tDCS and Metacognitive Strategy Training in Stroke

Chronic Stroke Clinical Trial

Official title:

Pilot Testing of tDCS and Metacognitive Strategy Training in Chronic Stroke

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05248178
• Other study ID #: 2076763
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 31, 2022
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: May 2024
• Source: University of Missouri-Columbia
• Contact: Anna E Boone, PhD, OTR/L
• Phone: 573-882-7023
• Email: booneae[@]umsystem.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Specific Aim 1: Complete pilot testing of study protocol in individuals with chronic stroke for feasibility evaluation and protocol refinement. Specific Aim 2: Estimate the preliminary effect of CO-OP+tDCS on activity performance in individuals with chronic stroke.

Description:

A number of daily life activities are discontinued after stroke. These discontinued activities typically include basic self-care, instrumental activities of daily living, leisure, and work. These changes in participation contribute to decreased quality of life and life satisfaction. The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach is a behavioral problem-solving intervention that focuses on teaching clients how to apply cognitive strategies to enhance learning and overcome activity performance barriers.

CO-OP uses meaningful, client-chosen activities to drive new skill learning and neural reorganization. Consistent with these principles of neuroplasticity, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method of modulating cortical excitability through application of low currents to targeted regions on the scalp.

There are known positive effects of CO-OP to improve activity performance and for tDCS to improve impairment level outcomes post-stroke. The investigators hypothesize that the known effects of CO-OP may be amplified with use of tDCS to alter known neural hubs of executive networks that support problem-solving. In sum, (1) CO-OP is effective at improving activity performance, and (2) the effects of CO-OP may be amplified through novel methods that allow for placing the brain in an enhanced neuroplastic state, such as tDCS.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 28
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: July 31, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 85 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• >6 months post-ischemic stroke

• not currently receiving therapy services

• a minimum of four self-identified functional goals

Exclusion Criteria:

• severe depressive symptoms (>20 on Patient Health Questionnaire)

• dementia symptoms (<24 on Montreal Cognitive Assessment)

• any additional neurological disorders

• moderate-severe aphasia (NIH Stroke Scale aphasia scale of greater than or equal to 2)

• any tDCS contraindication

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Stroke
• Stroke

Intervention

Behavioral:
• CO-OP Procedures
CO-OP focuses on learning of a global problem-solving strategy, Goal-Plan-Do-Check (GPDC), within the performance of participant-chosen goals. Use of a broadly applicable strategy and meaningful activity ensures the intervention is salient to the participant and increases likelihood of transfer. Uniquely, therapists applying CO-OP use guided discovery methods to support participants in analyzing their own performance of a given task and generating potential solutions for improving performance. Participants become equipped with these skills through repetitive application of the Goal-Plan-Do-Check process.The intervention focuses on learning GPDC with gradual withdrawal of guided discovery methods.

Device:
• tDCS
Each session will begin with 20 minutes of anodal tDCS applied to the ipsilesional dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at 1.5 mA. The cathode will be placed over the contralesional supraorbital area. Direct current will be applied through two saline soaked sponges placed on the scalp. The tDCS device contains software for double-blinded delivery.

Behavioral:
• Computer Cognitive Training Procedures
Individuals receiving computerized cognitive training will receive an equal dosage of 12, 45-minute sessions directly following the assigned tDCS condition. The online training software of BrainHQ will be used. BrainHQ is a well-recognized cognitive training program that targets the areas of attention, memory, processing speed, people skills, intelligence, and navigation. BrainHQ tracks progress and automatically grades difficulty as appropriate.

