View clinical trials related to Colo-rectal Cancer.
Filter by:In this exploratory phase II trial, the possibility of a personalized treatment after resistance to cetuximab will be evaluated. Therefore, tumor material of all patients shall be obtained, transferred into avatars and treated the same way as in the patient until resistance arises. These resistant tumor cells are subsequently treated by different targeted treatment combinations in the mouse avatar model to find the most active drug or combination of drugs. This drug or combination of drugs may then be offered to the patient after cetuximab resistance has occurred. Multiple liquid biopsies shall be obtained in patients during first‐line treatment with cetuximab as well as during second line experimental treatment to monitor mutations that may be associated with cetuximab resistance. Furthermore at the time of resistance a biopsy should be taken and analyzed to ensure that the mechanism of resistance seen in the avatar model matches with the mechanism of resistance in the individual patient.
Colo rectal cancer is one of the greatest ,mutual malignancies worldwide ,accounting for an estimated 1.3 million new cases and >500,000 mortality ⁄ year . is the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide with speedily ,cumulative ,occurrence rate in the worldwide
A randomised back to back study comparing cap and Endocuff to detect adenomas during colonoscopy
This study will randomly assign 220 men and women to either a social media intervention or a standard reminder system to have a repeat screening test for colo-rectal cancer.
A Phase I, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-Escalation, Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Minnelide™Capsules given daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off schedule in patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
This study is single center single arm prospective phase II study. In this study, efficacy and side effects of pemetrexed as salvage regimen on patients who failed all standard chemotherapy and total of 29 patients will be enrolled. Pemetrexed will be continued until disease progression is happened.
The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a home-based walking and strengthening intervention on physiological, biochemical and psychological outcomes in colo-rectal cancer survivors. The intervention consists of a 12-week home-based walking and strengthening programme for colo-rectal cancer survivors post any anti-cancer treatment. It aims to gradually increase participants physical activity levels so that they start achieving the recommended levels of at least 150 minutes moderate intensity aerobic activity per week and strengthening exercise for all major muscle groups at least twice per week. As well as usual care, the intervention group will receive weekly telephone calls and a behaviour change interview at baseline. Participants will be recruited from the Cancer Centre at the Belfast City Hospital. Assessments will be taken at baseline (0 weeks), post intervention (12 weeks) and also at a 3-month follow-up (24 weeks). The control group will receive the same assessments at the same time-points however they will continue to receive usual care with the intervention information (including pedometer, exercise booklet, diary and behavioural change interview) being given at the 3-month follow-up appointment.
The purpose of this study is the validation of MMS test to detect active tumor growth in different cancer types before and after therapy, as well as in the course of therapy and for subsequent relapse control compared to standard methods (clinical examination, imaging, tumor markers). It should be consider whether the MMS test has comparable diagnostic accuracy, and thus can replace more expensive or invasive procedures in future.
Knowledge gap: Does the choice of anaesthetic affect outcome for cancer surgery? Aim: To retrospectively examine possible associations (Cox Multiple Regression) between survival from breast-, colorectal-, or skin cancer and the choice of hypnotic used during surgery, ahead of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Hypotheses: One- and five-year survival will be significantly higher after radical breast-, colorectal-, or skin cancer surgery in patients given the intravenously administered hypnotic propofol than in patients given the inhalational hypnotic sevoflurane. Method: To merge two registers, of which one holds demographic- anaesthetic-, and surgical data from 6 303 patients operated on at the three mentioned anatomical locations at the Central Hospital in Vasteras, Sweden during a twelve year period (1998-2009). Of these minimum 4 500 operations would be due to cancer. This register is unique, in that it contains both types of anaesthesia. The other register holds survival data (date and cause of death), stored at the Regional Oncologic Center in Uppsala. The choice of anaesthetic will be validated by controlling each patient's anaesthetic paper file, concomitantly with extraction of details from anaesthesia and surgery, such as the functional classification of each patient (according to American Association of Anesthesiologists), co-morbidity, duration of anaesthesia and surgery, amount of blood loss and possible transfusion. Current knowledge: Different anaesthetics have opposite effects on the immune system and on the DNA. There is a well-established association between the state of the immune system and cancer growth, which in turn will influence survival. There is also an association between DNA damage and cancer development. Inhalational anaesthetics, e.g. sevoflurane, act pro-inflammatory, and they are also proven to be genotoxic. Propofol is anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative, and it is not genotoxic. Objective: Strengthen the hypotheses, and get statistics for a proper power calculation in advance of a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Impact: General anaesthesia is an indispensable part of radical cancer surgery. Undesired effects from anaesthesia on survival has strong relevance for the over all cancer treatment.
Survival of colo-rectal cancer patients after liver transplantation.