Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Clinical Trial
— DCS-ENS-CTSOfficial title:
Effectiveness of Cerebral and Peripheral Electrical Stimulation on Pain and Functional Limitations Associated With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Factorial Clinical Trial
This is a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, factorial clinical trial to study the effectiveness of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation on pain and functional limitations associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The study subjects will be randomly into four groups; (1) active trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) + active trans-cutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), (2) active tDCS + sham TENS, (3) sham tDCS + active TENS and (4) sham tDCS + sham TENS. The patient will be assessed by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), The Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questions (DN4), Quantitative sensory testing (QST), Pain Pressure Test (PPT) with algometer, Conditioned pain modulation (CPM), Patient ratings of improvement, or worsening, of the pain condition, Quality of Life short-form (SF)-36, Visual Analog Mood Scale (VAMS), Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) and Adverse Events Questionnaire (AEs). This study aims to investigate whether cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation combined are more effective in relieving pain and functional limitations than the separate application of electrical stimulation in patients with CTS.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 180 |
Est. completion date | October 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Males and females aged >18 years and <65 years. - Paresthesia, pain or vasomotor symptoms through the distribution of median nerve (persistence > 2 months). - Positive result for Phalen's, Tinel's and/or carpal compression tests during physical examination. - Mild-to-moderate severity of CTS according to American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) 2002 (mild: abnormal sensory peak latency [=3.5ms] with normal motor distal latency [<4.4]; moderate: abnormal sensory [=3.5ms] and motor [=4.4ms] latencies). Exclusion Criteria: - Previous history of wrist surgery - Presence of predisposing etiological factors for CTS (e.g., diabetes mellitus). - Trauma, neurological, psychiatric, rheumatic diseases, renal failure, pregnancy, hypothyroidism, and hyperthyroidism. - Presence of conditions that might cause numbness in the hand, including cervical radiculopathy, cervical ribs, plexopathy, and polyneuropathy. - Pharmacological treatment with oral steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within the previous month. - Participation in a physical therapy program. - Administration of steroid injection(s) within the previous 6 months. - Previous treatment with TENS <6 months. - Previous treatment with tDCS. - Use of pacemakers or other implanted devices. - Pregnancy or breastfeeding. - Refuse to participate. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Suez Canal University | Complejo Hospitalario de Especialidades Juan Ramón Jimenez, Hiroshima University, Université de Sherbrooke |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) | A short, self-report questionnaire includes 4 items that assess pain intensity (pain right now, pain on average in last 24 hours, worst pain in last 24 hours, and least pain in last 24 hours) using an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as can imagine). The mean of these 4 pain items will be used as primary outcome. The BPI also includes 7 items that assess the impact of the pain on functioning using a 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference) rating scale, which will be used as a secondary outcome. | At baseline | |
Primary | Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) | A short, self-report questionnaire includes 4 items that assess pain intensity (pain right now, pain on average in last 24 hours, worst pain in last 24 hours, and least pain in last 24 hours) using an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as can imagine). The mean of these 4 pain items will be used as primary outcome. The BPI also includes 7 items that assess the impact of the pain on functioning using a 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference) rating scale, which will be used as a secondary outcome. | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | To assess depressive symptoms by using the 21-item The cut-off point for depression is set at 9/10 (normal mood, scores 0-9 vs. elevated depressions symptoms, scores 10 or more). | At baseline | |
Secondary | Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | To assess depressive symptoms by using the 21-item The cut-off point for depression is set at 9/10 (normal mood, scores 0-9 vs. elevated depressions symptoms, scores 10 or more). | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | The Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions (DN4) | A simple and objective tool, primarily designed to screen for neuropathic pain, differentiating between neuropathic and nociceptive pain conditions in clinical practice and research studies. In total, it contains 10 questions with a binary answer (no/yes). The total score, ranging from 0 to 10, is obtained by adding the number of affirmative answers, a total score > 4 out of 10 suggests neuropathic pain. | At baseline | |
Secondary | The Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions (DN4) | A simple and objective tool, primarily designed to screen for neuropathic pain, differentiating between neuropathic and nociceptive pain conditions in clinical practice and research studies. In total, it contains 10 questions with a binary answer (no/yes). The total score, ranging from 0 to 10, is obtained by adding the number of affirmative answers, a total score > 4 out of 10 suggests neuropathic pain. | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Quantitative sensory testing (QST) | The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament test kit will be used to evaluate sensory thresholds of the tips of the thumb, the index, and the middle fingers. The kit consists of 20 flexible nylon monofilaments of varying diameter and length to measure the level of skin touch sensation. The monofilaments have log numbers from 1.65 to 6.65 which begins with the light filaments (1.65-3.61) and progresses to heavy filaments of increasing diameter (3.84-6.65). Heavy filaments need increased pressure for touch to be recognized by patients. The tester applies each monofilament to the surface area of the skin with a perpendicular angle, then applies slight and steady pressure until the monofilament begins to bend, which is the end point of the test. The monofilament number 2.83 was defined as cut-off for normal sensation. | At baseline | |
Secondary | Quantitative sensory testing (QST) | The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament test kit will be used to evaluate sensory thresholds of the tips of the thumb, the index, and the middle fingers. The kit consists of 20 flexible nylon monofilaments of varying diameter and length to measure the level of skin touch sensation. The monofilaments have log numbers from 1.65 to 6.65 which begins with the light filaments (1.65-3.61) and progresses to heavy filaments of increasing diameter (3.84-6.65). Heavy filaments need increased pressure for touch to be recognized by patients. The tester applies each monofilament to the surface area of the skin with a perpendicular angle, then applies slight and steady pressure until the monofilament begins to bend, which is the end point of the test. The monofilament number 2.83 was defined as cut-off for normal sensation. | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Pain Pressure Test (PPT) with algometer | Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimal amount of pressure where a sense of pressure first changes to pain. An electronic algometer will be used to measure PPT levels. The algometer consists of a 1 cm2 rubber-tipped plunger mounted on a force transducer. The pressure is applied approximately at a rate of 30 kPa/s, with the algometer placed perpendicular to the application point. Participants will be instructed to press switch when the sensation changed from pressure to pain. The mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 s resting period will be allowed between each measure. | At baseline | |
Secondary | Pain Pressure Test (PPT) with algometer | Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimal amount of pressure where a sense of pressure first changes to pain. An electronic algometer will be used to measure PPT levels. The algometer consists of a 1 cm2 rubber-tipped plunger mounted on a force transducer. The pressure is applied approximately at a rate of 30 kPa/s, with the algometer placed perpendicular to the application point. Participants will be instructed to press switch when the sensation changed from pressure to pain. The mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 s resting period will be allowed between each measure. | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) | A CPM paradigm with the cold pressor test will be was used. Participants will submerge one foot into an insulated container filled with cold water with the medial malleolus ~3 cm below the water line. The foot contralateral to the affected hand (or most affected hand in case of bilateral CTS) will be submerged. Participants will rate the cold-induced foot pain on a numric pain rating scale (NPRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Immediately after maintaining the NPRS within the target score for 30 seconds, the test stimulus will be given. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) testing will be applied as a test stimulus. PPTs will be measured with a digital algometer. The participants will press a button as soon as the sensation of pressure changed to pain. PPT measurements will be taken on the thenar and hypothenar eminence of both hands, before cold water immersion and during cold water immersion. | At baseline | |
Secondary | Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) | A CPM paradigm with the cold pressor test will be was used. Participants will submerge one foot into an insulated container filled with cold water with the medial malleolus ~3 cm below the water line. The foot contralateral to the affected hand (or most affected hand in case of bilateral CTS) will be submerged. Participants will rate the cold-induced foot pain on a numric pain rating scale (NPRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Immediately after maintaining the NPRS within the target score for 30 seconds, the test stimulus will be given. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) testing will be applied as a test stimulus. PPTs will be measured with a digital algometer. The participants will press a button as soon as the sensation of pressure changed to pain. PPT measurements will be taken on the thenar and hypothenar eminence of both hands, before cold water immersion and during cold water immersion. | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Patient ratings of improvement, or worsening, of the pain condition | Patient's Clinical Global Impression of Change scale, subjects select one of seven options describing response to treatment, ranging from 1-7 where 1 indicates "very much improved" and 7 indicates "very much worse.". | At baseline | |
