Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05302076
Other study ID # UDDS-Ortho-05-2022
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 23, 2019
Est. completion date December 5, 2021

Study information

Verified date March 2022
Source Damascus University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Thirty two patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars and en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: electrical group and control group. In each group, en-masse retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side, Mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit. The overall retraction duration will be calculated. The skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes will be detected using panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs which will be obtained pretreatment, pre and post en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth.


Description:

Prior to enrollment of each subject into the study, they will be examined completely to determine the orthodontic treatment plan. The operator will inform them about the aim of the study and ask them to provide a written informed consent. Self-drilling titanium mini-implants (1.6mm diameter and 8mm length) will be used. They will be inserted between the maxillary second premolar and first molar at approximately 8-10 mm above the archwires at the mucogingival junction and will be checked for primary stability (mechanical retention). Then the maxillary first premolar will be extracted. The maxillary arch will be levelled and aligned. The rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") with anterior 8mm height soldered hooks distal to the canines will be inserted. A removable device containing a small electrical circuit will be applied to each patient to supply the required electric current. Each patient in the electrical group will be asked to wear a removable device containing a small electrical circuit that will supply the required electric current for five hours a day until the completion the retraction of the upper anterior teeth. (250-300) g force will be applied on each side using two NiTi springs attached between the mini-implants and the soldered hooks in a direction approximately parallel to the occlusal plane for conducting an en-masse retraction. The force level will be measured every 2 weeks. Retraction will be stopped when a class I canine relationship will be achieved and a good incisor relationship will be obtained. The duration of retraction will be calculated by calculating the time required to achieve complete retraction of the upper anterior teeth through clinical examination. Panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs will be obtained pretreatment, pre and post en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth, to assess the skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes. Periodontal health will be assessed at the beginning of orthodontic treatment, before and after en-masse retraction by evaluating the following parameters: plaque index, gingival index, bleeding index, probing depth and gingival recession.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 32
Est. completion date December 5, 2021
Est. primary completion date February 12, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 16 Years to 25 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult healthy patients, Male and female, Age range: 15-27 years. 2. Class II Division 1 malocclusion : - Mild / moderate skeletal Class II (sagittal discrepancy angle =7) - Overjet =10 - Normal or excessive facial height (Clinically and then cephalometrically assessed using these three angles : mandibular/cranial base angle, maxillary/mandibular plane angle and facial axis angle) - Mild to moderate crowding = 4 3. Permanent occlusion. 4. Existence of all the upper teeth (except third molars). 5. Good oral and periodontal health: - Probing depth < 4 mm - No radiographic evidence of bone loss. - Gingival index = 1 - Plaque index = 1 Exclusion Criteria: 1. Medical problems that affect tooth movement (corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), …) 2. Presence of primary teeth in the maxillary arch 3. Missing permanent maxillary teeth (except third molars). 4. Poor oral hygiene or Current periodontal disease: - Probing depth = 4 mm - radiographic evidence of bone loss - Gingival index > 1 - Plaque index > 1 5. Patient had previous orthodontic treatment

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Low-intensity electrical current (LIEC)
Each patient in the electrical group will be asked to wear a removable device containing a small electrical circuit that will supply the required electric current for five hours a day until the completion the retraction of the upper anterior teeth.
Traditional fixed orthodontic appliance
The maxillary arch will be levelled and aligned. The rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") with anterior 8mm height soldered hooks distal to the canines will be inserted. (250-300) g force will be applied on each side using two NiTi springs attached between the mini-implants and the soldered hooks in a direction approximately parallel to the occlusal plane for conducting an en-masse retraction.

Locations

Country Name City State
Syrian Arab Republic University of Damascus Damascus

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Damascus University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Syrian Arab Republic, 

References & Publications (6)

Chaudhari SD, Sharma KK, Marchetto JJ, Hydren JR, Burton BM, Moreno AP. Modulating OPG and TGF-ß1 mRNA expression via bioelectrical stimulation. Bone Rep. 2021 Oct 9;15:101141. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101141. eCollection 2021 Dec. — View Citation

Davidovitch Z, Finkelson MD, Steigman S, Shanfeld JL, Montgomery PC, Korostoff E. Electric currents, bone remodeling, and orthodontic tooth movement. II. Increase in rate of tooth movement and periodontal cyclic nucleotide levels by combined force and electric current. Am J Orthod. 1980 Jan;77(1):33-47. — View Citation

