View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:At present, chemotherapy is widely used in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer patients after surgery. Capecitabine is one of the main chemotherapeutic drugs. But the effect is not good enough, the adverse reaction is serious, and the individual differences were significant. The present study shows that these problems are related to the differences in the exposure of capecitabine and its metabolites in different patients. The genetic biomarkers for capecitabine include DRD, MTHFR and TYMS. Mutations in these genes directly affect the expression of metabolic enzymes involved in capecitabine and control the concentration of capecitabine and its metabolites. However, these markers have been obtained through clinical trials in the United States, and their role in predicting the effectiveness or safety of capecitabine and its metabolites has not been validated in Chinese cancer patients.The study was based on a case study of patients with colorectal cancer in China, and capecitabine as the primary postoperative chemotherapy regimen to verify whether the available biomarkers can be used to predict the effectiveness and safety of capecitabine. To clarify the effect of capecitabine on endogenous metabolites, and to study the mechanism of its effect, so as to discover new biomarkers.
Patient's anxiety prior to surgery has been linked to more harmful outcome after surgery. The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of video information on preoperative anxiety level in patients with colorectal cancer.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of death in Sweden. There are approximately 6000 new cases each year in Sweden and the disease specific mortality is more than 40%. There risk is about 1% to develop CRC between 60-70 years of age making 60-year olds a suitable target population for colorectal cancer screening. The Swedish ministry of health and social affairs proposed a national study on the efficiency of colorectal cancer screening in the Swedish population regarding mortality, but also what screening method to be used. Eighteen participating counties of Sweden now fund the study to be launched in 2014. From the Register of the total population individuals 59-62 years of age will be randomized and invited by mail to screening. Thirty- thousand five hundred individuals will be invited to primary colonoscopy and 60 000 individuals will be invited to high sensitive FIT (approximately 10% positive) and if positive to a subsequent follow-up colonoscopy. If test negative a second round of FIT will be asked for in two years. In total 183 000 randomized individuals will not be invited to screening, but followed in the Swedish Cancer register and serve as controls. The inclusion period I set to five years (five years with the second round of FIT) generating approximately 5 000 colonoscopies yearly the first three years and 1200 year four and five at a compliance rate of 35% in the colonoscopy arm and 50% in the FIT arm. Follow-up time is set to 15 years with the primary endpoint disease specific mortality, but also incidence. Secondary outcomes by others to be studied are in short quality assurance variables of colonoscopy, participants and non-participants experiences of the invitation and the screening procedure, health economy measures of the CRC-screening study and when implemented in clinical care.
It is uncertain, whether hilar lymphadenectomy should be performed routinely in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. For this reason it is the aim of the present prospective randomized trial to evaluate, if routine lymphadenectomy reduces recurrent disease in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases.