View clinical trials related to Breast Reconstruction.
Filter by:Mastectomy in breast cancer is still a way of treatment. Nowadays, the goal is to improve reconstruction's technicals. Immediate Breast Reconstruction (IBR) is one of them, largely used in United States but less in France. However, IGR (Insitut Gustave Roussey) in Paris just wrote a new protocole wich allows more IBR by including more patients. This study aims to compare complications in 2 groups: mastectomies followed by IBR and mastectomies without IBR. The second goal will try to estimate the proportion of eligible's patients to IBR, and to analyse their surgicals and oncologicals risk factors
Pain management is a major concern in oncologic breast surgery and reconstruction. Significant risks for acute and chronic pain after surgery might be reduced through improved pain control pre-operatively. Addition of regional anesthesia to a multimodal peri-operative pain management protocol offers a promising solution for improved recovery. For patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction, this RCT compares TPVB+Pecs local anesthetic block with TPVB local anesthetic block and Pecs placebo normal saline block for their effect on acute pain, chronic pain, opioid consumption, opioid-related side effects, patient-reported quality of recovery after surgery, and length of stay.
The study aimed to assess the impact of the use of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) after immediate breast reconstruction on the number of surgical-site complications, skin surface temperature, objective elastic and viscoelastic and subjective scar's quality to determine risk factors that could be considered as indications for prophylactic ciNPWT application.
This study is designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of patient performed tissue expansions in two-stage alloplastic breast reconstruction with tissue expanders. The investigators hypothesize that a motivated patient who learns and demonstrates proper technique can safely perform tissue expansions at home, with no increase in complications or problems with reconstruction. 30 participants will be recruited for this study, 10 into a Home Expansion Group, and 20 into a Control Group.
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a useful tool in pain management after abdominal surgery. It is a regional nerve block that targets T6-L1 thoracolumbar nerves running in the plane between internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle. It is shown to help with post-operative pain management, reducing pain scores and narcotic pain medication use, as well as promoting earlier return to activity and recovery. TAP block became a very popular, safe, and effective therapeutic adjunct for many different abdominal surgeries ranging from obstetric procedures to general surgery procedures like colorectal surgery. Furthermore, it is used in plastic surgery procedures such as Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) free flap or Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, as they involve extensive amount of abdominal soft tissue incision. Previous studies have shown that TAP block in these procedures significantly reduce post-op pain and narcotic pain medication use. More recently, Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) has risen to spotlight for providing a longer, sustained local anesthesia. Various surgical disciplines have adopted this agent as part of their pain management protocol. However, there are no literatures that describe the effect of TAP block using Exparel for breast free flap population. The study hypothesize that delivering TAP block with Exparel (vs. plain bupivacaine) will provide longer regional blocking effect, hence aiding in pain control and recovery postoperatively. The investigators will be analyzing postop narcotic pain medication requirement and pain scores to look into this question.
The purpose of this study is to compare two standard techniques for breast reconstruction-the prepectoral technique and the subpectoral technique. Again, the prepectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle, while the subpectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle. The standard approach used at MSK is the subpectoral technique. This study will help researchers find out whether the subpectoral approach is better, the same as, or worse than the prepectoral approach. To decide which approach is better, the researchers will look at which technique causes fewer complications after surgery (for example, infection or the need for a second surgery). Researchers are also interested in seeing which approach causes less pain and use of pain medication after surgery.
Since polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) was used in cosmetic surgery in 1997, about 30 million women have received PAAG injection for breast augmentation. Although the use of PAAG has been prohibited in most countries due to its myriad complications, a large number of symptomatic patients and asymptomatic patients have continued to seek medical advice. The strategy of repairing secondary breast deformities after PAAG removal has increasingly become a concern for both doctors and patients, but there is no standardized algorithm yet. The purpose of the present study was to perform a retrospective study to compare the safety and effectiveness of different reconstruction timing and method after removing the gel.
Breast cancer is one of the main malignant tumors threatening women's lives. In recent years, the increasing demand for reconstruction of breast cancer patients in China has made the proportion of breast reconstruction increase year by year, while implant reconstruction has become the most important way of breast reconstruction due to its less injury, shorter time of operation and relatively simple surgical technique. In the long-term clinical practice, due to the lack of safe and effective alternative methods, the reconstruction method with prosthesis placed to posterior pectoralis major has been accepted by surgeons and patients, and has become the most commonly used method of prosthesis construction. However, the development of biomaterials provides new ideas for breast reconstruction. At present, more and more doctors in clinical practice discontinue the use of serratus anterior, but use the synthetic mesh (mostly titanium mesh TiLoop® Bra) or allogeneic acellular dermal matrix mesh to cover part of the dilator or prosthesis so as to shorten the entire operation cycle and make the appearance of the reconstructed breast more natural and aesthetic. In particular, it can improve the contour of the folds under the breast and shape the breasts with a certain degree of sagging. This study takes the patients receiving immediate reconstruction with an implant combined with TiLoop® Bra after total mastectomy as the subjects, aiming to compare the aesthetics and safety of the placement of implant to anterior and posterior pectoralis major through a prospective and randomized study. The primary objective of the study is to analyze the aesthetics of breast appearance, patient satisfaction and postoperative quality of life (QOL) of the placement of implant to anterior and posterior pectoralis major. The secondary objective of the study is to analyze the incidence of complications and type of reoperation in both groups.
This study is a randomized single blinded prospective clinical trial comparing the surgical outcomes of four different acellular dermal matrixes (ADMs) after primary breast reconstruction. ADMs are used in conjunction with tissue expanders or breast implants to reinforce the recreated breast pocket. Currently, 4 different ADMS are commercially available: AlloDerm, DermaCell, Allomax and Flex HD. It is unclear which ADM is clinically superior. The objective of the study is to compare the complications and post-op care of 4 different ADMs within a 2 year follow up to elucidate their surgical outcomes.
This study compares outcomes of prospective mesh-based breast reconstructions to historical control breast reconstructions with no mesh.