Secondary | Patient ratings of improvement, or worsening, of the pain condition | Patient's Clinical Global Impression of Change scale, subjects select one of seven options describing response to treatment, ranging from 1-7 where 1 indicates "very much improved" and 7 indicates "very much worse.". | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Quality of Life short-form-36 | To assess quality of Life, it consists of 36 items divided into eight domains range from reflecting predominantly physical well-being, that include physical function, the ability to perform expected physical roles, the degree of bodily pain and overall sense of general health to those reflecting predominantly social and emotional well-being that include overall sense of vitality, ability to function in social roles, ability to perform expected emotional and social roles and overall sense of mental health. Each item has 5 response choices, a high score (response choice 5) and a low score (response choice 1). | At baseline | |
Secondary | Quality of Life short-form-36 | To assess quality of Life, it consists of 36 items divided into eight domains range from reflecting predominantly physical well-being, that include physical function, the ability to perform expected physical roles, the degree of bodily pain and overall sense of general health to those reflecting predominantly social and emotional well-being that include overall sense of vitality, ability to function in social roles, ability to perform expected emotional and social roles and overall sense of mental health. Each item has 5 response choices, a high score (response choice 5) and a low score (response choice 1). | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Visual Analog Mood Scale | A self-assessment scale in which subjects rate their own emotions, including anxiety, depression, stress, and sleepiness along a 100 mm line. | At baseline | |
Secondary | Visual Analog Mood Scale | A self-assessment scale in which subjects rate their own emotions, including anxiety, depression, stress, and sleepiness along a 100 mm line. | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Mini Mental Status Exam | Cognition will be analyzed using Mini-Mental Status Examination, a brief screening of cognitive abilities. | At baseline | |
Secondary | Mini Mental Status Exam | Cognition will be analyzed using Mini-Mental Status Examination, a brief screening of cognitive abilities. | After 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Adverse Events Questionnaire | At each stimulation session and all follow-ups, participants will be administered a questionnaire to evaluate the potential adverse effects of stimulation on a 5-point scale from 0-4 (0 indicates no adverse events and 4 indicates extreme adverse effects. The main potential adverse effects include headache, neck and scalp pain, tingling, sleepiness, and acute mood change. | After 3 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05067205 -
Minimal Invasive Carpal Tunnel Release With the Novel Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03184688 -
Platelet Rich Plasma for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03582735 -
Preoperative Neuromobilization Exercises for Individuals With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05490420 -
Effects of Upper Extremity Manual Lymphatic Drainage on Symptom Severity, Hand Functions, Electrophysiological and Ultrasonographic Measurements in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05970692 -
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Turkish Version of Atroshi-Lyrén 6-item Symptoms Scale
|
||
Completed |
NCT04043780 -
Clinical Validation of a Decompression Prototype Splint for Patients With Carpal Tunel Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03880812 -
Cost Information on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment Decisions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06464809 -
Treatment Intervention of Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05328180 -
aDjunct bicarbonatE in Local anaesthesIa for CarpAl Tunnel rElease (DELICATE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05503719 -
An Absorbable Suture Versus a Non-absorbable Suture in Carpal Tunnel Release, a Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05372393 -
Carpal Tunnel Release Under Local Anaesthesia With or Without Distal Median Nerve Block
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05466162 -
Soft Tissue Massage Along With Mobilization Technique on Symptoms and Functional Status of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04060875 -
Research Protocol for Karuna Labs Inc.: Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Reality Graded Motor Imagery for Chronic Pain
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06294821 -
4AP to Delay Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR)
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04328805 -
Pain Reduction and Changes in Upper Limb Function Produced by an Ibuprofen Treatment in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02791529 -
Scalpel Versus Electrocautery for Surgical Skin Incision in Open Carpal Tunnel Release
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02141035 -
Acetyl-l-carnitine to Enhance Nerve Regeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01887145 -
Comparison of Long-term Outcomes Following Endoscopic or Open Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01897272 -
Post-Operative Splinting After Short-Incision Carpal Tunnel Release: a Prospective Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01394822 -
Neuromuscular Ultrasound for Focal Neuropathies
|
N/A |