View clinical trials related to Chronic Disease.
Filter by:This study is designed to evaluate the effect of fluticasone furoate (FF, GW685698)/vilanterol (VI, GW642444) Inhalation Powder once daily (QD) on arterial stiffness compared with Tiotropium QD over 12 week treatment period in subjects with COPD and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) > 12.0 m/s at Visit 1. Arterial stiffness will be measured as aPWV. This is a comparator, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multi-centre study. Subjects who meet the eligibility criteria at Screening and meet the randomization criteria at the end of a 2-week Run-In period will enter a 12-week treatment period. There will be an approximate 7-day Follow-up period after the treatment period.
Patients with moderate COPD as defined by GOLD guidelines constitute almost 46% to 54% of all diagnosed COPD patients. Yet limited data exists on characterizing this study population in terms of drug therapy patterns and COPD-related resource use and costs. The objective of the following study was to conduct an analysis in the real-world setting to (1) identify and characterize COPD patients with moderate exacerbations and (2) evaluate the impact of initiating different maintenance therapies in this population. Maintenance therapy medications include inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting beta agonists (LABAs), combination of ICS+LABA, and anticholinergics (ACs) including tiotropium (TIO) and ipratropium or combination ipratropium-albuterol (collectively referred to as ipratropium [IPR]).
The overall long term objective of this research is to improve health care utilization and quality of life of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients and family. Understanding the process of transition to a chronic medical condition during the acute (3 weeks after transplant) and long term (3 and 6 months) will significantly guide the development of clinical interventions aimed at maximizing adherence and family psychosocial adjustment.
The objective of this observational study is to collect and evaluate data on medication adherence of patients on maintenance COPD therapy with long-acting anticholinergic (e.g. Spiriva® delivered by HandiHaler® or Respimat®) using the MMAS-8 questionnaire.
The purpose of this study is to assess if 12 weeks' treatment with GSK573719 Inhalation Powder is safe and effective compared with placebo or no active drug intake, when administered once-daily in subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by chronic airflow limitation caused by inflammation-mediated damage to lung tissue. Although damage to lung tissue in COPD appears to be irreversible, evidence suggests that the course of COPD can be altered through measures such as smoking cessation, pulmonary rehabilitation, and the use of pharmacotherapy for bronchodilation. A primary goal of maintenance pharmacotherapy is to reduce the incidence of acute exacerbations and the associated hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. Bronchodilation in COPD maintenance therapy can be accomplished with the long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium (TIO), long acting beta-agonists (e.g. formoterol, salmeterol), methylxanthines (e.g. theophylline), or combination therapy with a long-acting beta-agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid (e.g. fluticasone propionate/salmeterol [FSC]). The objective of this study is to compare the benefits of combination long-acting beta-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid therapy to long-acting anticholinergic therapy. The study compares the risk of COPD exacerbations and COPD-related healthcare utilization and costs for commercially-insured patients age 40 and older who were prescribed FSC to those prescribed TIO. The null hypothesis is that no difference exists between the costs and outcomes of COPD patients treated with TIO and those treated with FSC. The test hypothesis is that patients treated with either TIO or FSC will incur lower costs and use fewer healthcare resources for the management of COPD. The source of data for this study was the Ingenix Impact database (formerly the Integrated Healthcare Information Services [IHCIS] database). This is an administrative claims database that includes patient-level data on enrollment, facility, professional, and pharmacy services from approximately 50 million patients covered by more than 40 managed care health plans across the United States (US). The study design is a retrospective cohort study.
