View clinical trials related to Colorectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a commonly used drug for colorectal cancer (CRC). Thermosensitive hydrogel presents a promising carrier for 5-FU to address challenges encountered with traditional administration methods. We propose an integrated approach utilizing colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing to cover the entire colon flexibly, coupled with a thermo-sensitive gel to enhance the adhesion of 5-FU. This clinical trial aims to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this approach for treating CRC.
FEGALA is a comparative, multicenter, randomized, prospective, open-label study comparing the results observed at 3 months (± 15 days) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale in a group of patients with metastatic cancer followed on an outpatient basis and benefiting from the CONTINUUM+ CONNECT solution (with or without nursing support at home) versus comparable patients benefiting from conventional monitoring.
The goal of this observational study is to explore the association of peptidoglycan fragments derived from gut microbiota with colorectal cancer (CRC). The main question it aims to answer is: Are peptidoglycan fragments from the gut microbiota associated with the progression of colorectal cancer? Participants will provide biological specimens (blood, feces, colon tissue obtained during surgery)
This study is a single-center, prospective, single-arm exploratory study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with cetuximab in the treatment of third-line and above RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tislelizumab with Fruquintinib, Metronidazole treatment in MSS/MSI-L advanced colorectal cancer patients with high abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum in a single arm Phase II clinical.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Its early clinical manifestations are often subtle, leading to late-stage diagnosis in about 30% of cases with distant metastases. Liver metastases are widespread and associated with poor prognosis, especially in terms of response to immunotherapy. Despite advancements in first- and second-line treatments, third-line therapies for advanced CRC remain limited, emphasizing the need for novel strategies. This prospective study evaluates the efficacy of combined therapy involving Sintilimab, Fruquintinib/Regorafenib, and radiotherapy in advanced CRC. The study cohort comprises patients with non-liver metastatic advanced CRC and those with liver metastases, each receiving tailored treatment protocols. The primary objectives are to assess progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment response rates. Subgroup analyses will focus on liver metastases to delineate their impact on treatment outcomes. The rationale for this study stems from the intricate interplay between immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy in CRC management. Previous data suggest a negative correlation between liver metastases and immunotherapy efficacy, necessitating a comprehensive approach integrating multiple treatment modalities. Radiotherapy, particularly stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), has shown promise in controlling liver tumors and modulating the tumor microenvironment, potentially enhancing immunotherapy responses. This study aims to provide valuable insights into optimizing third-line and subsequent therapies for advanced CRC by elucidating the efficacy and safety of this combined treatment approach. The findings may pave the way for personalized treatment strategies tailored to individual patient characteristics, ultimately improving clinical outcomes in this challenging disease setting.
The investigators evaluated and optimized the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform based on the use of the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform by colorectal cancer survivors and their families, and finally launched the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform.
Over the last ten years, the discovery of the mechanisms by which tumours escape the control of the immune system, and in particular the T lymphocyte response, has led to the emergence of new therapeutic strategies against cancer, such as the use of "immune checkpoint inhibitors" (ICI). The immune system plays a crucial role in controlling tumour proliferation, and involves several players. Schematically, after recognition of the MHC-peptide complex by the TCR, the T lymphocyte response is modulated by several activating or inhibiting co-stimulatory signals (or "checkpoints"). The balance of these different signals determines whether the T lymphocyte (LT) is activated, resulting in the destruction of the target cell, or whether the T lymphocyte is inhibited (anergy), inducing immune tolerance. By hijacking this system through the expression of inhibitory checkpoints on its surface, the tumour cell is able to evade the effector immune response (1). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against inhibitory co-stimulatory molecules such as Programmed-cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) or their ligand Programmed-cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been developed to restore effective anti-tumour immunity. These ICIs have led to a major improvement in the prognosis of certain cancers, notably melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. However, the efficacy of ICIs varies from one cancer to another. In addition to the expression of PDL1 by the tumour and/or immune cells, and the mutational load, one of the primary factors predicting response to immunotherapy mentioned in several studies is microsatellite instability (MSI).
Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has gained widespread recognition among scholars and has gradually been promoted and popularized around the world. However, the development of NOSES is still in the exploratory stage and there is a lack of strong evidence from evidence-based medicine to support its feasibility and safety, which has greatly affected its clinical application and development. Based on this, at the call of Professor Xishan Wang, the Chinese NOSES Alliance conducted a large retrospective clinical study involving multiple centers. By summarizing the NOSES cases of nearly 100 centers in China, the study aims to clarify the current status of NOSES surgery in China. Additionally, a comprehensive analysis and summary was conducted by combining the basic information of NOSES patients, perioperative data, postoperative pathological data, and follow-up information to further demonstrate the safety and feasibility of NOSES in the treatment of colorectal cancer. This study also provides more real and objective evidence-based medicine support for the promotion and development of NOSES surgery.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of CYBRID Score for predicting in-vivo clinical response based on surgical response or RECIST 1.1 for neoadjuvant and locally advanced/metastatic patients, respectively. The secondary purposes is to determine the sensitivity of the CYBRID Score for predicting in-vivo clinical response based on surgical response or RECIST 1.1 for neoadjuvant and locally advanced/metastatic patients, respectively.