Device:
• sham tDCS group
Sham tDCS will involve the same preparation as in tDCS, but the current will ramp up for only 30 seconds and then return to zero. This method allows for sensations on the scalp associated with tDCS without inducing any neural changes.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Missouri Occupational Therapy Department	Columbia	Missouri

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Missouri-Columbia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (52)

Abbott JH. The distinction between randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and preliminary feasibility and pilot studies: what they are and are not. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Aug;44(8):555-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0110. No abstract available. — View Citation

Appelros P, Samuelsson M, Karlsson-Tivenius S, Lokander M, Terent A. A national stroke quality register: 12 years experience from a participating hospital. Eur J Neurol. 2007 Aug;14(8):890-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01826.x. — View Citation

Babulal GM, Foster ER, Wolf TJ. Facilitating Transfer of Skills and Strategies in Occupational Therapy Practice: Practical Application of Transfer Principles. Asian J Occup Ther. 2016;11(1):19-25. doi: 10.11596/asiajot.11.19. Epub 2016 Mar 31. — View Citation

Baum CM, Christiansen, C. Bass, J.D. The Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) Model. In: Occupational Therapy: Performance, Participation, and Well-Being. 4th ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2015:49-56.

Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jimenez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Mackey RH, Matsushita K, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Thiagarajan RR, Reeves MJ, Ritchey M, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sasson C, Towfighi A, Tsao CW, Turner MB, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10 ):e646. Circulation. 2017 Sep 5;136(10 ):e196. — View Citation

Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, Mourdoukoutas AP, Kronberg G, Truong D, Boggio P, Brunoni AR, Charvet L, Fregni F, Fritsch B, Gillick B, Hamilton RH, Hampstead BM, Jankord R, Kirton A, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Liu A, Loo C, Nitsche MA, Reis J, Richardson JD, Rotenberg A, Turkeltaub PE, Woods AJ. Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):641-661. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 15. — View Citation

Bolognini N, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Mar 17;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-8. — View Citation

Boone AE, Frey, S. H., & Wolf, T. J. . Acceptability and toleratbility of Metacognitive Strategy Training + tDCS in Chronic Stroke. Manuscript in Preparation. 2020.

Bosch J, O'Donnell MJ, Barreca S, Thabane L, Wishart L. Does task-oriented practice improve upper extremity motor recovery after stroke? A systematic review. ISRN Stroke. 2014;2014.

Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.7.864. — View Citation

Cunningham DA, Machado A, Janini D, Varnerin N, Bonnett C, Yue G, Jones S, Lowe M, Beall E, Sakaie K, Plow EB. Assessment of inter-hemispheric imbalance using imaging and noninvasive brain stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.419. Epub 2014 Sep 3. — View Citation

Dawson DR, McEwen, S. E., and Polatajko, H.J. Cognitive Orientation to daily Performance in Occupational Therapy. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; 2017.

Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Bourget A. Predictors of long-term participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Feb 28;28(4):221-30. doi: 10.1080/09638280500158372. — View Citation

Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, Bond CM. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016. — View Citation

Ferreira IS, Pinto CB, Saleh Velez FG, Leffa DT, Vulcano de Toledo Piza P, Fregni F. Recruitment challenges in stroke neurorecovery clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 5;15:100404. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100404. eCollection 2019 Sep. Erratum In: Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Dec 10;20:100689. — View Citation

French B, Leathley M, Sutton C, McAdam J, Thomas L, Forster A, Langhorne P, Price C, Walker A, Watkins C. A systematic review of repetitive functional task practice with modelling of resource use, costs and effectiveness. Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jul;12(30):iii, ix-x, 1-117. doi: 10.3310/hta12300. — View Citation

French B, Thomas L, Leathley M, Sutton C, McAdam J, Forster A, Langhorne P, Price C, Walker A, Watkins C. Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Jan;42(1):9-14. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0473. — View Citation

French B, Thomas LH, Leathley MJ, Sutton CJ, McAdam J, Forster A, Langhorne P, Price CI, Walker A, Watkins CL. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD006073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006073.pub2. — View Citation

Gage M, Noh S, Polatajko HJ, Kaspar V. Measuring perceived self-efficacy in occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 1994 Sep;48(9):783-90. doi: 10.5014/ajot.48.9.783. — View Citation

Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Apr 15;29(7):559-66. doi: 10.1080/09638280600924996. — View Citation

Henshaw E, Polatajko H, McEwen S, Ryan JD, Baum CM. Cognitive approach to improving participation after stroke: two case studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Jan-Feb;65(1):55-63. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.09010. — View Citation

Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics: The Journal of Applied Statistics in the Pharmaceutical Industry. 2005;4(4):287-291.

Kandel M, Beis JM, Le Chapelain L, Guesdon H, Paysant J. Non-invasive cerebral stimulation for the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Dec;55(9-10):657-80. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Sep 29. English, French. — View Citation

Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;87(4):345-55. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311242. Epub 2015 Aug 28. — View Citation

Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Feb;51(1):S225-39. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018). — View Citation

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. — View Citation

Lang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ, Dromerick AW, Birkenmeier RL. Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):342-54. doi: 10.1002/ana.24734. Epub 2016 Aug 16. — View Citation

Law MC, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko HJ, Pollock N. Canadian occupational performance measure. 5th ed: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Toronto; 2014.

Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, Cotelli M, De Ridder D, Ferrucci R, Langguth B, Marangolo P, Mylius V, Nitsche MA, Padberg F, Palm U, Poulet E, Priori A, Rossi S, Schecklmann M, Vanneste S, Ziemann U, Garcia-Larrea L, Paulus W. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29. — View Citation

Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Oct 28. — View Citation

Martini R, Rios J, Polatajko H, Wolf T, McEwen S. The performance quality rating scale (PQRS): reliability, convergent validity, and internal responsiveness for two scoring systems. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(3):231-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.913702. Epub 2014 Apr 28. — View Citation

Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Aug;83(8):1035-42. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33984. — View Citation

McEwen S, Polatajko H, Baum C, Rios J, Cirone D, Doherty M, Wolf T. Combined Cognitive-Strategy and Task-Specific Training Improve Transfer to Untrained Activities in Subacute Stroke: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Jul;29(6):526-36. doi: 10.1177/1545968314558602. Epub 2014 Nov 21. — View Citation

Moore CG, Carter RE, Nietert PJ, Stewart PW. Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):332-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x. — View Citation

Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. Erratum In: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991. — View Citation

Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:255-76. doi: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70230-2. No abstract available. — View Citation

Ostwald SK, Godwin KM, Cron SG. Predictors of life satisfaction in stroke survivors and spousal caregivers after inpatient rehabilitation. Rehabil Nurs. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):160-7, 174; discussion 174. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2009.tb00272.x. — View Citation

Park SH, Koh EJ, Choi HY, Ko MH. A double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot study to assess the effects of the concomitant use of transcranial direct current stimulation with the computer assisted cognitive rehabilitation to the prefrontal cortex on cognitive functions in patients with stroke. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013 Dec;54(6):484-8. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2013.54.6.484. Epub 2013 Dec 31. — View Citation

Polatajko H, McEwen S, Ryan J, Baum C. Comparing skill acquisition using a cognitive-based treatment approach to contemporary occupational therapy in stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2009;90(10):e31.

Polatajko HJ, McEwen SE, Ryan JD, Baum CM. Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2012 Jan-Feb;66(1):104-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.001784. — View Citation

Skidmore ER, Dawson DR, Butters MA, Grattan ES, Juengst SB, Whyte EM, Begley A, Holm MB, Becker JT. Strategy Training Shows Promise for Addressing Disability in the First 6 Months After Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Aug;29(7):668-76. doi: 10.1177/1545968314562113. Epub 2014 Dec 11. — View Citation

Skidmore ER, Dawson DR, Whyte EM, Butters MA, Dew MA, Grattan ES, Becker JT, Holm MB. Developing complex interventions: lessons learned from a pilot study examining strategy training in acute stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Apr;28(4):378-87. doi: 10.1177/0269215513502799. Epub 2013 Oct 10. — View Citation

Sweet L, Van Adel M, Metcalf V, Wright L, Harley A, Leiva R, Taler V. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in geriatric rehabilitation: psychometric properties and association with rehabilitation outcomes. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011 Dec;23(10):1582-91. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211001451. Epub 2011 Aug 1. — View Citation

Tedesco Triccas L, Burridge JH, Hughes AM, Pickering RM, Desikan M, Rothwell JC, Verheyden G. Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):946-955. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.067. Epub 2015 May 4. — View Citation

Toglia J. Weekly calendar planning activity: A performance test of executive function. AOTA Press; 2015.

Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004 Dec;18(8):833-62. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr843oa. — View Citation

Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, Dickson VV, Melkus GD, Carod-Artal FJ, Rocco G, Alvaro R. Psychometric evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):229-41. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145. — View Citation

Waddell KJ, Strube MJ, Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW, Lang CE. Does Task-Specific Training Improve Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):290-300. doi: 10.1177/1545968316680493. Epub 2016 Dec 13. — View Citation

Weintraub S, Dikmen SS, Heaton RK, Tulsky DS, Zelazo PD, Slotkin J, Carlozzi NE, Bauer PJ, Wallner-Allen K, Fox N, Havlik R, Beaumont JL, Mungas D, Manly JJ, Moy C, Conway K, Edwards E, Nowinski CJ, Gershon R. The cognition battery of the NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function: validation in an adult sample. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):567-78. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000320. Epub 2014 Jun 24. — View Citation

Wolf TJ, Doherty M, Kallogjeri D, Coalson RS, Nicklaus J, Ma CX, Schlaggar BL, Piccirillo J. The Feasibility of Using Metacognitive Strategy Training to Improve Cognitive Performance and Neural Connectivity in Women with Chemotherapy-Induced Cognitive Impairment. Oncology. 2016;91(3):143-52. doi: 10.1159/000447744. Epub 2016 Jul 23. — View Citation

Wolf TJ, Polatajko H, Baum C, Rios J, Cirone D, Doherty M, McEwen S. Combined Cognitive-Strategy and Task-Specific Training Affects Cognition and Upper-Extremity Function in Subacute Stroke: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr;70(2):7002290010p1-7002290010p10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.017293. — View Citation

Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR, Celnik P, Cohen LG, Fregni F, Herrmann CS, Kappenman ES, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Paulus W, Priori A, Reato D, Stagg C, Wenderoth N, Nitsche MA. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1031-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 22. — View Citation

* Note: There are 52 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Willingness to be randomized	Percent of eligible participants willing to be randomized	After study completion, an average of 5 weeks
Primary	Recruitment	Number enrolled/number screened AND number recruited per month	After study completion, an average of 5 weeks
Primary	Retention	Number completing study procedures/number enrolled	After study completion, an average of 5 weeks
Primary	Adherence	Number of sessions attended/total number of sessions	After study completion, an average of 5 weeks
Secondary	Canadian Occupational Performance Measure	Self-report measure of activity performance. Minimum = 1, Maximum = 10. Higher scores mean better performance.	Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 5), 1-month follow up (week 9)
Secondary	Performance Quality Rating Scale	Objective measure activity performance. Minimum = 1, Maximum = 10. Higher scores mean better performance.	Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 5), 1-month follow up (week 9)
Secondary	National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery	Computerized measure of cognitive precesses (e.g. executive function, attention, working memory.) A crystalized intelligence composite T-score and fluid intelligence T-score with means of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 will be used in analysis. Higher scores represent better performance.	Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 5), 1-month follow up (week 9)
Secondary	Weekly Calendar Planning Assessment	Performance-based measure of executive function within a simulated calendar planning task. Level II will be used. Total appointments entered correctly and an efficiency score will be used in analysis. Higher scores represent better performance.	Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 5), 1-month follow up (week 9)
Secondary	Participation Strategies-Self-efficacy Scale (PS-SES)	Self-report measure of confidence in performing daily activities. It consists of 35 items in six domains. Each item is rated on a scale of 1 to 10 with higher scores representing greater self-efficacy.	Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 5), 1-month follow up (week 9)
Secondary	Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) - Participation domain	Self-report measure of participation in daily life activities. The participation domain consists of 8 items with resulting scores from 0 to 100 and higher scores representing higher levels of participation.	Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 5), 1-month follow up (week 9)