Blood samples and health information (e.g., age at diagnosis, test results) are collected for the purposes of genetic research. The blood samples are assigned a number and stored in a repository for safe keeping until they are needed for a research project. Participants are persons who are healthy (not having high blood pressure, diabetes, or high cholesterol levels) or persons who have Diabetes Mellitus Type II(T2D) and live in Indiana. Participants complete a questionnaire at the time the blood sample is drawn. Visits are repeated at 2 and 5 years after initial contact. Researchers apply to the Fairbanks Institute for use of the blood samples and health information minus participant names and contact information. Their research is required to be related to find genes or substances made by genes that may be involved in Diabetes Mellitus Type II with the purpose of improving the investigators understanding of the illness potentially leading to the development of new diagnostic tools for identifying the illness, new treatments,or preventative measures.
The specific aim of this study is to describe 1 year Advair dispensing rates for patients with COPD, and to measure the association between Advair adherence and healthcare utilization (e.g. emergency room visits and inpatient admissions, etc.). To compare the risk of a COPD exacerbation (moderate or severe) during a 3-month follow-up period between patients thqat are adherent versus those that are not.
This retrospective database study will assess differences in the risk of re-hospitalization and other COPD-related exacerbations and costs for patients receiving fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate combination 250/50 (FSC) versus anticholinergics [i.e. tiotropium (TIO) and ipratropium or combination ipratropium-albuterol (collectively referred to as ipratropium - IPR)] post-hospitalization or Emergency Department (ED) visit for the treatment of COPD. This is a hypotheses testing study. Associations are compared between FSC and AC cohorts. Hypotheses for the primary outcome and key secondary outcomes are presented below: Specifically the study hypotheses for the primary outcome being tested were: Ho: There is no difference in risk of COPD-related hospitalization between FSC and AC Ha: There is a difference in risk of COPD-related hospitalization between FSC and AC Hypothesis for the key secondary outcome of COPD-related costs that was tested was: Ho: There is no difference in COPD-related costs between FSC and AC Ha: There is a difference in COPD-related costs between FSC and AC
This was a retrospective cohort design using administrative claims data from Jan 1, 2003 through Sep 30, 2007, representing the years of available data, were used for this study. Managed care enrollees having at least one pharmacy claim for tiotropium (TIO) during the study period were identified as the target population. An index TIO prescription was defined as the first chronologically occurring pharmacy claim for TIO during the period Jan 1, 2004 to Aug 31, 2006, called the enrollment period. The date of the index TIO prescription was termed as the index Rx date, and the 1-year period before the index Rx date was termed as the pre-index period. The period after the index date was termed as the post-index date, and is further divided into a 30-day combination assessment period and a 1-year follow-up period. COPD clinical and economic outcomes were measured in a variable length follow up period. The combination assessment period, defined as the 30-day period following the index Rx date, was used to categorize patients into 2 cohorts: TIO alone or TIO + FSC (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinofoate combination) depending on whether they use FSC in combination with TIO during this period. Combination therapy with TIO + FSC was defined as having an FSC claim on the same date as the TIO claim or a TIO and FSC pharmacy claim with overlapping days supply occurring within 30 days of index Rx date. Enrollees adding FSC for the first time after the 30-day combination assessment period were excluded from the sample, thus ensuring that the TIO-alone cohort is not using FSC. No outcomes were assessed in the 30-day combination assessment period. The 1-year period after the end of the 30-day combination assessment period was termed as the follow-up period and was used to assess all study outcomes. Enrollees were required to be continuously eligible in their health plans during the pre-index and post-index periods for a total of 25 months. An intent-to-treat approach was used for the analyses. Thus, patients identified to be in a drug therapy cohort were considered to be using that therapy during the entire follow-up period, regardless of therapy discontinuations. Specifically the study hypothesis for the primary outcome being tested was: Ho: There is no difference in risk of any COPD-related exacerbation between TIO+FSC and TIO cohorts Ha: There is a difference in risk of any COPD-related exacerbation between TIO+FSC and TIO cohorts Hypothesis for the key secondary outcome of COPD-related costs that was tested was: Ho: There is no difference in COPD-related costs between TIO+FSC and TIO cohorts Ha: There is a difference in COPD-related costs between TIO+FSC and TIO cohorts