoscopic) surgery with robotic assisted keyhole surgery, using the Versius robotic system. Our main objective is to assess the physical strain of both types of surgery on the operating surgeon, but we will also collect data on the patient outcomes and teamwork. This results from this study will be used to guide the design of a larger scale trial in future.
Clinical study to investigate the efficacy and safety of savolitinib in combination with osimertinib versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in participants with EGFR mutated, MET-overexpressed and/or amplified, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have progressed on treatment with Osimertinib.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to learn about the safety, pharmacokinetics (pharmacokinetics helps us understand how the drug is changed and eliminated from your body after you take it), and efficacy (how well a study treatment works in the study) of the study medicine (called nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) for potential treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The study medicine will be given to patients under 18 years of age with COVID-19 that are not hospitalized but are at risk for severe disease.
The aim of this study is to evaluate compliance, acceptability, gastrointestinal tolerance, nutrient intake, appetite, nutritional status, and safety of four new ready to drink ONS. This is a prospective, longitudinal, 28-day intervention study with a 1-day baseline period. During the intervention period, patients will receive one of the four ONS for 28 days alongside their routine diet.