Cancer of Prostate Clinical Trial
— FOC/DYNOfficial title:
Evaluation of a Dynamic Focusing Ultrasonic Transducer for High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment of Localized Prostate Adenocarcinoma - Dose Escalation Trial to Define the Best Acoustic Parameters
Verified date | August 2018 |
Source | EDAP TMS S.A. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Define the best acoustic parameters for the dynamic focusing HIFU transducer in the treatment of localized Prostate Cancer.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 180 |
Est. completion date | December 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 70 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria for primary care patients: - Age > 70 years - T1 or T2 - PSA < 15 ng/mL - 12 randomized biopsies - Gleason score = 3+4 - Normal anal and rectal anatomy - American Society of Anesthesiologists risk (ASA) 1 or 2 Exclusion Criteria for primary care patients: - T3 patients - American Society of Anesthesiologists risk (ASA) 3 - Metastatic disease (Bone scan…) - Previous prostate cancer therapy - Distance between rectal mucosa and prostatic capsule of more than 8 mm thickness - Prostate volume over 50cc - Previous bladder cancer - contraindication to MRI - previous rectal or urinary fistulae Inclusion Criteria for salvage patients: - Age > 50 years - T1 or T2 - Biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy (Phoenix definition: nadir+2ng/ml) - 12 randomized biopsies - Normal anal and rectal anatomy - ASA 1 or 2 Exclusion Criteria for salvage patients: - T3 patients - ASA 3 - Metastatic disease (Bone scan…) - Distance between rectal mucosa and prostatic capsule of more than 8 mm thickness - Prostate volume over 50cc - Previous bladder cancer - contraindication to MRI - previous rectal or urinary fistulae |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Edouard Herriot Hospital | Lyon |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
EDAP TMS S.A. |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Necrosis measurement (immediate efficacy) | The coagulation necrosis induced by the HIFU dynamic focusing treatment of the prostate is evaluated by MRI in the first week post treatment. | Day 7 | |
Secondary | Histological marker measurement (mid term efficacy) | The mid term efficacy is evaluated by the rate of negative biopsy at 6 months. | 6 months | |
Secondary | Biochemical marker measurement (mid term efficacy) | The mid term efficacy is evaluated by the percentage of patient with a PSA nadir = 0.3ng/mL | 6 months | |
Secondary | Rectal wall preservation (immediate safety and morbidity) | Evaluate the rectal wall preservation by MRI in the first week post treatment. | Day 7 | |
Secondary | Adverse events reporting rates (safety and the morbidity) at 6 months | Adverse Events reporting | 6 months | |
Secondary | Adverse events reporting rates (safety and the morbidity) at 24 months | Adverse Events reporting | 24 months | |
Secondary | Quality of life score | Quality of life will be assessed using the QLQC30 (Quality of Life questionnaire) questionnaire. It is a specific questionnaire to determine the quality of life a patient with cancer. It is composed of 30 questions with 4 potential answers going from: not at all, a little, enough or a lot, within 28 questions and with a visual scale going from 1 to 7 (7 being excellent and 1 being very bad) for the last 2 questions. The raw score is established by adding the score of each question and a linear transformation range it from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the worse the quality of life. |
3 months | |
Secondary | Quality of life score | Quality of life will be assessed using the QLQC30 (Quality of Life questionnaire) questionnaire. It is a specific questionnaire to determine the quality of life a patient with cancer. It is composed of 30 questions with 4 potential answers going from: not at all, a little, enough or a lot, within 28 questions and with a visual scale going from 1 to 7 (7 being excellent and 1 being very bad) for the last 2 questions. The raw score is established by adding the score of each question and a linear transformation range it from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the worse the quality of life. |
6 months | |
Secondary | IPSS score | Urinary function will be assessed using the IPSS (International Prostate Score Symptom) questionnaire. The IPSS questionnaire is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the patient to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35. The score is then categorized as follow: Mild (symptoms score less than or equal to 7), Moderate (symptom score range 8-19), Severe (symptom score range 20-35). The higher the score, the worse the symptoms. |
3 months | |
