Complex Regional Pain Syndromes Clinical Trial
— VECODONOfficial title:
Impact of Compression Garments on Neuropathic-looking Pain in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) of the Upper Limbs.
The aim is to study another alternative for the treatment of pain in people with CRPS. Indeed, the TRAB / Medullary occupational therapy department of the CMRRF in Kerpape used compression garments to reduce edema when it was present.In the case of CRPS of the upper limbs, gloves or compression sleeves are used to decrease the edema which is sometimes associated, although they are not supported for this indication. In this context, our clinical experience leads us to believe that there would also be some efficacy in neuropathic pain, this improvement being regularly described by patients.This study is expected to show a notable reduction in neuropathic pain thanks to the wearing of a compression garment.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | January 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with CRPS of the upper limb with neuropathic pain - Diagnosis of CRPS according to the Budapest criteria - Diagnosis of neuropathic pain according to DN4 - CRPS evolving for more than 3 months - No phlebitis or open sores on the upper limbs - Patient consent to participate in the study - No modification of his drug treatment for 1 month - Affiliation to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme Exclusion Criteria: - Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice - Psychiatric pathology altering the ability to consent - Severe cognitive disorders that do not allow the patient to assess his pain - Skin pathology preventing the wearing of the compression garment - Patient who has previously worn a compression garment - History of vascular disorders of the upper limbs, lymph node dissection, or any other pathology that can lead to edema regardless of CRPS - Known allergy to one of the components of the compression garments of the Cerecare brand - Declared pregnancy, breastfeeding woman or woman of childbearing potential without contraception - Inability to put on the compression garment alone |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CMRRF de Kerpape | Ploemeur | Bretagne |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonctionnelles de Kerpape | Clinique Mutualiste Lorient, Fondation Rothschild Paris, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The evolution of pain through Visual Analog Scale (VAS), measured every week for 3 months in the last 24 hours and in the last 7 days | The VAS is a self-rated scale. It comes in the form of a 10 cm plastic ruler graduated in mm. On the face presented to the patient is a cursor which he moves along a straight line, one end of which corresponds to "No pain" and the other to "Maximum pain imaginable". The patient should, along this line, position the cursor where the pain is best located. On the other side, there are millimeter graduations seen only by the caregiver. The position of the cursor mobilized by the patient makes it possible to read the intensity of the pain, which is measured in mm. | up to 3 months | |
Secondary | Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | The VAS is a self-rated scale. It comes in the form of a 10 cm plastic ruler graduated in mm. On the face presented to the patient is a cursor which he moves along a straight line, one end of which corresponds to "No pain" and the other to "Maximum pain imaginable". The patient should, along this line, position the cursor where the pain is best located. On the other side, there are millimeter graduations seen only by the caregiver. The position of the cursor mobilized by the patient makes it possible to read the intensity of the pain, which is measured in mm. | At 6 months | |
Secondary | Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | The VAS is a self-rated scale. It comes in the form of a 10 cm plastic ruler graduated in mm. On the face presented to the patient is a cursor which he moves along a straight line, one end of which corresponds to "No pain" and the other to "Maximum pain imaginable". The patient should, along this line, position the cursor where the pain is best located. On the other side, there are millimeter graduations seen only by the caregiver. The position of the cursor mobilized by the patient makes it possible to read the intensity of the pain, which is measured in mm. | At 1 year | |
Secondary | Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) | It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) | It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores | At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) | It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores | At 3 months | |
Secondary | Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) | It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores | At 6 months | |
Secondary | Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) | It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores | At 1 year | |
Secondary | Modification of analgesic drug treatment | The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Modification of analgesic drug treatment | The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient. | At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Modification of analgesic drug treatment | The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient. | At 3 months | |
Secondary | Modification of analgesic drug treatment | The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient. | At 6 months | |
Secondary | Modification of analgesic drug treatment | The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient. | At 1 year | |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion | The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:
Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively. Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score. |
Day 0 | |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion | The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:
Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively. Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score. |
At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion | The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:
Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively. Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score. |
At 3 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion | The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:
Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively. Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score. |
At 6 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion | The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:
Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively. Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score. |
At 1 year | |
Secondary | Measurement of muscle strength in both hands | the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms |
Day 0 | |
Secondary | Measurement of muscle strength in both hands | the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms |
At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of muscle strength in both hands | the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms |
At 3 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of muscle strength in both hands | the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms |
At 6 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of muscle strength in both hands | the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms |
At 1 year | |
Secondary | Measurement of hand circumference | The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.
