Clinical Performance Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Cervical Restorations Performance Using Modified Universal Adhesive Compared to Conventional Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Class V restorations are evaluated to reveal whether the use of modified universal adhesive will have a similar performance compared to conventional universal adhesive or not.
The innovative Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive offers all the benefits of its predecessor, Single Bond Universal Adhesive as demonstrated by a 3M field evaluation comparing the performance of the two products. These benefits include: - Compatibility with all etching techniques - total-etch, self-etch, and selective enamel etch. - Usage with direct and indirect indications. - Bonding to all dental surfaces without the need for separate primers or silanes - Virtually no post-operative sensitivity. The newly modified adhesive with its careful formulation offers: - Radiopacity like dentin to reduce the risk of X-ray misdiagnosis and overtreatment. - Ability to bond and seal caries-affected dentin to support minimally invasive preparation guidelines and maximize preservation of natural tooth structure. - Adhesion to all dental substrates and all direct and indirect materials, including glass ceramics. - Full dual- and self-cure compatibility without the need for an additional dual-cure activator bottle. - A BPA derivative-free formulation to alleviate concerns about BPA in dental materials - A fully aligned system with RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement, offering excellent bond strength for virtually all dual-cure resin cement indications. As with any new material or technique, long-term clinical evaluations are needed to demonstrate the value of universal bonding agents adequately. So, the aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the modified universal adhesive, versus the conventional universal adhesive, for restoring carious class V cavities over one year and a half. ;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT03599232 -
Impact of Formative OSCE on Students' Summative Clinical Performance
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT05928533 -
Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06092697 -
Evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Milled PEEK Indirect Restorations Compared to Hybird Resin Composite Indirect Restorations Over One Year Period of Time ( A Randomized Clinical Trial )
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT03697005 -
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Pressed BioHPP Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)-Based Versus Zirconia-Based Single Crowns
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03375073 -
Positive Communication and Clinical Performance in Anaesthetic Care.
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT01992120 -
Utility of High-Fidelity Simulation In the Education and Assessment of Residents in the Recognition and Management of the Sepsis Syndrome
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04284527 -
The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice Validation as a Measure in Physiotherapy Student
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT04396080 -
Prospective Clinical Trial of Onlay-carrying Patients
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT05945758 -
Esthetic and Clinical Assessment of Injectable Resin Composite Technique
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05334901 -
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT05808075 -
Clinical Performance of Nano Fiber Reinforced Versus Conventional Nano Hybrid Composite in Restoring Premolars
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05337358 -
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).
|
N/A |