Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05189912
Other study ID # Polyp bag frag
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 17, 2022
Est. completion date August 14, 2022

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

It is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a larger diameter (>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive polyps by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. But it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received by this method, many polyps were fragmented. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal. By removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port, the polyp fragmentation rate was reduced greatly. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and colon insertions, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.


Description:

After polyp resection, it is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a small diameter (≤5mm), usually by pressing the suction valve button of the colonoscope, polyps could be completely retrieved through a trap. For polyps with a larger diameter (>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive resected polyps with larger diameters by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. However, it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received, many polyps were fragmented, and the polyp fragmentation rate can be as high as 36.6%~ 60.3%. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal. Due to the possibility of malignant transformation in some polyps, the completeness of polyp resection is essential to guide the following treatment. Some effective methods were developed to reduce polyp fragmentation, including removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port. The resulting polyp fragmentation rates are 22.4-43.0% and 18.5%, respectively. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and improving the efficiency of the operation, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. In a previous pilot study, the polyp receiving bag has been applied in clinical practice, and its polyp fragmentation rate and polyp recovery failure rate are quite low. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the Polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 204
Est. completion date August 14, 2022
Est. primary completion date July 30, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Single polyp, with a diameter of 5-15mm, 2. Written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Polyps that were not removed en bloc, 2. Underlying bleeding disorder, 3. The platelet count less than 50×10^9/L, 4. Serious cardio-pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease, 5. Intolerance to endoscopy, 6. Other high-risk conditions or disease (such as massive ascites, etc.), 7. Pregnancy.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Specimen retrieving bag
Specimen retrieving bag was used to retrieve resected polyps.
Behavioral:
Sucking polyps to the instrument channel port
Remove the colonoscope suction valve and connect a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.

Locations

Country Name City State
China The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hosptial Beijing Beijing

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Polyp fragmentation rate The proportion of fragmented polyps to all polyps. 1 day
Secondary Retrieving failure rate The proportion of polyps that failed to be retrieved to all polyps removed. 1 day
Secondary The duration time of polyp resection The duration time of polyp resection to the colonoscopy withdraw from body. 1day
Secondary The insertion times of colonoscopy The insertion times of colonoscopy during the operation. 1 day
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03272945 - Linked-color Imaging for the Detection of Colorectal Flat Lesions N/A
Recruiting NCT06062095 - Computer Aided Diagnosis (CADx) for Colorectal Polyps Resect-and-Discard Strategy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02688699 - Additive Hemostatic Efficacy of EndoClot After EMR or ESD in the Gastrointestinal Tract Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT03962868 - Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) for Large Non Pedunculated Colonic Adenomas: a Randomized Comparative Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05776381 - The Impact of a Patient Decision Aid on Treatment Choices for Patients With an Unexpected Malignant Colorectal Polyp Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04157803 - Accuracy of aCETIC Acid to Predict Histopathology of Colonic Polyps N/A
Completed NCT03758872 - CUFF-assisted Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy
Recruiting NCT05870332 - Nationwide Study of Artificial Intelligence in Adenoma Detection for Colonoscopy
Completed NCT03690297 - Linked Color Imaging (LCI) for Colorectal Adenoma Detection N/A
Recruiting NCT04149184 - Computer-aided Detection Device in Standard Colonoscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT03865537 - Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05099432 - The CARMA Technique Study N/A
Withdrawn NCT04778566 - Evaluating the Cologuard Test for Use in Lynch Syndrome
Withdrawn NCT01372696 - Endoscopic Characteristics of Colonic Tumours N/A
Recruiting NCT05322993 - Improving Polyp Detection Rate by Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT03121495 - Study on Second Forward View Examination in the Right Colon N/A
Completed NCT03344055 - Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate N/A
Recruiting NCT06063720 - Effective Withdrawal Time and Adenoma Detection Rate
Completed NCT06426745 - Split-dose Versus Single-dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT04220905 - Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps: An Observational Cohort Study