There are about 36633 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in France. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
One of the main challenges of the health crisis caused by the COVID-19 epidemic is the availability of beds in intensive care units (ICUs) and, more importantly, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IVM) because the ICUs are currently reserved for intubated patients. The experiences of both China and Italy indicate that a certain number of COVID-19 patients will require mechanical ventilation. However, the limited number of resuscitation beds and ventilators requires strict use of these scarce resources. As a significant proportion about 5% to 10%, of patients initially admitted to hospital with COVID-19 will require ventilation, it is essential to anticipate their need for resuscitation to improve the rare resource of beds and ventilator shortages in intensive care units. The hypothesis of the study is that, in proven or suspected hospitalised and oxygen-requiring COVID-19 patients, an early predictive clinical score, calculated over the three first days of admission may allow for an earlier identification of patients who will require intubation and transfer to an intensive care unit for orotracheal intubation
To provide optimal care to patients and to maintain long-term institutional viability, Transplant Centres (TC) must have an awareness of their patients' health status, their health care needs and priorities, as well as their access to information and health care. For example, it is critical that TCs understand whether their patients are medically suitable for transplant, whether transplantation remains a priority for their patients, how best to communicate with their patients, and whether their patients have sufficient access to medications and health care to undergo transplant safely. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a tremendous impact on people and institutions around the country in a short period of time. At this time, little is known regarding its impact on the transplant community specifically. For example, it has been reported that around 8 million French applied for partial unemployment benefit over the past month, but it is not known if this has affected transplant patients. It has been reported that people with significant chronic medical conditions and those with compromised immune systems may be at increased risk of dying from the COVID-19, but it is not known if this has affected patients' interest in receiving transplants at this time. The "Société Francophone de Transplantation (SFT)" published recommendations at the beginning of the pandemic in order to limit the rate of infection in these high-risk population. The purpose of this study is to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on patients on the waiting list and transplant patients. Further, a better understand on how patients have received information about this pandemic and how best to communicate with them.
OSCAR (Otilimab in Severe COVID-19 Related Disease) is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of otilimab for the treatment of severe pulmonary COVID-19 related disease. The study is being conducted in 2 parts (Part 1 and Part 2). Otilimab is a human monoclonal anti-granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibody that has not previously been tested in participants with severe pulmonary COVID-19 related disease in Part 1. The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit-risk of a single infusion of otilimab in the treatment of hospitalized participants with severe COVID-19 related pulmonary disease with new onset hypoxia requiring significant oxygen support or requiring early invasive mechanical ventilation (less than or equal to [<=] 48 hours before dosing). Participants will be randomized to receive a single intravenous (IV) infusion of otilimab or placebo, in addition to standard of care.
The new Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently responsible for a pandemic spread of febrile respiratory infections, responsible for a veritable global health crisis. In adults, several evolutionary patterns are observed: i) a/pauci-symptomatic forms; ii) severe forms immediately linked to rare extensive viral pneumonia; and iii) forms of moderate severity, some of which progress to secondary aggravation (Day 7-Day 10). Children can be affected, but are more rarely symptomatic and severe pediatric forms are exceptional. Like some other coronaviruses (SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)), these differences in clinical expression could be based on a variability in the immunological response, notably either via inhibition of the type I interferon (IFN-I) response, or on the contrary an immunological dysregulation responsible for a "cytokine storm" associated with the aggravation. Little is known about the impact of these innate immune response abnormalities on the adaptive response. In addition, certain genetic factors predisposing to a state of "hyper-fragility" and certain viral virulence factors could also be predictive of the clinical response. In this context, the main hypothesis is that the virological analysis and the initial biological and immunological profiles are correlated with the initial clinical presentation of COVID-19 infection. In particular, children forms and pauci-symptomatic disease in adults may be linked to a more robust innate immune response, including better production of IFN-I.
Analysis of localizations for symptoms and ischemia on treadmill and of the recovery profiles of patients that have had an exercise oximetry
To date, the effects of SARS-Cov-2 (Covid-19) on the myocardium and the role it plays in the evolution towards an acute myocarditis are badly understood. The current pandemic of this emerging virus is an opportunity to assess the proportion of acute myocarditis attributable to SARS-Cov-2(Covid-19) and to assess the clinical, biological and imaging presentations, by means of a national prospective multicentre hospital registry of cases of acute myocarditis.
