Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Clinical Trial

Official title:

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Carotid Arteries in Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05557032
• Other study ID #: 2021-GOKAE-0536
• Status: Completed
• Start date: December 25, 2021
• Est. completion date: September 16, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: September 2023
• Source: Izmir Katip Celebi University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

The final approach adopted in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) is to minimize the time between chest compressions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pulse and rhythm checks are recommended between chest compressions and it is stated that this period should not exceed 10 seconds. All guidelines also state that in cases of low cardiac output or low blood pressure, even if electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythms can be obtained, pulse checks may still fail and an arterial pulse may not be felt during chest compressions. This difficulty in sensing the arterial pulse causes delays in the decision of cardiac arrest in the patient. For this reason, there are cases of cardiac arrest in which the initiation of CPR is delayed or not started at all. The most common method for checking the pulse is manual palpation. However, since it is an operator-dependent method, it is affected by the experience of the healthcare personnel, the vital values of the patient, and anatomical differences. Therefore, more objective criteria are required to detect a pulse. A clinical study of the reliability of pulse checks showed that most healthcare professionals are unable to detect the presence or absence of a pulse. Another study showed that pulse alone is not sufficient to initiate CPR, and 50% of decisions to initiate CPR based on heart rate are incorrect. Therefore, more objective criteria have been sought to detect the presence of a pulse. For this purpose, evaluations were made regarding the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide, cardiac echo, and organized rhythm.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 536
• Est. completion date: September 16, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: September 15, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 100 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• All adult patients (over 18 years of age) with in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with traumatic arrest
• Conditions affecting carotid pulse palpation and/or USG application (patients with a history of carotid stenosis or dissection, patients undergoing neck surgery, patients with neck abscess hematoma)
• Pregnant arrest patients

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Intervention

Procedure:
• cardiopulmonary resuscitation
pulse checks during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Turkey	IKCU, Atatürk Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Acil Tip	Izmir

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Izmir Katip Celebi University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Carotid artery pulse control result using manual and USG in cardiopulmonary resuscitation	Our aim is to compare the USG and manual methods in evaluating the presence of a pulse during CPR and to determine which method gives the most appropriate time and accuracy.	2 minute