Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00303511
Other study ID # 0103-2006
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received March 16, 2006
Last updated July 16, 2014
Start date January 1996
Est. completion date August 2006

Study information

Verified date July 2014
Source Emory University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Review the feasibility, safety and outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease who undergo pacemaker implantation for bradycardia, tachycardia or heart failure indications


Description:

Survival to adulthood is now common for children born with congenital heart defects (CHD). This improved survival is in large part due to advances in cardiac surgery over the past 4 decades. However, few cardiac surgical repairs are curative. Many 'repaired' children with congenital heart defects later develop problems as adults. Arrhythmias, need for additional surgery, and heart failure are the more common late sequelae of congenital heart disease (1). In addition, many adults with CHD will need a pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome (inability of the inherent pacemaker of the heart to function properly resulting in bradycardia sometimes alternating with tachycardia), tachyarrhythmias or heart block (2, 3). Certain group of patients, such as those with congenital corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA), d-transposition s/p atrial switch procedures and those with single ventricle physiology are at particular risk of developing heart failure (4). Attached figures show the anatomy of these congenital heart defect. Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves exercise tolerance, symptoms and reduces mortality in adults with heart failure due to acquired left ventricular dysfunction.(5-8). In addition, automatic internal cardioverter - defibrillators (ICD) have now been shown to decrease mortality in patients with low ejection fraction due to ischemic or non-ischemic etiologies (9, 10).

Patients with CHD pose a challenge to traditional transvenous pacemaker lead placement due to either complex venous anatomy that precludes conventional percutaneous approaches for pacemaker implantation or occlusions of central venous form multiple prior procedures (11, 12). As evident in the study by Janousek et.al, 7 out of 8 patients enrolled in this study required a thoracotomy for lead placement (4). While thoracoscopic epicardial lead placement has been described for placement of pacemaker leads in adults without congenital heart defects (13, 14), it has not been described for adult patients with congenital heart disease.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 10
Est. completion date August 2006
Est. primary completion date August 2006
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 19 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Congenital heart disease diagnosis

- Pacemaker implantation completed during the period of Jan. 1, 1996 to Dec. 1, 2005

- Age 18 to 80, inclusive

Exclusion Criteria:

- Those who do not meet inclusion criteria

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Retrospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
United States Emory University SOM Adult Cardiac Clinic Atlanta Georgia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Emory University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Feasibility of Pacemaker Implant With Total Thoracoscopic Approach to Epicardial Pacing Lead The ability to place a pacemaker with capture (have the pacemaker work properly) through totally thoracoscopic approach to epicardial pacing lead without requiring conversion to open procedure 30 days No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03262168 - Supported Exercise Programme for Adults With Congenital Heart Disease N/A