The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands. |
Day 0 | |
Secondary | Measurement of hand circumference | The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.
The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands. |
At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of hand circumference | The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.
The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands. |
At 3 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of hand circumference | The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.
The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands. |
At 6 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of hand circumference | The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.
The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands. |
At 1 year | |
Secondary | Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA) | Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA) | Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity. | At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA) | Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity. | At 3 months | |
Secondary | Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA) | Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity. | At 6 months | |
Secondary | Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA) | Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity. | At 1 year | |
Secondary | Cartographic assessment of pain | The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Cartographic assessment of pain | The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain. | At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Cartographic assessment of pain | The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain. | At 3 months | |
Secondary | Cartographic assessment of pain | The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain. | At 6 months | |
Secondary | Cartographic assessment of pain | The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain. | At 1 year | |
Secondary | Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire | This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire | This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100. | At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire | This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100. | At 3 months | |
Secondary | Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire | This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100. | At 6 months | |
Secondary | Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire | This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100. | At 1 year | |
Secondary | Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale | It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale | It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression | At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale | It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression | At 3 months | |
Secondary | Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale | It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression | At 6 months | |
Secondary | Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale | It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression | At 1 year | |
Secondary | The Short Form (36) Health Survey | This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health). | Day 0 | |
Secondary | The Short Form (36) Health Survey | This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health). | At 1,5 months | |
Secondary | The Short Form (36) Health Survey | This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health). | At 3 months | |
Secondary | The Short Form (36) Health Survey | This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health). | At 6 months | |
Secondary | The Short Form (36) Health Survey | This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health). | At 1 year | |
Secondary | Observance of wearing the compression garment | Compliance with the wearing of the compression garment will be measured by the average number of hours of wearing the garment per day, which will be evaluated on the patient's statements in the experimental arm during the visits. | Every week for 3 months | |
Secondary | Tolerance of wearing the compression garment | The tolerance of wearing the compression garment will be assessed by recording the presence of irritation or surface skin lesion, compression felt as being too unpleasant or even unbearable by the patient in the experimental arm and leading to stopping wearing. | Every week for 3 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04066933 -
Forms of Cervical Brachial Syndrome Treated With Plasma Concentrate Enriched for A2M
|
||
Completed |
NCT04597866 -
Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, a Long-term Follow-up
|
||
Completed |
NCT04060875 -
Research Protocol for Karuna Labs Inc.: Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Reality Graded Motor Imagery for Chronic Pain
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06453447 -
Prednisone for CRPS in Distal Radius Fracture
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01954888 -
Impact of the Ultrasound-guided Approach on the Efficiency and Safety of the Stellate Ganglion Block in Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00689585 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Ethosuximide for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00377468 -
Effect of Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol on the Prevention of Chronic Pain in Patients With Acute CRPS (ETIC-Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05787119 -
Benefit of Augmented Reality Mirror Therapy in Addition to Conventional Management in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome of the Upper Extremity
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05523934 -
Retrospective Analysis of capsaïcin Patch in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04732325 -
Sensory Testing of Multiple Forms of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03174249 -
Exposure Therapy Combined With Cortical Interventions for CRPS-II
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06033456 -
Combining Stellate Ganglion and T2 and T3 Radiofrequency Ablation on Post-mastectomy Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04144972 -
Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02490436 -
Novel Treatment Option for Neuropathic Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03316066 -
Comparison of Volumes of Local Anesthetics on the Efficiency and Safety of Stellate Ganglion Block for CRPS of the Arm
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05491499 -
Assessing the Impact of Exercise Based Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment (IIPT) on Endogenous Pain Modulation in Youth With Chronic Pain Syndromes
|
||
Completed |
NCT03291197 -
Tolerability of Suprascapular and Median Nerve Blocks for the Treatment of Shoulder-hand Syndrome
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05696587 -
Physical and Psychological Changes in CRPS Patients Undergoing Multimodal Rehabilitation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02957240 -
Graded Motor Imagery for Women at Risk for Developing Type I CRPS Following Closed Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00891397 -
Pregabalin Versus Placebo as an Add on for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CPRS) of the Upper Limb Managed by Stellate Ganglion Block (The PREGA Study)
|
N/A |