View clinical trials related to Colitis, Ulcerative.
Filter by:The primary objective of the study was to compare the percentage of subjects in remission after 8 weeks of treatment with SPD476, 2.4 g/day once daily vs placebo and SPD476 4.8 g/day once daily versus placebo
Evaluate the percentage of subjects in remission at the end of an 8-week treatment period for three dose groups (SPD476 1.2 g/day, 2.4 g/day or 4.8 g/day, administered once daily).
PHASE: IV TYPE OF STUDY: With direct benefit. DESCRIPTIVE: Multicenter, randomized, open label study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of cyclosporine with infliximab in steroid- refractory attacks of ulcerative colitis. STUDY TREATMENTS:Cyclosporine 2mg/kg/day intravenous(IV)for 7days then Neoral 4mg/kg/day orally for 3 months. Infliximab 5mg/kg at Weeks 0, 2 and 6. NUMBER OF PATIENTS: 50 patients in each group i.e. a total of 100 patients. INCLUSION PERIOD: 24 months. STUDY DURATION: 27 months. MAIN EVALUATION CRITERIA: Clinical response at D7 according to the Lichtiger Index score AND Clinical Remission at D98 according to the Mayo Disease Activity Index score SECONDARY EVALUATION CRITERIA: Clinical remission at D98 (according to the Mayo Disease Activity Index score) Endoscopic response Colectomy rate Tolerance
Part 1 of this study is a 3-arm, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, 16-week study to compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX), as monotherapy or in combination with azathioprine (AZA) versus AZA monotherapy in adults with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). Participants who qualify at the Baseline Visit will be eligible to be randomized to one of the three active treatment groups. Participants in the IFX/AZA combination therapy and IFX monotherapy cohorts will receive IFX infusions at Weeks 0, 2, and 6 and daily oral AZA/placebo, respectively; participants in the AZA cohort will receive daily oral AZA and placebo infusions at Weeks 0, 2, and 6. At Week 8, all participants will be evaluated for response. Participants responding to IFX treatment at Week 8, either as monotherapy or in combination with AZA, will receive one more IFX infusion at Week 14; non-responders to IFX therapy will receive placebo infusions at Weeks 8 and 10 and one additional IFX infusion at Week 14. Participants responding to AZA monotherapy at Week 8 will continue on AZA therapy and receive one placebo infusion at Week 14; nonresponders to AZA will be eligible to receive IFX at Weeks 8, 10, and 14. Part 2: Participants in remission on IFX monotherapy or IFX/AZA treatment at Week 16 will be randomized to either maintenance or intermittent open-label IFX treatment; randomization will be stratified based on oral AZA/placebo treatment in Part 1. Oral AZA/placebo treatment will continue to be double-blinded. All participants will continue to receive oral AZA/ placebo for the duration of the study. Participants randomized to maintenance IFX treatment will receive scheduled IFX infusions every 8 weeks beginning at Week 22 (Week 6 for direct entry). If participants lose response, or if treatment has to be discontinued because of an adverse event, these participants are considered treatment failures, and should be followed up for safety at the scheduled 6-month visits (Weeks 38, 62, and 94 [Weeks 22, 46, and 78 for direct entry]). These participants will receive standard of care per their personal physician. Participants randomized to intermittent IFX treatment will be evaluated every 8 weeks. Participants will receive IFX only upon relapse of disease. Treatment with IFX will be initiated at Weeks 0, 2, and 6 of the individual treatment cycle and will continue every 8 weeks until remission is regained. Throughout the study, individual treatment cycles will be repeated whenever a subject relapses. In addition, to facilitate enrollment into Part 2, participants who received treatment outside of Part 1 and who are in remission on IFX with or without AZA/6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) will be allowed to enter directly into Part 2. In the Czech Republic, direct entry into Part 2 of the study is not allowed. A higher than expected incidence of serious infusion reactions observed in the intermittent treatment arm of another study (Protocol P04563, NCT0358670) conducted in participants with moderate to severe psoriasis resulted in the termination of that study. Based on the similarities in study design between the intermittent treatment arm of P04563 and the intermittent treatment arm of Part 2 of this study, enrollment to Part 2 of this study was put on hold, for precautionary reasons. At the same time, all participants already enrolled in the intermittent treatment arm of Part 2 were asked to discontinue from the trial. In October 2009, a decision was made by the sponsor to terminate the whole study (Part 1 and 2). At that time, participants enrolled in Part 1 of the study were allowed to complete their treatment up to Week 16.
Anal sphincter preserving operations are now commonplace for both cancer and non-cancerous rectal diseases. However, this has not always been the case and this development has been facilitated by the invention of circular stapling instruments, which allow the bowel to be reconnected to the anal sphincters, where it would almost be impossible to do so manually. Nevertheless, some patients still require a permanent ostomy, as even with stapling devices ultra low joins of the bowel and sphincter muscles cannot always be performed by a conventional surgery. Therefore, a variety of alternative techniques have been proposed to avoid a permanent ostomy, but these have not become widespread due to the technical difficulty in performing them, their failure to completely eradicate rectal disease, and the damage they inflict upon the anal sphincters resulting in poor bowel function after surgery. The ideal ultra low sphincter preserving operation should remove the rectal disease entirely, allow the small or large bowel to be safely joined to the anal sphincters under direct vision, and retain the sphincter mechanism in its entirety. We propose such a technique that we term the APPEAR procedure, which approaches the lower third of the rectum via an incision between the scrotum or vagina, and the anal sphincters. This procedure preserves sphincter integrity, and allows either a stapled or manual join of the bowel to the sphincter mechanism, under direct vision. This trial is being conducted as a pilot study, with the procedure only offered to patients for whom a conventional sphincter saving procedure was technically impossible, or contraindicated.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping prior to thiopurine use is cost-effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in need of immune suppression. The study is designed to test the hypothesis that optimization of initial thiopurine dose based on pre-treatment TPMT genotyping will maximize treatment efficacy and minimize adverse drug reactions (ADRs) resulting in reduced costs.
The study includes individuals with ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and healthy controls. The purpose of this study is to examine the innate immune system (IIS) by exposing peripheral blood monocytes to various ligands relevant for stimulation of the IIS and study the immune response. Colonic mucosal samples are examined to find gene expression patterns which may distinguish the two forms of disease from each other and from healthy controls. The hypothesis is that the innate immune system has responses unique for the disease states, and that the diseases may be differentiated by examination of gene expression patterns in mucosal biopsies.
All of us have millions of bacteria living in our gut. These bacteria are very important to our health providing us with protection against infections of the gut, allowing us to gain extra nutritional value from food we eat and helping our immune system. Changes in the balance of these many bacteria can make us vulnerable to infections both from within and from outside the gut. Certain bacteria may also be directly associated with some diseases of the gut. Research by doctors and scientists into relationships between the bacteria normally found in our gut and certain diseases of the gut is helping to develop food supplements and other therapies to treat these diseases. This study involves research into the usefulness and safety of two probiotic products in maintaining remission in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Approximately 360 patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis from Ireland, Finland and Spain will be involved in the study. The yoghurts used in this study contain either Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius or Bifidobacterium infantis.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy in maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis between a once daily (QD) Asacol regimen and a divided, twice daily (BID) Asacol dosing regimen.
The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of SPD476 2.4 g/day given twice daily ([BID] ie 1.2 g/day BID) and SPD476 4.8g/day given QD compared to placebo in subjects with acute, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.