Clinical Trials Logo

Colorectal Neoplasms clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Colorectal Neoplasms.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03841110 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

FT500 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors

Start date: February 15, 2019
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

FT500 is an off-the-shelf, iPSC-derived NK cell product that can bridge innate and adaptive immunity, and has the potential to overcome multiple mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance. The preclinical data provide compelling evidence supporting the clinical investigation of FT500 as monotherapy and in combination with ICI in participants with advanced solid tumors.

NCT ID: NCT03840590 Completed - Clinical trials for Colorectal Neoplasms

Adenoma Detection Rate Using AI System in China

SinoAIADR
Start date: July 10, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim of this study is - to explore the usefulness of Artificial Intelligence system in colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate (ADR). Other aims include to explore the data below when Artificial Intelligence is used. Mean adenomas detected per procedure, MAP Proximal Adenoma detection rate, pADR Polyp detection rate, PDR Proximal polyp detection rate, pPDR Mean polyps detected per procedure, MPP Withdrawal time, WT Cecal intubation rate, CIR Cecal intubation time, CIT

NCT ID: NCT03836131 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Rate of Cancer of Granular Mixed Laterally Spreading Tumors (GM-LST)

LST GM
Start date: December 31, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and the second in women worldwide, with 1.65 million new cases and almost 835,000 deaths in 2015. CRC is still a major cause of mortality associated with cancer, although the wide spread of the screening program has led to a reduction in the mortality rate compared to the last decades. CRCs derive from precancerous lesions that may be polypoid or non-polypoid according to the Paris classification. Thus, resection in an early stage could led to a CRC mortality reduction. Laterally spreading tumors (LST) are non-polypoid lesions of at least 1 cm in diameter that have lateral growth rather than upward or downward growth. The prevalence of LSTs ranges from 1 to 6% of all colorectal lesions. LSTs can be divided into two groups: granular LSTs, which include homogeneous and granular mixed forms and non-granular (NG) LSTs, which include pseudo-depressed and flat-elevated forms. Histologically, 90% of LSTs are adenomas and having a low incidence of invasive neoplasia, these lesions can be removed endoscopically. However, as evidenced by a recent meta-analysis published by Bogie Roel MM et al on Endoscopy, the type of LST and the distal or proximal colonic localization could represent predictors of submucosal invasion and could simplify the therapeutic decision for the removal of these lesions. GM-LSTs and pseudo-depressed NG-LSTs predominantly localize in the distal portion of the colon and have a submucosal invasion rate of 10,5% and 31,6% respectively. LSTs can be removed both through endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The main limitation of EMR is that large lesions require a piecemeal approach, resulting in a non-optimal histological evaluation and a high risk of recurrence. ESD instead allows a higher rate of en bloc resections, thus resulting more curative and reducing the risk of having partial and incomplete resections, which can lead to disease recurrence/non curative resection. LST-GM are characterized by the presence of a granular appearance with a main nodule and represent approximately 1/4 of the LSTs. There are no guidelines indicating the proper resective technique of these lesions. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) suggests to consider ESD for the removal of colorectal lesions that are > 20 mm in size, with a depressed and irregular morphology or a non-granular surface pattern, as these lesions have a high probability of having a limited submucosal invasion. Moreover ESD can be used to treat lesions that cannot be completely removed with standard polypectomy or EMR. The investigators propose to perform a multicenter retrospective observational study to define the percentage of cancer in patients with GM-LSTs treated with endoscopic resection in order to evaluate the correlation between pre-resection and post-resection characteristics, defining the best therapeutic approach (en bloc or piecemeal) and avoiding incomplete endoscopic resections or unnecessary surgical procedures.

NCT ID: NCT03832621 Completed - Clinical trials for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

NIVOLUMAB Plus IPILIMUMAB and TEMOZOLOMIDE in Microsatellite Stable, MGMT Silenced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

MAYA
Start date: March 25, 2019
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is a Phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (NIVO), ipilimumab (IPI) and temozolomide (TMZ) combination in 27 patients with MSS, MGMT-silenced mCRC with initial clinical benefit following lead-in treatment with single-agent TMZ. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to trigger durable antitumor effects in a subset of patients. A high number of tumor mutations (so called 'tumor mutational burden') has recently been found associated with increased immunogenicity (due to a high number of neoantigens) and improved treatment efficacy across several different solid tumors. In mCRCs, only a small fraction of tumors (<5%) display a high mutational load and are usually associated with inactivation of mismatch repair genes such as MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. Checkpoint inhibitors may have increased activity in dMMR/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, a hypothesis which was tested in various Phase II trials with positive results. On the opposite, mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer is unresponsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Previous reports indicate that acquired resistance to TMZ may emerge through the induction of a microsatellite-instability-positive phenotype and recent data showed that inactivation of MMR, driven by acquired resistance to the clinical agent temozolomide, increased mutational load, promoted continuous renewal of neoantigens in human colorectal cancers and triggered immune surveillance in mouse models. On all of the above grounds, the investigators hypothesize that treatment of microsatellite stable MGMT hypermethylated CRCs with alkylating agents could reshape the tumor genetic landscape by increasing the tumor mutational burden, leading to achieve potential sensitization to immunotherapy.

