Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
Official title:
Paclitaxel-coated Balloon for the Treatment of De-novo Non-complex Coronary Artery Lesions: an Open-label, Multicentre, Randomised, Non-inferiority Trial
Verified date | March 2024 |
Source | Xijing Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The introduction of Bare-metal stents (BMS) since 1986 has alleviated the limitations of plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) related elastic recoil and flow-limiting dissections. Later on, higher restenosis rates due to exaggerated neointimal growth in BMS has led to the development of drug-eluting stents (DES), which elutes an antiproliferative drug to the vessel wall and reduce the restenosis rate. However, late stent thrombosis and restenosis, with a hazard of nearly 2% per year after implantation, remained a concern and motivated the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB). The advantages of DCB are that leaving no metal in the blood vessel and respect the vessel anatomy. Recently, studies with the strategy of DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting have demonstrated safety and efficacy for the small-vessel disease. In the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial, which compared SeQuent Please DCB with EES or Taxus DES in the vessels that have reference diameter<3mm, showed that at 12-month follow-up, DCB was non-inferior to DES (MACE [cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularisation] rates: 8% vs. 9%). Although some small-scale RCT using surrogate endpoints have reported that no significant difference in MLD or late lumen loss between the two groups in large vessels, up to now, there is no large-scale RCT comparing the clinical outcomes of DCB versus DES in large vessels with de novo lesions. Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that in patients undergoing non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de-novo stenoses, drug-coated balloon (DCB) is non-inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES).
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 2272 |
Est. completion date | May 5, 2027 |
Est. primary completion date | May 5, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with an indication for PCI due to acute or chronic coronary syndrome 2. Patients with de-novo, non-complex lesion* and underwent successful pre-dilation** 3. Patients who are able to complete the follow-up and compliant to the prescribed medication - Non-complex PCI is defined as 1. Vessels treated<3; stents implanted<3; lesions treated<3 or Total stent length<60 mm 2. Bifurcation does not require 2 stents 3. Non left main lesion 4. Non venous or arterial graft lesion 5. Non chronic total occlusion lesion 6. Do not require the use of atherectomy device **Successful pre-dilation is defined as fulfilling all the following criteria 1. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow =3 2. Without dissections type D, E, and F 3. Residual stenoses <30% after balloon pre-dilation (visual). 4. Without serious complication requiring the termination of PCI Exclusion Criteria: 1. Under the age of 18 2. Unable to give informed consent 3. The patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing (a pregnancy test must be performed within 7 days prior to the index procedure in women of child-bearing potential according to local practice) 4. Known contraindication to medications such as Heparin, antiplatelet drugs, or contrast. 5. Currently participating in another trial and not yet at its primary endpoint 6. The concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 2 years 7. Previous intracranial hemorrhage 8. In-stent stenosis requiring revascularization (defined as stenosis=50% by visual or positive functional assessments in any vessel) 9. Atrial fibrillation 10. Prior CABG 11. Cardiogenic shock |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Ling Tao | Xi'an | Shannxi |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Xijing Hospital |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE) | DoCE is a composite clinical endpoint of Cardiac cause death, Target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and Clinically and physiologically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR). | 24 months | |
Secondary | Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE) | Rates of the DoCE beside the time point of primary endpoint | 1, 12, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Cardiac cause death | Rates of individual components of the DoCE | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) | Rates of individual components of the DoCE | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Clinically and physiologically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR) | Rates of individual components of the DoCE | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) | Patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) defined as all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, and any clinically and indicated revascularisation) | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | All-cause death | individual components of PoCE | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Any MI | individual components of PoCE | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Any stroke | individual components of PoCE | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Any revascularisation | individual components of PoCE | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Any clinically and physiologically indicated revascularisation | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | ||
Secondary | Target vessel failure (TVF) | Target vessel failure, defined as cardiovascular death, TV MI and clinically-indicated target vessel revascularisation | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Clinical and physiologically indicated target vessel revascularization | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | ||
Secondary | Net adverse clinical events (NACE) | Net adverse clinical events (NACE), define as POCE or BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding events | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding events | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | ||
Secondary | BARC defined type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding events | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | ||
Secondary | Definite/Probable Stent thrombosis rates | According to ARC-II classification | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
Secondary | Device success | Device success is defined by the following: DCB: 1.Successful delivery within 120 seconds (DCB in vessel) of the DCB device at the intended target lesion; 2.DCB is successfully dilated for at least 30 seconds and the device system is successfully withdrawn; 3.After DCB dilation, the target vessel has no flow limiting dissection (type D, E and F); and the final in-lesion residual stenosis is less than 30% by core laboratory QCA (preferred methodology) or visual assessment; 4.No bailout procedure by stent; DES: 1.1. Successful delivery, balloon expansion, and deployment of the first assigned device, at the intended target lesion; 2.Successful withdrawal of the device delivery system; 3. 3. Attainment of a final in-stent residual stenosis of <20% by core laboratory QCA (preferred methodology) or visual assessment; | 0 day (during index PCI) | |
Secondary | Procedure success during PCI | Device success + without the occurrence of DoCE + no stent thrombosis at discharge during the index procedure hospital stay (maximum of 7 days). | 7 days | |
Secondary | Clinically relevant ischemic or bleeding events | Time from randomization to the occurrence of first any ischemic or bleeding endpoints, including all-cause death, any stroke, MI, BARC-defined type 3 bleeding, any revascularization and BARC-defined type 2 bleeding events | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |