Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02939690
Other study ID # 16-1303
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 2016
Est. completion date March 2018

Study information

Verified date May 2018
Source University of Calgary
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In this randomized clinical study, neonates who require umbilical venous catheter (UVC) insertion as part of their routine care at anytime during their NICU admission will be randomized to one of the 2 formulas for estimation of the pre-insertion UVC depth (umbilicus to the nipple in cm minus 1 (UN - 1) or birth weight based formula ([(3× birth weight (Kg) + 9)/2+1)]. UVC will be inserted under sterile condition as per unit protocol. To verify the UVC tip position, a thoracoabdominal radiograph will be taken. In addition, the investigators will do a ultrasound of the heart to assess the exact location of the catheter tips as soon as possible but within 6 hours of insertion.


Description:

Background:

The ideal position of UVC) tip to minimize complications is just outside the heart at the junction of inferior vena cava and right atrium. UVC related complications are mainly due to catheter malposition. Accurate prediction of insertion length of UVC as well as confirmation of the position after insertion by radiograph or with ultrasound is very important to avoid complications. UVC malposition with subsequent re-positioning exposes these fragile infants to unnecessary handling, further radiologic exposure and increasing risk of infection.

The commonly used formulas to estimate the depth of umbilical catheter include Dunn's shoulder to umbilical length graph and a birth weight based formula proposed by Shukla and Ferrara in 1986. In Calgary, the most commonly used method for estimation of UVC insertion length is the birth weight based formula (i.e. UVC insertion length = (3 x birth weight + 9)/2 +1). The success rate of achieving the optimum position of catheter tip using this formula ranges from 31-40%. A recent retrospective study reported the use of different surface markers for calculating UVC insertion depth. A distance from base of umbilicus to nipple distance (UN)-1 cm provided the best and most accurate insertion depth of UVC. This formula had accuracy rate of 84% compared with 57% accuracy rate with birth weight based formula.

The objectives of our study are:

1. To compare accuracy rate between UVC insertion length estimated by using two formula (i.e. umbilicus to the nipple distance in cm minus 1 (UN - 1) and Shukla's birth weight based formula ([(3× birth weight (Kg) + 9)/2+1)] in achieving optimum UVC tip position

2. To compare the accuracy rate of UVC tip position between two methods based on growth status of neonates

Methods:

This is a randomized clinical study. All infants who require UVC insertion as part of their routine care at anytime during their hospital admission are eligible for the study. Infants with hydrops fetalis, abdominal wall defects, congenital diaphragmatic hernia and/or major structural heart disease will be excluded from the study.

When a newborn baby needs UVC central line insertion, neonate will be randomized to one of the 2 formulas for estimation of the pre-insertion UVC depth. UVC will be inserted under sterile condition as per unit protocol. To verify the UVC tip position, a thoracoabdominal radiograph will be taken. In addition,the investigators will do a ultrasound of the the heart to assess the exact location of the catheter tips as soon as possible but within 6 hours of insertion.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date March 2018
Est. primary completion date March 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A to 2 Weeks
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- All infants who require UVC insertion as part of their routine care at anytime during their NICU admission

Exclusion Criteria:

- Infants with hydrops fetalis, infants with abdominal wall defects, congenital diaphragmatic hernia and major structural heart disease

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
UVC
UVC insertion depth calculated by [(3× birth weight (Kg) + 9)/2+1)]
UVC
UVC insertion depth calculated by umbilicus to nipple distance-1
Ultrasound


Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Foothills Medical Center Calgary Alberta

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Calgary

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (6)

Dunn PM. Localization of the umbilical catheter by post-mortem measurement. Arch Dis Child. 1966 Feb;41(215):69-75. — View Citation

Gupta AO, Peesay MR, Ramasethu J. Simple measurements to place umbilical catheters using surface anatomy. J Perinatol. 2015 Jul;35(7):476-80. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.239. Epub 2015 Jan 22. — View Citation

Harabor A, Soraisham A. Rates of intracardiac umbilical venous catheter placement in neonates. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Sep;33(9):1557-61. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.9.1557. — View Citation

Kieran EA, Laffan EE, O'Donnell CP. Estimating umbilical catheter insertion depth in newborns using weight or body measurement: a randomised trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jan;101(1):F10-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307668. Epub 2015 A — View Citation

Michel F, Brevaut-Malaty V, Pasquali R, Thomachot L, Vialet R, Hassid S, Nicaise C, Martin C, Panuel M. Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray in determining the position of umbilical venous catheters. Resuscitation. 2012 Jun;83(6):705-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resus — View Citation

Shukla H, Ferrara A. Rapid estimation of insertional length of umbilical catheters in newborns. Am J Dis Child. 1986 Aug;140(8):786-8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Proportion of correctly inserted UVC at optimum catheter tip position within 12 hours
Secondary Number of readjustment of UVC within first 2 weeks
Secondary Comparison of UVC tip position between two methods based on based growth status at birth (i.e.AGA, SGA, LGA) AGA: appropriate for gestational age (i.e birth weight between 10th and 90th percentile for gestational age); SGA: Small for gestational age (i.e. birth weight <10th percetile for gestational age); LGA: large for gestational age (i.e.birth weight >90th percentile for gestational age) using Fentons growth chart for preterm infants and WHO growth chart for term infants within 12 hours
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02741453 - Bilateral Internal Jugular Veins Ultrasound Scanning Prior to CVC Placement N/A
Completed NCT02661607 - Point of Care Echocardiography Versus Chest Radiography for the Assessment of Central Venous Catheter Placement N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03442790 - Agitated Saline Versus CXR Confirmation of Central Venous Lines N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04279808 - Adequate Insertion Depth of Dilator During Central Venous Catheterization N/A
Completed NCT01003366 - Effect of the Bevel Direction of Puncture Needle on Success Rate and Complications During Central Venous Catheterization N/A
Completed NCT03841968 - Dynamic SAX vs Conventional LAX in Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization N/A
Completed NCT01543360 - Comparison of Axillary Versus Subclavian Vein Strategies for Central Venous Catheterization Under Continuous Ultrasound Guidance N/A
Withdrawn NCT03348826 - Study of Sodium Bicarbonate in Restoring Blocked Catheters Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04962945 - Comparison of the Oblique-axis and Long-axis Approaches for Axillary Vein Catheterization Under Ultrasound Guidance N/A
Completed NCT04690296 - Ultrasound Guidance Versus Anatomical Landmarks for Subclavian Vein Catheterization N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02264964 - Duration and Adverse Events of Non-cuffed Catheter in Patients With Hemodialysis N/A
Recruiting NCT06050902 - Standard Ultrasound Guidance vs. New Needle-steering Device in Subclavian Venous Catheterization N/A
Completed NCT03395691 - Comparison of the Proximal Approach and Distal Approach of Axillary Vein Catheterization Under Ultrasound Guidance N/A
Completed NCT03741946 - Contralateral Head Rotation on Internal Jugular Vein to Carotid Artery Distance and Overlap Ratio N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04916288 - Needle Puncture Point During Central Venous Catheterization With Ultrasound Guidance
Recruiting NCT05409768 - Comparison of Two Approach in Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Catheterizations N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06375252 - Evaluation of Central Jugular Vein Catheter Lumen Holder Design and Ergonomic Use N/A