There are about 4010 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Argentina. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Estimation of the prevalence and contagiousness of undocumented novel coronavirus infections is critical for understanding the overall prevalence and pandemic potential of this disease. It is estimated that 86% of all infections were undocumented [95% credible interval (CI): 82-90%] before the 23 January 2020 travel restrictions. The transmission rate of undocumented infections per person was 55% the transmission rate of documented infections (95% CI: 46-62%), yet, because of their greater numbers, undocumented infections were the source of 79% of the documented cases. Ivermectin + Carrageenan, taking advantage of their virucidal effects, are aimed at reducing the contagion.
This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase 3 study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maternal immunization with RSVpreF against medically attended lower respiratory tract illness (MA-LRTI) in infants.
In this study researchers want to learn more about changes in visual acuity (clarity of vision) with a high dose treatment with Aflibercept (Eylea) in patients suffering from neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Neovascular AMD is an eye disease that causes blurred vision or a blind spot due to abnormal blood vessels that leak fluid or blood into the light sensitive lining inside the eye (retina). The fluid buildup causes the central part of the retina (macula) responsible for sharp, straight-ahead vision to swell and thicken (edema), which distorts vision.
The reason for this study is to see if the study drug baricitinib is effective in hospitalized participants with COVID-19.
This is a Phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 30 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) intravenous (IV) infusions of pamrevlumab administered every 3 weeks as compared to placebo in participants with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). There is a 48-week randomized treatment phase followed by an optional, open-label extension phase.
This study is open to adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who are at least 40 years old. People taking standard medicines for IPF, including antifibrotic medicines, can continue taking them throughout the study. The purpose of the study is to find out whether a medicine called BI 1015550 can slow down the worsening of lung function. Participants are in the study for about 4 months. During this time, they visit the study site about 7 times. At the beginning, they visit the study site every 2 weeks. After 1 month of treatment, they visit the study site every 4 weeks. The participants are put into 2 groups by chance. 1 group gets BI 1015550. The other group gets placebo. Placebo tablets look like BI 1015550 tablets but contain no medicine. The participants take BI 1015550 or placebo tablets twice a day. The participants have lung function tests at study visits. The results of the lung function tests are compared between the BI 1015550 group and the placebo group. The doctors also regularly check the general health of the participants.
Primary Objectives: - Part 1 - To characterize the safety and tolerability of SAR442720 in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with advanced solid tumors. - To define the MTD and RP2D for the combination of SAR442720 and pembrolizumab in participants with solid tumors. - Part 2 - To determine the anti-tumor activity of SAR442720 in combination with pembrolizumab. - Part 3A - To define the MTD and RP2D for the combination of SAR442720 and adagrasib in participants with KRAS G12C NSCLC - To characterize the safety and tolerability of SAR442720 in combination with adagrasib in participants with KRAS G12C NSCLC - Part 3B - To determine the anti-tumor activity of SAR442720 in combination with adagrasib in participants with KRAS G12C NSCLC - Part 4 - To evaluate the impact of food on the PK of SAR442720 when dosed with pembrolizumab. - To evaluate the impact of the formulations (formulation 1 and formulation 2) on the PK of SAR442720 when dosed with pembrolizumab. Secondary Objectives: - Part 1 - To assess the PK of SAR442720 with pembrolizumab, and the PK of pembrolizumab with SAR442720. - To estimate the anti-tumor effects of SAR442720 with pembrolizumab. - Part 2 - To assess the safety profile of SAR442720 combined with pembrolizumab. - To assess other indicators of anti-tumor activity. - To assess the PK of SAR442720 with pembrolizumab, and the PK of pembrolizumab with SAR442720. - Part 3A - To characterize the PK of SAR442720 with adagrasib, and the PK of adagrasib with SAR442720. - To estimate the anti-tumor effects of SAR442720 with adagrasib - Part 3B - To assess the safety profile of SAR442720 with adagrasib in participants with KRAS G12C NSCLC. - To assess other indicators of anti-tumor activity. - To assess the PK of SAR442720 with adagrasib, and the PK of adagrasib with SAR442720. - Part 4 - To assess the safety and tolerability of SAR442720 formulations with pembrolizumab - To estimate the anti-tumor effects of SAR442720 with pembrolizumab.
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of LXH254 combinations in previously treated unresectable or metastatic melanoma
Primary Objective: To determine the efficacy of SAR442168 compared to placebo in delaying disability progression in NRSPMS Secondary Objective: To evaluate efficacy of SAR442168 compared to placebo on clinical endpoints, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions, cognitive performance, physical function, and quality of life To evaluate safety and tolerability of SAR442168 To evaluate population pharmacokinetics (PK) of SAR442168 and relevant metabolites in NRSPMS and its relationship to efficacy and safety To evaluate pharmacodynamics (PD) of SAR442168
The recent inception of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has caused thousands of deaths globally. The most frequently reported complications among COVID-19 patients are from respiratory involvement. Vitamin D has immunomodulatory effects that could protect against COVID-19 infection. Indeed, there is good evidence from randomized clinical trials suggesting that high doses of vitamin D administered during cold seasons prevent viral respiratory infections in at risk individual, and more recently, observational studies suggested that the mortality rate from COVID-19 is inversely correlated with levels of serum 25(OH)vitamin D. The hypothesis of the study is that a high dose of vitamin D given orally to patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 will prevent the occurrence of respiratory deragement and other adverse clinical events. To evaluate the aforementioned hypothesis, a randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial comparing a 500.000 UI dose of vitamin D versus placebo among COVID-19 patients at moderate risk, requiring hospitalization but without requirements of critical care at admission was designed. The intervention will be one dose of 500.000 UI given orally or matching placebo. The trial has a sequential design with two steps: - The first step, projected to include 200 patients, will assess the effects of the intervention on the respiratory SOFA; and - If there is a detectable effects, the second step, projected to include 1264 patients, will assess the effects on a combined event that includes need of high dose of oxygen or mechanical ventilation. All study outcomes will be measured during the index hospitalization.