Efficacy of Combined Ultrasound Guided Steroid Injection and Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Clinical Trial

Official title:

Efficacy of Combined Ultrasound Guided Steroid Injection and Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02708693
• Other study ID #: 2012-05-021A
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: January 5, 2016
• Last updated: March 9, 2016
• Start date: April 2013
• Est. completion date: June 2014

Study information

• Verified date: April 2013
• Source: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Taiwan: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound guided-steroid injection plus splinting to that of steroid injection alone using clinical and electrophysiological parameters in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Description:

This is a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled study. Patient with CTS were randomly assigned to group receiving ultrasound guided steroid injection and group receiving ultrasound guided corticosteroid injection and splinting. The steroid injection was using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine). The inclusion criteria included an age of more than 18 years and typical signs of CTS according to American Academy of Neurology criteria lasting for at least 3 months. The diagnosis of CTS was confirmed by electrophysiological tests.The exclusion criteria included the following: presence of thenar atrophy; existence of disorders such as hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, or rheumatoid arthritis; any accompanying orthopedic or neurologic disorders that could mimic CTS such as cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, proximal median nerve entrapment, or thoracic outlet syndrome; prior steroid injection into the affected carpal tunnel or carpal tunnel surgery; history of distal radius fracture; pregnancy or lactation; regular use of systemic NSAIDs or corticosteroids; and known allergy to corticosteroids and local anesthetics.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 52
• Est. completion date: June 2014
• Est. primary completion date: April 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. clinical diagnosis of CTS

2. The diagnosis of CTS was confirmed by electrophysiological tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. presence of thenar atrophy

2. existence of disorders such as hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, or rheumatoid arthritis; any accompanying orthopedic or neurologic disorders that could mimic CTS such as cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, proximal median nerve entrapment, or thoracic outlet syndrome

3. prior steroid injection into the affected carpal tunnel or carpal tunnel surgery

4. history of distal radius fracture

5. pregnancy or lactation

6. regular use of systemic NSAIDs or corticosteroids

7. known allergy to corticosteroids and local anesthetics.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
• Syndrome

Intervention

Drug:
• Triamcinolone Acetonide
ultrasound-guided injection using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort)

Device:
• thermoplastic wrist splint
thermoplastic wrist splint with wrist placed in a neutral position

Drug:
• lidocaine hydrochloride
ultrasound-guided injection using 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change from Baseline in the scores on the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BQ).	The BQ was interviewed-administered to assess the severity of symptoms and functional status.	at 2, 6, 12 weeks	Yes
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Median nerve distal motor latency	or the motor studies, the CMAPs were obtained via surface electrodes placed on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. The active recording electrode was placed on the muscle belly, and the reference electrode was placed on the tendon insertion. The median nerve was stimulated 8 cm proximal to the active recording electrode. Distal motor latencies were measured from the onset of stimulus artifact to the onset of the CMAP	at 2, 6, 12 weeks	No
Secondary	Change from Baseline in sensory nerve conduction velocity	SNAPs were obtained using an antidromic method and recorded by surface electrodes placed at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of the index finger for the median nerve and the same joints of the little finger for the ulnar nerve. The median nerves were stimulated at the wrist at a distance of 14 cm from the wrist to the active electrode. Distal sensory latencies were measured from the onset of the stimulus artifact to the onset of the SNAP. SNCV was calculated dividing the distance of 14 cm by the distal sensory latency.	at 2, 6, 12 weeks	No
Secondary	Change from Baseline in compound muscle action potential amplitude (CMAP)	the CMAPs were obtained via surface electrodes placed on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. The active recording electrode was placed on the muscle belly, and the reference electrode was placed on the tendon insertion. The median nerve was stimulated 8 cm proximal to the active recording electrode. The amplitude of CMAP were measured from baseline to negative peak.	at 2, 6, 12 weeks	No
Secondary	Change from Baseline in sensory nerve action potential amplitudes.	SNAPs were obtained using an antidromic method and recorded by surface electrodes placed at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of the index finger for the median nerve and the same joints of the little finger for the ulnar nerve. The median nerves were stimulated at the wrist at a distance of 14 cm from the wrist to the active electrode. The amplitude of SNAP were measured from baseline to negative peak.	at 2, 6, 12 weeks	No
Secondary	Change from Baseline in self-reported pain intensity	Patients were asked to indicate the intensity of their average level of pain for the wrist-hand region within the past 1 week, using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).	at 2, 6, 12 weeks	No
Secondary	change from Baseline in Cross sectional area	The CSA of the median nerve was measured using ultrasound at 2 levels: at the carpal tunnel inlet (CSA-I; immediately prior to the proximal margin of the flexor retinaculum) and in the mid-carpal tunnel (CSA-M; at the level of the pisiform bone and scaphoid tubercle). The CSA within the surrounding hyperechoic rim was measured. The CSA was measured using a continuous boundary trace of the nerve and was directly calculated using the area measurement software included with the ultrasonography device	at 2, 6, 12 weeks	No
Secondary	change from Baseline in flattening ratio	The flattening ratio was measured only at the mid-tunnel (FR-M) using ultrasound. FR was calculated by dividing the horizontal diameter of the nerve by the vertical diameter.	at 2, 6, 12 weeks	No