View clinical trials related to Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.
Filter by:It is an exploratory clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Camrelizumab in the treatment of patients with BCLC stage B and C HCC.Treatment will continue until disease progression or intolerable toxicity or patients withdrawal of consent,and the target sample size is 60 individuals.
This study used (cTACE or DEB-TACE + FOLFOX scheme HAIC) combined with PD-1 antibody camrelizumab and apatinib mesylas in the treatment of patients with advanced liver cancer, to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combined treatment for clinical liver cancer treatment.It will provide new evidence-based medical evidence.This study is a prospective, open, single center, exploratory clinical study and the sample size is 56.Main research purpose:To evaluate the effectiveness of cTACE or DEB-TACE + FOLFOX regimen HAIC combined with camrelizumab and apatinib mesylas in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Secondary research purpose:To evaluate the safety of cTACE or DEB-TACE + FOLFOX regimen HAIC combined with camrelizumab and apatinib mesylas in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
This is a randomized, two arm, phase II study of 1st Cycle dose optimization for regorafenib treatment compared to standard dose of regorafenib treatment in HCC patients for whom the physician is intending to treat with regorafenib and who failed any 1st line systemic treatment.
This is a phase 2 single-arm, open-label clinical trial determining efficacy of cabozantinib in combination with ipilimumab/nivolumab and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in subjects with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). These are subjects who are not candidates for curative intent treatment.
The investigators intend to perform RFA therapy on HCC less than 4 cm in size using octopus electrode, double alternating unipolar high-frequency transmission mode and gradual high-frequency energy loading mode, and to find out the therapeutic results. The primary evaluation variable is the ideal technical success rate for securing a safety margin of 5 mm or more around the tumor on the CT obtained immediately after the procedure, and the secondary evaluation variable is the volume of the cauterization lesion per unit time measured on the CT obtained immediately after the procedure, The local tumor recurrence rate, survival rate and disease-free survival rate of 12 months after the procedure, the presence or absence of multiple recurrences within the same segment, the actual procedure time, and the incidence of complications associated with the procedure are examined. The performance of RFA therapy of HCC using the Octopus electrode and gradual high-frequency energy transfer mode is compared with that of the existing Octopus electrode and RFA therapy using the basic maximum high-frequency energy transfer mode using historic cohort.
This study is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of HLX10 + HLX04 vs Sorafenibas as the First-line Treatment in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC Eligible subjects in this study will be randomized to Arm A or Arm B at 2:1 ratio as follows: Arm A (treatment group): HLX10 + HLX04 Arm B (control group): sorafenib Randomization is stratified by: region (Asia (excluding Japan) vs. others), HBV infection vs. HCV infection vs. no HBV or HCV infection, portal vein invasion or/and extrahepatic spread (with vs.without), and ECOG (0 vs. 1).
Objectives: To develop and validate a predictive model, applicable to daily practice, of liver complications emergence in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients and advanced fibrosis, who have achieved sustained viral response (SVR) with direct-acting antivirals (DAA)-based therapy. Methods: Design: Mulsite prospective multicenter cohort study. Study subjects: HCV-monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals recruited from two parallel cohorts (GEHEP-MONO Cohort clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02333292(HEPAVIR-DAA Cohort clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02057003). These cohorts enrolled patients with HCV infection, treated with DAA-based regimens after October 2011, at the units of infectious diseases of 18 hospitals throughout Spain. Patients who fullfilled the following inclusion criteria are included in this study: 1) Have received a regimen with one or more DAA; 2) Have achieved SVR 12 weeks after treatment; 3) Have an evaluable liver stiffness (LS) of more than 9.5 kPa in the three months prior to the start of treatment. Follow-up: The baseline time point is the date of SVR. All participants are evaluated by a common protocol every six months. At every visit, clinical and laboratory examination focusing on the early detection of liver complications are carried out. LS is assessed by vibration-controlled transient elastography, according to a standardized procedure, every 12 months. In patients with cirrhosis, liver ultrasound and plasma alpha-fetoprotein determination are conducted for hepatocellular carcinoma screening, every six months. Variables and data analysis: The primary outcome variable of the study will be the emergence of liver complication (hepatic decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma) or liver transplant. Predictive models will be develop with clinical, analytical, and genetic variables independently associated with the primary variable in a Cox regression for competitive risks applied to a developmental subpopulation. The performance of the model will be evaluated using COR curves. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values will be calculated, both in the developmental population and in a validation population.
This study will enroll patients with hepatocellular carcinoma being planned for TACE or other standard of care treatment and obtain blood samples pre and post TACE for biomarker identification using bead based X-aptamer library. No intervention is planned.
All international guidelines recommend 6-monthly ultrasound surveillance for patients at risk for liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma or HCC), such as patients with cirrhosis. The aim of surveillance is to detect HCC at an early stage when it is still potentially curable. Currently only 4 out of 10 HCCs are detected at the early stage. Ultrasound surveillance for HCC has a wide ranging sensitivity, dependent on many factors such as operator experience, patient body habitus and liver parenchymal heterogeneity due to chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. In a select group of patients, surveillance ultrasound can be suboptimal or near non-diagnostic. Currently no guideline offers an alternative surveillance tool for patients who have suboptimal surveillance ultrasounds.
This is an prospective, interventional, non-randomized multicenter phase II study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Cabozantinib as a second-line therapy (after one prior systemic therapy) in patients with intermediate to advanced HCC (BCLC B/C) and concomitant impaired liver function CP score B7-8. Subjects who meet all study eligibility criteria will receive Cabozantinib 40 mg daily orally. Subjects will receive Cabozantinib as long as they continue to experience clinical benefit in the opinion of the Investigator or until there is unacceptable toxicity or the need for subsequent systemic anti-cancer treatment or liver directed local anti-cancer therapy. Treatment may continue in this fashion after radiographic progression as long as the Investigator believes that the subject is still receiving clinical benefit from Cabozantinib and that the potential benefit of continuing Cabozantinib outweighs potential risk. In addition, all subjects will be treated with best supportive care. This excludes systemic anti-cancer therapy and liver-directed local anti-cancer therapy.