View clinical trials related to Coronary Restenosis.
Filter by:The primary objective of this study is determine the safety and performance of the Agent™ Paclitaxel-Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter compared to the SeQuent® Please Paclitaxel-Releasing Coronary Balloon Catheter for the treatment of patients with narrowed previously-stented coronary arteries (in-stent restenosis). The performance will be determined at six months post-procedure by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) to measure Late Lumen Loss (LLL) in the re-opened stented segment. QCA results will be assessed by an independent, blinded angiographic core lab. Study statistical hypothesis: The loss of in-stent luminal diameter at six months after treatment of the restenosed stent with the Agent™ study device is not larger than the respective LLL after treatment with the SeQuent® Please control devices, i.e. study device is non-inferior to the control device with respect to LLL.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and clinical outcomes of the Absorb BVS for daily use in patients with de novo lesions in previously untreated vessels.
The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel eluting balloon (SeQuent Please) compared to coronary stenting with the Everolimus-eluting balloon expandable stent (Xience Prime or Xience Xpedition or Xience Alpine) in the treatment of drug eluting stent restenosis.
The registry aims to evaluate the safety, performance and efficacy of the Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) system following rotational atherectomy in patients with complex de novo native coronary artery lesions in all-day clinical practice.
Abbott Vascular (AV) obtained marketing approval for the XIENCE PRIME Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE PRIME EECSS) in China from the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) on August 10th, 2011. This prospective, observational, open-label, multi-center, single-arm, post-approval study is designed to evaluate the continued safety and effectiveness of the XIENCE PRIME EECSS in a cohort of real-world patients receiving the XIENCE PRIME EECSS during commercial use in real-world settings in China. This study has no primary outcome measure. All observations are of equal weight.
This study aims to test the hypothesis that plaque composition differs within a stent between bare metal stents and drug eluting stents (DES). It is possible that a difference in plaque composition seen within a stent may be contributory to the late thrombotic events seen more frequently with DES.
ABSORB FIRST is a prospective, multi-center registry. The objectives of the study are to: - Provide ongoing post-market surveillance for documentation of safety, performance and clinical outcomes of the Absorb BVS (Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold) System in daily PCI practice per Instructions for Use (IFU, on-label use). - To evaluate the safety and performance of 12 mm or shorter Absorb BVS in single or overlapping use (bailout, optimization of long lesion treatment) for the treatment of patients with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesion(s) - Collect additional information (e.g. acute success) to evaluate handling and implantation of Absorb BVS by physicians under a wide range of commercial use conditions and following routine clinical practice.
The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with biodegradable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such biodegradable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, there is no data available from head-to-head comparisons between biodegradable and contemporary third generation durable polymer DES.
To determine in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) whether percutaneous coronary intervention - in patients with in-stent restenosis in either bare metal stents or drug eluting stents - with the Pantera Lux balloon is angiographically non-inferior to percutaneous intervention with the Orsiro stent 6 months post-procedure.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that a BioFreedom™ Drug Coated Stent is non-inferior to a bare metal stent at one year as measured by the composite safety endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and definite/probable stent thrombosis, and that its efficacy is superior to a bare metal stent as measured by clinically driven TLR at one year.