View clinical trials related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Filter by:In this open, monocentric, observational study acute coronary syndrom (ACS) patients will be characterized by pneumological examination concerning a concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Often COPD coexists with ACS; therefore ACS patients benefit either from prevention or potential therapy of chronic hypoxia.
Morbidity and mortality in COPD result largely of acute exacerbations.The optimization of the respiratory management represents a fundamental challenge for improving prognosis and reducing mortality. While the hospital mortality of patients treated with NIV has decreased over years, and is currently less than 10 %, mortality in patients treated with invasive ventilation remains higher than 25%. To improve the prognosis of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD requiring invasive mechanical ventilation is therefore a major challenge in terms of morbidity and mortality. Among the means available to achieve this goal, minimally invasive extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) seems to be a very promising approach. The investigators hypothesize that the addition of minimally invasive ECCO2R is likely to limit dynamic hyperinflation in COPD patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for an acute exacerbation, while improving gas exchange.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the superiority of the fixed triple therapy with BDP/FF/GB at a daily dose of 400/24/50 mcg respectively with that of Ultibro® Breezhaler® (DPI), fixed combination of indacaterol 85 mcg and of glycopyrronium 43 mcg in COPD patients.
Rationale: Inhaled bronchodilators, beta-2-agonist or anticholinergic or combinations, can be delivered by several types of devices: dry powder (DPI), pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI), and wet nebulizers. Wet nebulization is available for short-acting bronchodilators only, is cumbersome, and, importantly, has never been scientifically been proven to be more efficacious than delivery by the other two methods. Yet many patients are happy with wet nebulization and in many clinics this administration method prevails. The investigators believe that combined long-acting bronchodilators, are more efficacious than combined short acting bronchodilators per nebulizers. Objective: To test the hypothesis that: The combination of the two long-acting bronchodilators indacaterol and glycopyrronium by dry powder inhalation confers a superior improvement compared to nebulisation with ipratropium/salbutamol, when administered as single dose in patients with stable state chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Study design: Investigator initiated, randomised, active controlled, cross-over double-blind (and therefore double-dummy), study comparing the effects of single dose indacaterol/glycopyrronium 110/50 Breezhaler® versus single dose ipratropium/salbutamol nebulisation in patients with COPD in stable state Study population: Patients visiting the outpatient clinics or from general practitioner (GP) practices with COPD GOLD stage A-D, and (FEV1) post-bronchodilator FEV1/ forced vital capacity (FVC) < 70%; post-br FEV1 < 80%pred. Intervention The investigators will compare the effects of single dose indacaterol/glycopyrronium 110/50 Breezhaler® versus single dose ipratropium/salbutamol nebulisation in patients with COPD in stable state Main study parameters/endpoints: Area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 6 hours of FEV1 with indacaterol and glycopyrronium, compared to nebulisation with ipratropium/salbutamol Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This study has no specific benefits for the participating patients. The study also has no major risks. Minor risks for participants after a single dosis can be throat irritation, cough, headache and dizziness, sinus tachycardia. The combination of treatments with β2-agonist bronchodilators and anticholinergic bronchodilators have been used in daily practice for many years in many countries and they are often prescribed both in COPD. Both indacaterol/glycopyrronium and ipratropium/salbutamol are approved for COPD treatment in the Netherlands
Advanced Pulmonary Disease (PAD) is a condition that affects countless individuals around the world. Patients are often functionally very limited, with premature death, which is due to the disease itself or its complications. Currently, there are numerous monitoring centers of these patients to increase survival, reduce costs and humanize care in these patients.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of self management programs based on 5A model on the lung function status, dyspnea and exercise tolerance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The control group were receiving standard practice care and the intervention group were receiving intervention in addition to standard practice care. The intervention content include implementation of a self management plan based on 5A model.
The investigators will compare the reduction in Borg dyspnea score during the 3-min constant rate shuttle walking test after 3 weeks of indacaterol 110 µg/Glycopyrronium 50 µg (Ultibro®) versus Tiotropium 18 µg (Spiriva®) alone in patients with moderate to severe COPD.
To demonstrate superiority of QVA149 (110/50 μg) once daily compared to tiotropium 18 μg once daily in terms of trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (mean of 45 min and 15 min pre-dose) following 12 weeks of treatment in mild to moderate symptomatic COPD patients
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Transcription Factor and Cytokine Study.
Minnesota HealthSolutions Corporation (MHS) proposes to develop and evaluate a program to motivate and monitor people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to complete home exercise as part of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). The proposed system has two components: home-based activity monitoring and health coaching. The investigators will conduct a randomized, wait-list controlled clinical study to evaluate the effects of the activity monitoring system and health coaching on quality of life and daily steps.