Secondary | IPSS score | Urinary function will be assessed using the IPSS (International Prostate Score Symptom) questionnaire. The IPSS questionnaire is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the patient to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35. The score is then categorized as follow: Mild (symptoms score less than or equal to 7), Moderate (symptom score range 8-19), Severe (symptom score range 20-35). The higher the score, the worse the symptoms. |
6 months | |
Secondary | IIEF-5 score | Sexual function will be assessed using the IIEF-5 (The International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire. The IIEF-5 Questionnaire is composed of 5 items with 5 possible answers rating from 1 to 5 (very low, low, moderate, high, very high). The score is the sum of the ordinal responses to the 56 items. It is then categorized as follow: 22-25: No erectile dysfunction, 17-21: Mild erectile dysfunction, 12-16: Mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, 8-11: Moderate erectile dysfunction, 5-7: Severe erectile dysfunction. The higher the score, the better the sexual function. |
3 months | |
Secondary | IIEF-5 score | Sexual function will be assessed using the IIEF-5 (The International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire. The IIEF-5 Questionnaire is composed of 5 items with 5 possible answers rating from 1 to 5 (very low, low, moderate, high, very high). The score is the sum of the ordinal responses to the 56 items. It is then categorized as follow: 22-25: No erectile dysfunction, 17-21: Mild erectile dysfunction, 12-16: Mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, 8-11: Moderate erectile dysfunction, 5-7: Severe erectile dysfunction. The higher the score, the better the sexual function. |
6 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT05191017 -
Study of NUV-422 in Combination With Enzalutamide in Patients With mCRPC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00970203 -
Dendritic Cell (DC)-Based Vaccines Loaded With Allogeneic Prostate Cell Lines in Combination With Androgen Ablation in Patients With Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03031418 -
Clinical Evaluation of the 'ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore' (EPI)
|
||
Completed |
NCT01639859 -
Assessment of Supersonic Imagine Aixplorer for the Detection and Localisation of Prostate Cancer Foci
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06406803 -
The Impact of Physical Activity Versus Dietary Energy Restriction on Tumour and Muscle Protein Synthesis in Prostate Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02362464 -
Long-Term TARP Vaccination Using a Multi-Epitope TARP Peptide Autologous Dendritic Cell Vaccination in Previously Vaccinated Men on NCI 09-C-0139
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05844761 -
Real-time Motion Management During Prostate and Lung Radiotherapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03442075 -
Pain Comparison Whit Visual Analog Scale (EVA) Between Four Analgesic Methods During Trans Rectal Prostatic Biopsy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05252390 -
NUV-868 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Olaparib or Enzalutamide in Adult Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03896958 -
The PIONEER Initiative: Precision Insights On N-of-1 Ex Vivo Effectiveness Research Based on Individual Tumor Ownership (Precision Oncology)
|
||
Completed |
NCT03444532 -
Feasibility Study Testing a Sleep Intervention in Prostate Cancer Patients With Insomnia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600400 -
Improving Sexual Quality of Life - Randomized Trial of Two vs Five MRI Guided SABR Treatments for Prostate Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04887935 -
Neoadjuvant SGLT2 Inhibition in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02235142 -
Prostatic Cancer Versus Androgen Deficiency
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06318559 -
Artificial Intelligence 3D Augmented Reality Robot-Assisted-Radical- Prostatectomy v.s. no3D Intervention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01477749 -
Sipuleucel-T Manufacturing Demonstration Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04319783 -
Darolutamide + Consolidation Radiotherapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer Detected by PSMA
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04258813 -
Onco-primary Care Networking to Support TEAM-based Care
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05361798 -
T-Cell Clonality After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Alone and in Combination With the Immunocytokine M9241 in Localized High- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Androgen Deprivation Therapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04304196 -
Tailored, wEb-based, Psychosocial and Physical Activity Self-Management PrOgramme
|
N/A |