View clinical trials related to Communicable Diseases.
Filter by:The goal of this intervention research is to learn about the safety and tolerability of 162 with a single ascending dose in subjects with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
the primary aim of this project is to evaluate the microbiological and inflammatory effect of smoking status and smoking severity on periimplantitis lesions. The secondary aim is to compare the effect of smoking on periimplantitis and periodontal microbiota and inflammation in the same individuals. There will include 96 patients, equally divided into four groups: Smokers with peri-implantitis (n=24), non-smoker individuals with peri-implantitis (n=24), smokers with healthy peri-implant tissues (n=24), non-smoker individuals with healthy peri-implant tissues (n=24). Microbiological and biochemical analyses will be performed on the samples taken.
Detection of the role of Complete Blood Count (CBC) parameters in early diagnosis of pediatric pneumonia -Testing the ability of Complete Blood Count (CBC) parameters (N/L ratio, PLT /MPV ratio, MPV and other parameters) to differentiate between viral and bacterial pneumonia.
The Purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous HRS -8427 in patients with complicated urinary tract infection, including acute pyelonephritis.
This study is designed to evaluate the clinical and antibacterial efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of the drug Fluorothiazinone compared to placebo to prevent nosocomial gram-negative bacterial infections with participation of patients on mechanical ventilation. The main objectives of this study are: - Evaluation of the clinical and antibacterial efficacy of the drug Fluorothiazinone in combination with standard measures for the prevention of nosocomial infections compared to placebo in combination with standard measures for the prevention of nosocomial infections for the prevention of nosocomial infections caused by bacterial gram-negative flora in patients on mechanical ventilation. - Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of the drug Fluorothiazinone in patients on mechanical ventilation. - Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics (in whole blood) of the drug Fluorothiazinone with a single daily dose of 2400 mg/day. Researchers will compare results for the treatment and the placebo arms.
Bone and joint infections (BJI) with and without prosthetic material (knee, hip and shoulder) are complex to diagnose and treat, justifying the creation of expert centers by the French Ministry of Health (CRIOAc). In case of BJI with material, the diagnosis is based on a set of clinical, bacteriological, cytological and radiological criteria known as the EBJIS 2021 (European Bone & Joint Infections Society) criteria. For septic arthritis, diagnosis is based on bacteriology and cytology. Microbiology remains essential, and the delay of obtention of microbiological results is crucial to adapt the antibiotic treatment. Although, culture-based microbiology remains the most common diagnosis of BJI, its regular failure to identify the causative pathogen as well as its long-term modus operandi motivates the development of rapid and accurate molecular methods. The DendrisCHIP®OA platform has demonstrated its ability to offer routine molecular identification of the current micro-organisms involved in BJI, in less than 5 hours, with the detection of mecA resistance genes on series of 16 to 64 samples . The DendrisCHIP®OA is CE-marked and has already been the subject of an initial publication evaluating its performance in a single center. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the DendrisCHIP®OA in detecting the pathogens recognized in its panel and the detection of the mecA gene compared with the routine microbiological techniques used in the inclusion centers participating to the study. The study aims to include 100 patients during 6 months in five inclusion centers in the Ile de France region.
The goal of this clinical study is to test NRX101 in participants with complicated urinary tract infections including pyelonephritis. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does NRX101 help participants resolve UTIs? - Is NRX101 safe for participants with UTIs? Participants will be seen in a doctor's office approximately 6 times to: - Answer a short 10 item questionnaire. - Review of side effects - Urine tests - Blood draw (about 10 ml or 2 teaspoons) - Review of medications - Review any signs or symptoms of UTI - Vital signs and weight (including blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature) - Review of medical history This is an open-label study of NRX101, which means both you and your doctor know what drug you are taking. After the study is completed, researchers will look at the data to see if NRX101 helps participants with complicated UTI's.
Changes in host gene expression may provide additional information to diagnose postoperative infection and improve outcome after surgery. This study aims to validate the early diagnostic performance of specific gene signatures for differentiating infection from non-infected SIRS or uncomplicated postoperative course in blood sampes of adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.
Surgical site infections (SSI) are the most common healthcare-associated infections and sources of morbidity and over-mortality. Factors that have been proven to reduce SSI include antimicrobial prophylaxis, maintenance of perioperative normothermia, avoidance of hyperglycemia, proper surgical techniques, and adequate pain relief postoperatively
As antibiotic resistance increases globally, it becomes more difficult to select empiric antibiotic therapy, particularly in patients with sepsis who stand to benefit from early adequate treatment. In particular it is difficult for clinicians to balance antibiotic stewardship principles (the need to avoid unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics that have an excessively broad spectrum of activity that favour resistance development) and under treatment. The integration of multiple risk variables for resistance are hard for clinicians to translate into clinical action, and is seemingly at odds with the natural inclination to provide heuristic/emotion-based antibiotic selection. The inappropriate treatment of sepsis is not uniformly too broad, or too narrow, and there is a need to optimize and tailor selection of antibiotic therapy to each patient, such that those that are at risk for resistant organisms receive broad therapy, and those that are not at risk, receive narrower antibiotic agents. Clinicians need support picking the right antibiotic for each patient, and from this they can potentially drive reduction of unnecessarily broad antibiotic prescribing while preserving adequacy of treatment. Individualized clinical prediction models and decision support interventions are promising approaches that meet these needs by improving the classification of patient risk for antibiotic resistant or susceptible infections in sepsis. Unfortunately, few have been validated in the clinical setting and larger rigorous studies are needed to provide the evidence to support broader clinical adoption. The investigators will perform a cluster randomized cross-over trial of an individualized antibiotic prescribing decision support intervention for providers treating hospitalized patients with suspected sepsis. The aim of this trial is to determine whether a stewardship led clinical decision support intervention can improve antibiotic de-escalation in patients with sepsis while maintaining or improving adequacy of antibiotic coverage. This decision support intervention will be based on a combination of proven decision heuristics (for Gram-positive organisms) and modelled predicted susceptibilities (for Gram-negative organisms) that are individualized to the patient. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients de-escalated from their initial empiric regimen within 48 hours.