SGM-101 Tumor Targeted Fluorescence Endoscopy in Rectal Polyps With Suspected T1 Adenocarcinoma or High Grade Dysplasia

Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial

— SGM-T1  

Official title:

SGM-101 Tumor-targeted Fluorescence Endoscopy to Enable Discrimination of Malignant From Benign Tissue in Rectal Polyps With Suspected T1 Adenocarcinoma or High Grade Dysplasia: a Feasibility Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06280690
• Other study ID #: NL83765.058.23
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: January 31, 2024
• Est. completion date: July 30, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: February 2024
• Source: Leiden University Medical Center
• Contact: Mats Warmerdam, Msc
• Phone: +31715298420
• Email: m.i.warmerdam[@]lumc.nl
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This will be the first trial investigating whether tumor targeted fluorescence is able to discriminate invasive T1 carcinoma / High grade dysplasia from Low grade dysplasia/normal tissue during endoscopic intraluminal resection. This will be done using the CEA-targeted fluorescent probe SGM-101.

Description:

Selection of patients with early rectal cancer, T1 rectal cancer (T1RC) or high-grade dysplasia (HGD), for local resection is based on endoscopic imaging, endorectal ultrasound and/or MRI. However, all these imaging modalities have their limitations in the accurate detection of small areas of cancer in large rectal polyps. Fluorescent guided endoscopy may offer the opportunity to aid in detecting these small cancerous areas in colorectal polyps. Detection of T1RC or HGD in large rectal polyps is essential to select patients for the appropriate (endoscopic) resection technique. Completely benign polyps, solely containing low-grade dysplasia (LGD), could be resected by piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR), a fast technique on which almost all endoscopists are trained. However, for rectal polyps with T1RC or HGD, curative resection must be achieved by en-bloc resection techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID). These techniques are more complex and expensive and only a small number of endoscopists are trained on these techniques. pEMR of lesions with HGD or T1RC must be avoided because they may result in irradical resections (R1) or in inconclusive histological margin assessment since the polyp is not resected en-bloc. Often, this leads to unnecessary additional abdominal surgical resections. Furthermore reported sensitivities for optical diagnosis of T1RC in a polyp are low, varying from 20.8% to 77.8%. Because of the limited accuracy of optical diagnosis, the current Dutch guideline suggest that rectal polyps >3cm should be resected in an en-bloc manner, although it has been demonstrated that only 10.2% of rectal polyps >3cm contain a malignant component. Similarly, in recent studies it was shown that 10-15% of entirely benign polyps were removed by abdominal surgery rather than endoscopically. This has major implications for the patient since surgical resection is associated with considerable morbidity. Therefore, there is a need of a technique that provide the endoscopist with real-time information about specific molecular features of the tumor to differentiate between benign polyps with LGD amenable for pEMR and those that contain HGD or T1RC that require en-bloc resection. Tumor targeted fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) has emerged as a technique with the potential to enable real-time lesion visualization based on specific molecular features rather than on morphology. Recently it was shown that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is overexpressed in approximately 75% of T1RC/HGD. Additionally, expression in LGD was (nearly) absent in 66% of low-grade dysplastic tissue and in 98% of normal rectum tissue, making it a suitable marker for distinguishing T1RC and HGD from LGD and normal tissue. CEA can be targeted by SGM-101, an anti-CEA antibody attached to a fluorophore which has been studied in several clinical studies for patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the use of SGM-101 during endoscopy aids the endoscopist in discriminating benign polyps with solely LGD from polyps containing T1RC/HGD.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 20
• Est. completion date: July 30, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: April 30, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patient must have suspected T1RC/HGD and scheduled for a local endoscopic en-bloc resection. The rectum is defined as the area between the linea dentata and 10cm ab ano.

2. Age > 18 years old

3. Patients should be capable and willing to give signed informed consent before study specific procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prior participation in this study

2. Previous administration of SGM-101

3. Patients with a history of anaphylactic shock

4. Patients pregnant or breastfeeding, lack of effective contraception in male or female patients with reproductive potential

5. Any condition that the investigator considers to be potentially jeopardizing the patients' well-being or the study objectives.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Adenocarcinoma
• Colorectal Cancer
• Image

Intervention

Drug:
• SGM-101
SGM-101 is cea-targeted fluorescent dye

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Netherlands	Leiden University Medical Center	Leiden

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Leiden University Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The ex-vivo NIR-fluorescence tumour to dysplasia ratio (TDR, T1RC/HGD to LGD ratio) on bread loafs (macroscopic) and pathology slides (microscopic).	The ex-vivo NIR-fluorescence tumour to dysplasia ratio (TDR, T1RC/HGD to LGD ratio) on bread loafs (macroscopic) and pathology slides (microscopic).	1.5 years
Secondary	- Ex-vivo NIR-fluorescence tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) and dysplasia-to-background ratio (DBR) (ex-vivo TDR already encountered within main objective)		1.5 years
Secondary	- In-vivo TDR, TBR and DBR, as measured with the Quest spectrum laparoscope.		1.5 years
Secondary	- The accuracy of SGM-101 to discriminate T1RC/HGD from LGD ex-vivo		1.5 years
Secondary	-The accuracy of SGM-101 to discriminate T1RC/HGD from LGD in-vivo		1.5 years
Secondary	- The correlation between in-vivo TBR/TDR and Kudo level (SM1 vs SM2/3)		1.5 years
Secondary	- The agreement of resection margins status (R0 vs R1) assessed by fluorescence and histopathology. A resection margin is classified positive when there is a fluorescent hotspot visible in the wound bed or on the specimen.		1.5 years