NCT ID: NCT03829852 Completed - Clinical trials for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Regorafenib in Taiwan Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients

Start date: February 11, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Regorafenib is currently the standard of care for refractory mCRC patients. Pivotal studies of regorafenib have proven the efficacy and safety, with a 28-day cycle (21 days on, 7 days off) and 160 mg dose given once daily. In the clinic, patients often have some complicated condition. This study aims to perform retrospective medical chart review of mCRC patients who received regorafenib treatment in two medical centers in Taiwan to examine treatment effectiveness in the routine clinical practice setting.

NCT ID: NCT03829410 Completed - Clinical trials for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Onvansertib in Combination With FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab for Second Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With a Kras Mutation

Start date: May 6, 2019
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the Phase 1b/2 study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Onvansertib, administered orally, daily on Day 1-5 and Day 15-19 of each 28-day cycle, in combination with FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab, as second-line treatment in adult participants who have metastatic colorectal cancer with a Kras mutation. Participants must have histologically confirmed metastatic and unresectable disease, and previously failed treatment or be intolerant to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab.

NCT ID: NCT03823144 Completed - Solid Tumor, Adult Clinical Trials

Intravital Microscopy in Human Solid Tumors

Start date: February 28, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will investigate the tumor-associated vasculature of patients with solid tumors. The investigators will use a technology known as intravital microscopy (IVM) in order to visualize in real-time the vessels associated with solid tumors. The IVM observations may determine if an individual patient's tumor vessels would be amenable to receiving systemic therapy, based on the functionality of the vessels.

NCT ID: NCT03821948 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Blood and Stool Sample Collection in Subjects Participating in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Act Bold

Start date: January 3, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The primary objective of this study is to collect de-identified, clinically-characterized stool and whole blood specimens for use in developing and evaluating the performance of new biomarker assays for detection of colorectal cancer (CRC).

NCT ID: NCT03821545 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

The Anti-inflammatory Effect of Anesthetics in Abdominal Surgery

Start date: January 28, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Clinical studies have shown that IV administration of anesthetics, lidocaine and ketamine with their anti-inflammatory properties, modulates the acute immune response associated with surgical tissue injury, and in this manner they are able to reduce postoperative pain. Lidocaine has anti-inflammatory effects on polymorphonuclear granulocytes, IL-6 and IL-8 cytokines, complement component C3a and IL-1ra in serum. Ketamine produces its anti-inflammatory effects by reducing CRP and IL-6 in serum and by inhibiting NF-kB, which regulates gene transcription responsible for the production of proinflammatory factors. Perioperative combinend IV administration of lidocaine and ketamine could have a more favorable anti-inflammatory effect compared to anesthetic given alone or with placebo. To investigate the effects of lidocaine and ketamine in patients undergoing abdominal surgery on: acute immune response following the level of proinflammatory factors in serum (CRP, IL-6, IL-8); postoperative pain management; recovery of bowel function; administration of opioids; reduction of total treatment costs; length of hospital stay (LOHS) A double-blind, placebo-controlled study will include 100 patients undergoing open colorectal surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: lidocaine, ketamine, lidocaine-ketamine, and placebo. Lidocaine will be administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg prior to surgical incision followed by an infusion at a rate of 1.5-2 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery. Ketamine will be administered at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg in a bolus prior to surgical incision followed by an infusion at a rate of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery. Bolus and continuous placebo infusion (0.9% NaCl) will be equally administered at the same dose as the aforementioned anesthetics until the end of the surgery. Proinflammatory markers in serum (CRP, IL-6, IL-8) will be measured before induction of anesthesia, then 12 hours and 36 hours following the completion of surgery. The intensity of pain will be measured using the VAS score 2 hours and 4 hours following surgery and every 12 hours the following days. The investigators will measure also the consumption of opioids during and after surgery, the length of stay in the ICU, where pain control and analgesics use will be measured, as well as recovery of bowel function.

NCT ID: NCT03819920 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Does Knowing One's Estimated Colorectal Cancer Risk Influence Screening Behavior?

Start date: October 6, 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is designed to examine the impact of telephone-based colorectal cancer risk assessment on colorectal screening attitudes and behavior among previously unscreened adults ages 50 to 75.