View clinical trials related to Carcinoma.
Filter by:The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of the neoadjuvant therapy, nivolumab with CF (5-FU, CDDP) or nivolumab with DCF (5-FU, CDDP, DTX), for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.
This phase II trial studies how well cabozantinib, nivolumab, and ipilimumab work in treating patients with differentiated thyroid cancer that does not respond to radioactive iodine and that worsened after treatment with a drug targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), a protein needed to form blood vessels. Cabozantinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab and ipilimumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving cabozantinib, nivolumab and ipilimumab may work better than the usual approach consisting of chemotherapy with drugs such as doxorubicin, sorafenib, and lenvatinib for this type of thyroid cancer.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of Abemaciclib and Sunitinib administered orally in patients with advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This study consists of two parts: Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion. During the dose escalation phase, participants will be sequentially enrolled in a standard 3 x 3 dose escalation study design to receive oral Abemaciclib in Combination with Sunitinib. The purpose of this dose escalation is to determine the maximal tolerated dose based on assessment of any dose limiting toxicity. The Dose Expansion Phase will enroll additional participants at the established maximal tolerated dose to further evaluate safety, tolerability, as well as the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this combination drug regimen.
The aim of the study is to determine if intervening with combined local therapy and chemotherapy prior to chemotherapy alone in patients with oligorecurrent and oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma led to significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS).
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical decisions of Watson artificial intelligence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) in combination with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in the treatment of cisplatin-ineligible participants with a Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10, or in participants ineligible for any platinum-containing chemotherapy regardless of CPS, with advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). The primary hypotheses for this study are that: 1. Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib is superior to pembrolizumab + placebo with respect to Progression-free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR), and 2. Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib is superior to pembrolizumab + placebo with respect to Overall Survival (OS). With Amendment 3 (effective: September [Sep]-24-2021) participants discontinued lenvatinib and placebo; participants who remained on treatment in the study arms received open-label pembrolizumab. With Amendment 3 the external Data Monitoring Committee was discontinued. With Amendment 4 (effective: December-5-2022) Second Course will no longer be offered. Any participant receiving Second Course treatment prior to initiation of Amendment 4 will be able to complete treatment as planned. With Amendment 4 study participation will end after the final administration of pembrolizumab. Participants who either complete 35 administrations of pembrolizumab or discontinue pembrolizumab will discontinue from the study following the safety follow-up visit. AEs and spontaneously reported pregnancies will be reported and followed per protocol. All participants in efficacy follow-up prior to initiation of Amendment 4 will stop efficacy assessments and be discontinued from the study. All participants in survival follow-up prior to initiation of Amendment 4 are considered to have completed the study and should have a final survival contact. The overall study ends when the last participant completes the last study-related contact or visit, withdraws from the study, or is lost to follow-up.
This study is to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and schedule of CX-4945 when administered orally twice daily for 28 consecutive days, in a 4-week (28 days) cycle, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The safety and tolerability of CX-4945, preliminary evidence of antitumor effect, and the effect of CX-4945 treatment on the Hh signaling pathway will also be evaluated in this study.
This trial aims to improve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor responses in patients undergoing Y90 radioembolization by using personalized dosimetry as part of treatment planning. Using standard calculations for Y90 doses may not be specific enough for individual patients given that there can be differences in how tumor cells and liver cells respond to radiation. Personalized dose plans may help improve treatment and outcomes in liver cancer.
This phase II trial studies how well berzosertib (M6620) works when given in combination with topotecan hydrochloride (topotecan) compared with topotecan alone in treating patients with small cell lung cancer that has come back (relapsed), or small cell cancer that arises from a site other than the lung (extrapulmonary). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as topotecan hydrochloride, work by damaging the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) in tumor cells, causing those cells to die and the tumor to shrink. However, some tumor cells can become less affected by chemotherapy because they have ways to repair the damaged DNA. The addition of M6620 could help topotecan hydrochloride shrink the cancer and prevent it from returning by blocking enzymes needed for DNA repair.
This is a phase I/Ib, open label study. The escalation portion will characterize the safety and tolerability of DKY709 and DKY709 in combination with PDR001 in subjects with NSCLC or melanoma who have received prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, or subjects with NPC. After the determination of the MTD/RD for a particular treatment arm, dose expansion will further assess safety, tolerability, PK/PD, and anti-tumor activity of each regimen at the MTD/RD.