Gkantidis N, Mistakidis I, Kouskoura T, Pandis N. Effectiveness of non-conventional methods for accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2014 Oct;42(10):1300-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 27. Review. — View Citation

Masella RS, Meister M. Current concepts in the biology of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4):458-68. Review. — View Citation

Spadari GS, Zaniboni E, Vedovello SA, Santamaria MP, do Amaral ME, Dos Santos GM, Esquisatto MA, Mendonca FA, Santamaria M Jr. Electrical stimulation enhances tissue reorganization during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1759-6. Epub 2016 Feb 26. — View Citation

Zaniboni E, Bagne L, Camargo T, do Amaral MEC, Felonato M, de Andrade TAM, Dos Santos GMT, Caetano GF, Esquisatto MAM, Santamaria M Jr, Mendonça FAS. Do electrical current and laser therapies improve bone remodeling during an orthodontic treatment with corticotomy? Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4083-4097. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02845-9. Epub 2019 Feb 15. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Duration of en-masse retraction of anterior teeth Assessment will be performed by calculating the time required to achieve complete retraction of the upper anterior teeth (six teeth) through clinical examination. The months required to complete the retraction procedure will be recorded. Completion of this procedure is expected to be occur within six months in the experimental group and eight months in the control group.
Primary Change in the SN-U1 angle This angle the represents the relationship of the upper anterior teeth with SN in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Primary Change in the SNA angle This angle the represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Primary Change in the MM angle This angle the represents the amount of vertical divergence between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Secondary Change in the Nasolabial angle This angle the represents the relationship of the upper lip with nose in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Secondary Change in the Li-E Line This measurement represents the relationship between the upper lip and the Ricketts line in cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable will be measured in mm. : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Secondary Change in Root Length The root length will be measured for each root of six upper anterior teeth using panorama imaging, the change will be calculated between before and after images in mm. This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Secondary Change in the Plaque index The plaque index will be used to assess the status of the oral hygiene in these patients. This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Secondary Change in the Gingival Index The Gingival index will be used to assess the status of the gingival tissues around the teeth. This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Secondary Change in the Bleeding Index The Bleeding index will be used to assess the status of periodontal tissues and the amount of congestion in the gingival margins around the anterior teeth. This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Secondary Change in the Probing Depth This will be measured in millimeters from the gingival margin to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket around the six anterior teeth. Two measurements are required for this calculation: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
Secondary Change in the Gingival Recession This will be measured in millimeters from the cement-enamel junction to the level of the gingival margin around the six anterior teeth. Two measurements are required for this calculation: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05440526 - the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT06024382 - The Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Functional Treatment of Skeletal Class II Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT05684510 - Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy N/A
Completed NCT05265416 - Pain and Discomfort in Two Acceleration Methods of Canine Retraction N/A
Completed NCT02000557 - Photographic Analysis of Soft Tissue Facial Profile in Patients With Class II Malocclusion N/A
Completed NCT05592977 - Effect of Bilateral Distalization of Upper First Molars in a Group of Patients After Extraction of Maxillary Second Molars N/A
Completed NCT05227859 - Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement N/A
Completed NCT05555719 - Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Different Fixed Functional Appliances for Correction of Class II Malocclusion: A Comparative Clinical Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06116500 - Effectiveness of Modified Functional Appliance With Expander N/A
Completed NCT06209086 - Effects of Skeletal Anchored Versus Incisal Capped Twin Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion N/A
Completed NCT05466344 - the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored Semi-rigid One Phase 2/Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05166928 - Effect of Upper Third Molar Extraction on Distalization Carriere Motion Appliance :A Prospective Clinical Study N/A
Completed NCT05652244 - Evaluation of the Levels of Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairment With Two Techniques of Retraction N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06308640 - Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography N/A
Completed NCT05656898 - Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction N/A
Completed NCT05647720 - Effect of Maxillary Third Molar Extraction vs. Non-extraction on Distalization of First Molars in a Group of Adolescent Patients N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03863275 - Analysis of Muscle Activity With Myofunctional Devices, Using Surface Electromyography N/A
Completed NCT06209125 - Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effect of the New Hybrid Aesthetic Functional Appliance N/A
Completed NCT05418413 - The Use of an Esthetic Twin Block for Patients With Mandibular Retrusion N/A
Recruiting NCT05597748 - Modified Herbst Approach to Improve Chin Projection N/A