Estimating Highest Capacity Performance During Evaluation of Walking for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury

Brain Injuries, Traumatic Clinical Trial

Official title: Estimating Highest Capacity Performance During Evaluation of Walking for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to trauma and/or neurologic disease is a leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. The loss of balance for people with a traumatic brain injury can have a large effect on their walking abilities and this can come with a number of challenges. There is a greater risk of falling after being discharged from the hospital. In addition, people are more likely to become sedentary after TBI, which leads to the loss of muscle strength.

To help provide the best care, clinicians need accurate measurements when people begin their therapy, as well as throughout to ensure they are making appropriate progress. The tests currently used by clinicians may not provide the most accurate measurements that show what a person is capable of physically doing. The study you are being asked to participate in aims to provide more accurate measurements by using a robotic treadmill device and by assessing motivating factors that are important to you. The treadmill device will allow us to more accurately test your walking ability in a safe, fall-free environment.

Clinical Trial Description

Traumatic brain injury due to trauma and/or neurologic disease is a leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. Balance impairments observed within the post-TBI population can greatly impact walking abilities and pose a variety of challenges. Following hospital discharge, there is a greater fall risk as well as a decrease in physical activity and increase in sedentary behaviors that lead to deconditioning.

It is difficult to determine the extent of what a person is capable of doing using current overground assessment methods, which are the current standard means of physical capability measurements (i.e. 6-minute walk test, 5 times sit-to-stand, 10-meter walk test). Improvement of walking and balance outcomes in this population requires the re-evaluation of current approaches and the testing/implementation of new approaches. This will allow more appropriate assessment of baseline walking abilities in order to apply the appropriate amount of challenge during rehabilitation training. This study will involve the use of a robotic treadmill device in order to determine maximum walking capacities of participants and compare these capacities to standard overground assessments. It has been shown that walking speeds overground are correlated with walking speeds on a robotic device (and even specifically on the KineAssist-MX, which will be used for this project). If it is found that maximum capacities be greater on the robotic device, rehabilitation training goals can be more appropriately tailored to these participants.

The aims and hypotheses of this research project are:

Aim 1) Assess function at preferred performance in an overground environment vs. a safety-enhanced robotic environment to establish concurrent validity.

Hypothesis 1) Participants with the highest overground performances (strength, speed, and endurance) will have the highest performances on the KineAssist-MX and vice versa.

Aim 2) Assess maximum capacities of participants over ground vs. in the safety-enhanced robotic environment to establish content validity.

Hypothesis 2) Maximum capacity will be higher in the safety-enhanced robotic environment than overground and vice versa. Therefore, people will be able to do more in the robotic environment than overground.

Aim 3) Assess the capacities of individuals across different baseline functional strata to establish usability.

Hypothesis 3) Individuals in the lower quadrants of baseline function will have lower maximum capacities in the safety-enhanced robotic environment.

This study will occur over a two-day period of time during which participants will undergo overground assessments during day 1 and robotic safety-environment assessments during day 2. There will be no interventions implemented. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Brain Injuries
• Brain Injuries, Traumatic
• Wounds and Injuries

• NCT number: NCT05057377
• Study type: Observational
• Source: The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
• Status: Completed
• Start date: September 22, 2021
• Completion date: August 31, 2022