Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with plates or intramedullary flexible nails fixation.

Clinical Trial Description

Midshaft clavicular fractures are classically treated with non-surgical methods, supported by many authors as an effective treatment. However, different researches have shown high rates of nonunion and clavicle malunion related to the nonoperative treatment. Currently, indications for surgical treatment are wider and include mainly the following: shortening greater than or equal to 2.0 cm, multiple trauma, open fractures or with imminent exposure and associated neurovascular injury.

Plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures is widely described in the literature, and is considered the gold standard by different authors, associated with a high union rate and a low complication rate. Different types of plates have been used, including reconstruction plates, dynamic compression plates (DCP), low-contact dynamic compression plates (LC-DCP), semi-tubular plates, and pre-molded locking plates. Possible complications are postoperative infection, hardware loosening or failure, peri-incision paresthesia, neurovascular iatrogenic lesions, nonunion, and hardware related symptoms.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) technique has been used in recent years in the treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures. Different studies report excellent functional results and low complication rates. Some theoretical advantages in relation to plates are the 3-point flexible nail support, which provides superior biomechanics resistance and uses the relative stability principle, favoring callus formation. When compared to plain steel wires, titanium nails have lower migration risk, due to its greater flexibility and better bone fixation.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with reconstruction plates or ESIN. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01410032
Study type	Interventional
Source	University of Sao Paulo
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 2
Start date	July 2010
Completion date	April 2014

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT03094481` - Interscalene vs. Superficial Cervical Block vs. Combination for Analgesia After Clavicle Fracture	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04161534` - KT Tape for Pediatric Clavicle Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT06050473` - Supraclavicular Nerve During Clavicle ORIF	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05579873` - Double Plating Versus Single Plating Techniques in Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05262998` - Intramedullary Screw Versus Plate in Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT02769117` - Bone Ultrasound to Access Fracture Healing	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT04986553` - A Multi-Center, Prospective Registry to Evaluate the Continued Safety and Performance of Clavicle Plates
Recruiting	`NCT05810129` - Crossed Education in Relation to Muscle Mass in Patients Operated of Clavicular Fracture	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05327959` - A.L.P.S. Clavicle Plating System PMCF	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05867355` - Surgically Treated Displaced Mid-diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures
Completed	`NCT00872105` - Conservative Treatment Versus Operative Plate Fixation for Acute, Displaced Fractures of the Distal Clavicle	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT00849771` - Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Scapula Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT05268874` - The Effectiveness of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block for Clavicle Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04250415` - Multi-Center Adolescent Clavicle Fracture Trial: Operative vs. Non-Operative Treatment
Withdrawn	`NCT01133769` - Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatment of Clavicle Fracture in PolyTrauma	N/A
Completed	`NCT06269562` - SPSIPB and CPB on Clavicle Surgeries	N/A
Completed	`NCT01405703` - Percutaneous Versus Open Plate Fixation of Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures	N/A
Suspended	`NCT05454306` - Anser Clavicle Pin for Surgical Management of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT03402269` - Treatment of Pediatric Mid-shaft Clavicle Fractures: A Prospective, Observational Study
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04622137` - Kinesiotaping Therapy for Clavicular Fractures FRACTURES:	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Midshaft Clavicular Fractures

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms