Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Clinical Trial
— BELIEVEOfficial title:
A Multi-center, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Combination With Topical Treatment (Calcipotriol/Betamethasone) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis and Insufficient Response to Classic Systemic Treatment (BELIEVE)
NCT number | NCT00574249 |
Other study ID # | M10-060 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 3 |
First received | December 12, 2007 |
Last updated | April 11, 2011 |
Start date | November 2007 |
Verified date | April 2011 |
Source | Abbott |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Turkey: Ethics Committee |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in combination with topical psoriasis treatment, calcipotriol/betamethasone, vs. adalimumab in combination with matching vehicle in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 730 |
Est. completion date | |
Est. primary completion date | October 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subject is >= 18 years of age - Subject had a clinical diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months, and has moderate to severe plaque psoriasis - Subject must have been treated and failed to respond to, or has a contraindication to, or is intolerant to at least two different systemic therapies, one of which must be cyclosporine, or methotrexate or oral PUVA - Subject is judged to be in generally good health as determined by the principal investigator Exclusion Criteria: - Subject has previous exposure to adalimumab - Subject cannot discontinue systemic therapies and/or topical therapies for the treatment of psoriasis and cannot avoid UVB or PUVA phototherapy - Subject is taking or requires oral or injectible corticosteroids - Subject diagnosed with erythrodermic psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, medication-induced or medication-exacerbated psoriasis or new onset guttate psoriasis - Subject considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate - Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant - Subject has a calcium metabolism disorder |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Abbott |
Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI75 Response at Week 16 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0.0 (best) to 72.0 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 16 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score. Positive percent decreases indicate improvement, with best improvement being 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage of participants who had at least a 75% PASI score decrease. | Week 0 and Week 16 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a PASI50 Response at Week 16 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0.0 (best) to 72.0 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 16 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score. Positive percent decreases indicate improvement, with best improvement 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage of participants who had at least a 50% PASI score decrease. | Week 0 and Week 16 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 16 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0.0 (best) to 72.0 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 16 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score. Positive percent decreases indicate improvement, with best improvement 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage of participants who had at least a 90% PASI score decrease. | Week 0 and Week 16 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | PASI100 is defined as at least a 100% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0.0 (best) to 72.0 (worst) with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 16 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score. Positive percent decreases indicate improvement, with best improvement 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage of participants who had at least a 100% PASI score decrease. | Week 0 and Week 16 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Minimal at Week 2 | PGA is a physician's assessment of severity of disease (grading lesion severity). PGA scores range from 0 (best) to 6 (worst): on the 6-point scale, a score of 0 = Clear and a score of 6 = Very Severe for the lesion severity. PGA Clear (0) is no plaque elevation over normal skin and no scale with or without erythema. Minimal (1) is possible plaque elevation but difficult to ascertain a slight elevation above normal skin. Percentage of participants: 0% to 100% (best). | Week 2 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Minimal at Week 4 | PGA is a physician's assessment of severity of disease (grading lesion severity). PGA scores range from 0 (best) to 6 (worst): on the 6-point scale, a score of 0 = Clear and a score of 6 = Very Severe for the lesion severity. PGA Clear (0) is no plaque elevation over normal skin and no scale with or without erythema. Minimal (1) is possible plaque elevation but difficult to ascertain a slight elevation above normal skin. Percentage of participants: 0% to 100% (best). | Week 4 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Minimal at Week 8 | PGA is a physician's assessment of severity of disease (grading lesion severity). PGA scores range from 0 (best) to 6 (worst): on the 6-point scale, a score of 0 = Clear and a score of 6 = Very Severe for the lesion severity. PGA Clear (0) is no plaque elevation over normal skin and no scale with or without erythema. Minimal (1) is possible plaque elevation but difficult to ascertain a slight elevation above normal skin. Percentage of participants: 0% to 100% (best). | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Minimal at Week 12 | PGA is a physician's assessment of severity of disease (grading lesion severity). PGA scores range from 0 (best) to 6 (worst): on the 6-point scale, a score of 0 = Clear and a score of 6 = Very Severe for the lesion severity. PGA Clear (0) is no plaque elevation over normal skin and no scale with or without erythema. Minimal (1) is possible plaque elevation but difficult to ascertain a slight elevation above normal skin. Percentage of participants: 0% to 100% (best). | Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physicians Global Assessment (PGA) Response of Clear or Minimal at Week 16 | PGA is a physician's assessment of severity of disease (grading lesion severity). PGA scores range from 0 (best) to 6 (worst): on the 6-point scale, a score of 0 = Clear and a score of 6 = Very Severe for the lesion severity. PGA Clear (0) is no plaque elevation over normal skin and no scale with or without erythema. Minimal (1) is possible plaque elevation but difficult to ascertain a slight elevation above normal skin. Percentage of participants: 0% to 100% (best). | Week 16 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | DLQI is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which (i.e., how much) the subject's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much, a lot, a little, or not at all. Total score range: 0 (best) to 30 (worst). Negative change and percent change from Baseline indicate improvement, with best improvement -100%. | Week 0 and Week 16 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 2 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | DLQI is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which (i.e., how much) the subject's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much, a lot, a little, or not at all. Total score range: 0 (best) to 30 (worst). Negative change and percent change from Baseline indicate improvement, with best improvement -100%. | Week 0 and Week 2 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 4 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | DLQI is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which (i.e., how much) the subject's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much, a lot, a little, or not at all. Total score range: 0 (best) to 30 (worst). Negative change and percent change from Baseline indicate improvement, with best improvement -100%. | Week 0 and Week 4 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 8 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | DLQI is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which (i.e., how much) the subject's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much, a lot, a little, or not at all. Total score range: 0 (best) to 30 (worst). Negative change and percent change from Baseline indicate improvement, with best improvement -100%. | Week 0 and Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 12 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | DLQI is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which (i.e., how much) the subject's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much, a lot, a little, or not at all. Total score range: 0 (best) to 30 (worst). Negative change and percent change from Baseline indicate improvement, with best improvement -100%. | Week 0 and Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 16 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) is a participant-reported outcome that employs a questionnaire that asks for the participant's views about their health. Percent change at Week 16 is calculated as (Week 16 SF-36 PCS minus Week 0 SF-36 PCS) divided by Week 0 SF-36 PCS. Positive percent change in score indicates improvement, with best improvement 100%. | Week 0 and Week 16 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 8 Compared With Baseline (Week 0) | Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) is a participant-reported outcome that employs a questionnaire that asks for the participant's views about their health. Percent change at Week 8 is calculated as (Week 8 SF-36 PCS minus Week 0 SF-36 PCS) divided by Week 0 SF-36 PCS. Positive percent change in score indicates improvement, with best improvement 100%. | Week 0 and Week 8 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03598790 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00799877 -
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis (Ps) Registry
|
||
Completed |
NCT02581345 -
Phase 3 Study of M923 and Humira® in Subjects With Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01200264 -
Apremilast for Chronic Plaque Psoriasis (CPP) Patients Who Have Failed One Course of Biologic Therapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00972543 -
Raptiva in Palm and Sole Psoriasis
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00707070 -
Combining Acitretin and Efalizumab in the Therapy of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00539929 -
Paired-Comparison Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of E6201 Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Plaque-Type Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02852967 -
A Phase 2, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil in Subjects With Moderate/Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00770965 -
Phase II Efficacy Study Looking at a Single-dose of One of Three Dose Levels of AIN457 in Patients With Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06011733 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Chinese Adult Study Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00245765 -
Efficacy Study of CDP870 in Subjects With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Who Are Candidate for Systemic Therapy and/or Phototherapy/Photochemotherapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00673556 -
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Psoriasis Patients for Whom Conventional Treatment is Ineffective or Inappropriate
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00844363 -
Narrowband UVB Phototherapy in the Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00512187 -
Moderate Weight Loss Makes Obese Patients With Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Responsive to Sub-Optimal Dose of Cyclosporine: an Investigator Blinded, Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02570750 -
The Effect Of Smoking Status Of The Patient On The Success Of Etanercept Therapy In Psoriasis
|
||
Completed |
NCT00438360 -
Efficacy and Safety of Cyclosporine A Microemulsion in Maintenance Patients With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03897075 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of Tildrakizumab in the Treatment of Nail Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01358578 -
Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab Compared to Etanercept in Subjects With Moderate to Severe, Chronic Plaque-Type Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03536884 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab Compared to an Active Comparator in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03230292 -
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Adult Patients With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 |