Background: The COVID19 and liver relationships are very rare. The preliminary Chinese data indicate that 2-11% of patients treated for COVID19 had an underlying chronic liver disease. However, there is no clinical data on morbi-mortality in this context. Objectives: Primary Objective: Evaluate the mortality related to Covid-19 in patients with a chronic liver disease Secondary objectives: - Evaluate the mortality (liver-related and no liver-related) due to the Covid-19 according to the cirrhotic status, an history of hepatocellular carcinoma, an immunosuppressive treatment and its type, the etiology-ies of liver disease at the diagnosis of Covid-19 (viral hepatitis -B and/or C-, liver disease related to alcohol consumption, metabolic syndrome, hemochromatosis, immune liver disease, other or unknown), and comorbidities - Evaluate the liver morbidity related to Covid-19, including - incidence of liver biochemical abnormalities in patients with normal liver enzymes values or of a 2-fold increase of usual values for AST, ALT, GGT, Alcalines Phosphatasis - incidence of liver complications (acute hepatitis, liver insufficiency, decompensation of cirrhosis, encephalopathy, renal insufficiency) Patients: All patients with a liver disease (chronic or acute) with a positive diagnosis of Covid-19 assessed either by positive PCR or specific thoracic abnormalities at TDM Methodology: Observational ambispective study consisting exclusively of a collection of data from patients with liver diseases and managed for COVID 19 The data is collected and transcribed on a secure electronic eCRF hosted at the Assitance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris and accessible online from the AFEF website Duration and organisation of the research: After information of the patients and making available a non-opposition form, the main demographic and clinical data related to the liver disease and to the COVID19 already collected in the patient's medical record will be collected in a dedicated e-CRF. Effective of the study: All consecutive patients included in the study whose data are collected e-CRF until 31/12/2020.
The COVID-19 pandemic is profoundly changing the way people live and work. After the health impact, it is the mental and psychological impact that reaches varying degrees in the entire world population. The previous Asian epidemics have had a lasting impact on the health professionals concerned. In France, no study has yet assessed the psychological impact of this health crisis on the level of health professionals. Investigators propose to study prospectively the evolution of the state of stress and anxiety of all the professionals practicing within the gynecology-obstetrics departments of 18 French hospitals. Investigators also hypothesize that the mental repercussions in terms of stress and anxiety within the same service could be different depending on the professional status and the place of exercise (the French regions being impacted in different ways). In addition to the epidemiological interest, the results of this study may help us to target regions and professionals who will need psychological support during and after this serious health crisis.
Acute renal failure is a common complication in patients admitted to intensive care. Due to the increasing incidence of acute renal failure, the use of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) is on the rise in the intensive care unit. The use of CRRT exposes patients to some complications (bleeding, hemodynamic instability, antibiotic underdosing, malnutrition and infections), justifying the importance of optimizing the quality and reliability of this technique. Renal function is classically assessed by diuresis and creatinine. Creatinine clearance is an indirect measure of glomerular filtration rate. Measuring creatinine clearance is a simple, accessible and relatively inexpensive method. Traditionally, clreatinine clearance has required 24-hour urine collection. However, it has been shown that two-hour urine collection is also an accurate tool. There is little information and few recommendations as to when to discontinue CRRT. A predictive index for the withdrawal of CRRT would reduce the duration of treatment, reduce complications and costs, and speed up patient rehabilitation. Various parameters have been described as tools for deciding when to stop dialysis: diuresis before stopping CRRT, urine and blood creatinine, daily urinary urea excretion, and sodium and water balance. Among these factors, urine output and creatinine appear to be promising predictive factors. The measurement of creatinine clearance combines these two factors and can therefore be a good tool for predicting the return of adequate renal function. Retrospective work carried out by Fröhlich et al in 2012 suggested that creatinine clearance measured over 2 hours could be a good marker for successful withdrawal. The hypothesis of the study is that creatinine clearance measured over 2 hours after stopping CRRT is be predictive of the success of the withdrawal from this type of therapy.
Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common condition and a common reason for urgent medical consultation. Assessing the extent of respiratory impairment is important to improve the management of patients with ARF. When Acute respiratory failure is caused by pathology of the pulmonary parenchyma, quantification of pulmonary radiographic involvement may be a component of the initial assessment of severity. This radiographic quantification would only be usable in clinical routine if it can be automated and provide a real-time result. The objective of this work is to assess the feasibility of an automated technique for quantifying radiological lung damage in situations of known or potential ARF.