View clinical trials related to Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.
Filter by:The investigators are trying to learn more about the personal perceptions and experiences regarding the needs of patients with liver cancer to help improve the care of all patients. The investigators would like to know whether there are needs that patients have or are aware of, especially those needs that the investigators have not been able to address. The investigators aim to develop a program that helps participants and participant's families to navigate the process of being diagnosed with liver cancer and receiving treatment.
The prognosis of liver transplanted (LT) patients with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially those with progression after locoregional treatment or advanced HCC, remains poor. Current treatment modalities involve tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) characterized by a low response rate and often poor tolerability. Encouraging findings from the Imbrave 150 study, demonstrating increased survival rates coupled with favorable treatment tolerance, prompt the investigators to consider the potential of offering the combination of treatment with Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab (Atezo-Beva) to patients with LT. No data regarding the safety and efficacy of this new combination are available for patients with LT as they were not included in Imbrave 150. Immunosuppression after LT is low when compared to essentially all other organ recipients, liver recipients are considered with lower immunological risk. However, the use of ICIs has been associated with a risk of hepatic rejection in LT patients. In this study, in order to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR) occurrence, we propose to adopt a standardized immunosuppressive regimen closed to the one used immediately after LT but with lower therapeutic goals for tacrolimus and everolimus to allow immunotherapy treatment to be effective. The better tolerance of liver grafts will probably lead to less risk of rejection with Atezo-Beva than in other organ transplants.
This prospective, single-arm study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human adenovirus type 5 injection combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The recombinant human adenovirus type 5 was administered intratumorally on day 1 and 5 in cycle 1 and cycle 2. Lenvatinib was administered orally once daily started on day 1 of cycle 1 .Tislelizumab was administered intravenously every 3 week started on day 1 of cycle 3. The patient accepted the therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred or meet the end point of the study. The primary end point was ORR assessed by investigator using RECIST v1.1 .
The aim of these study to determine the prevalence of hepatitis Delta virus (HDV) infections and the prognosis of HDV patients in Turkey's southeast. The investigators intend to arrange training sessions for 250 family physicians in Diyarbakir, Batman, Mardin, and Sanliurfa in order to determine those goals. The investigators will talk about diagnosing hepatitis B virus (HBV), HDV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections during these events. To ensure that patients with simultaneous HDV infection are evaluated for HIV/HCV and to detect liver fibrosis with a non-invasive method.
For early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, i.e. Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer Stage 0, ablation is the standard treatment with a comparable prognosis and less risk of ablation compared with liver resection. However, ablation is demanding on the surgeon and patients often face early recurrence if ablation is not complete. Therefore, it is necessary to find reasonable adjuvant treatment to consolidate the effect of microwave therapy.
Hepatocellular carcinoma is prone to invade the portal vein and form portal vein thrombosis, and patients in this period are directly included in the advanced stages, i.e. Barcelona clinical liver cancer stage C. For the treatment of PVTT, there are differences between Eastern and Western guidelines, with systemic drugs being the standard of care in Western countries, while surgical treatment is often actively practiced in the Asia-Pacific region. More research is needed to explore the differences between these two approaches.
Patients with ruptured liver cancer and bleeding after surgical resection were included according to the criteria of admission, and the patients were divided into experimental and control groups. the primary efficacy end point was RFS, and the secondary end point was the rate of abdominal implant metastases and OS.To analyze the efficacy of HIPEC.
Clinically significant portal hypertension limits the therapeutic options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is closely associated with patient prognosis. HCC patients with CPSH are heterogeneous and treatment allocation remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the survival benefits of liver resection (LR) and transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) in these populations.
Hepatic dysfunction limits the therapeutic options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is closely associated with patient prognosis. Established practice guidelines for patients with HCC and impaired liver function are lacking. The treatment allocation in these populations is heterogeneous and remains controversial. This study compared the survival benefits of liver resection (LR) and transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) in patients with HCC and impaired liver function.
SBRT, atezolizumab, and bevacizumab have different mechanisms of action and can potentially have synergistic effects when combined. SBRT delivers targeted radiation to the tumor, while atezolizumab enhances the immune response, and bevacizumab inhibits angiogenesis. The combination of SBRT with atezolizumab and bevacizumab will result in improved tumor response rates as compared to atezolizumab and bevacizumab alone in patients with advance unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Up until now, no study has been done that has compared SBRT with atezolizumab, and bevacizumab in unresectable advance hepatocellular carcinoma. With this study, investigator aim to study to compare the efficacy and safety of SBRT combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab alone in the treatment of unresectable advance hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).