View clinical trials related to Bowel Preparation.
Filter by:This study aimed to provide a recipe resource with visuals in line with the low-residue diet recommendations given to patients before colonoscopy, including cooking instructions for the meals in the diet list. In this way, we aimed to minimize confusion regarding dietary restrictions during colonoscopy preparation and ensure full compliance with the diet list. Our hypothesis is that this approach may enhance compliance with current recommendations and improve the quality of bowel preparation.
220 patients are allocated randomly to the morning group (am group) or the afternoon group (pm group) and assessed by quality of bowel preparation and residual volume gastric residue.
This is a prospective randomized study compared with active control arm. The investigators compare the colon cleansing in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Colonoscopy is the gold standard in bowel assessment when there is suspicion of colon and rectum pathology. Bowel cleansing is necessary to ensure an optimal visualization of colonic mucosa, allowing this form of detection and removal of polyps. Nowadays international recommendations have multiple bowel preparations. There are differences among them regarding adherence, tolerance and adverse effects. Lactulose (LAC) is widely used in treating constipation. However, there are some randomized clinical assays using LAC as bowel preparation with excellent results according to bowel preparation and tolerance scales. Adherence to bowel preparation significantly affects the result in the endoscopic study. Safety of polyethylene glycol (PEG) formulations has been validated in several studies, it presents little severe side effects and the advantage of its applicability to patients with several comorbidities (heart, liver and kidney without water deprivation). However, its main disadvantage lies in the need to ingest large amounts of liquid (3-4L), generating intolerance thereto in 15%-45% of patients. Bowel cleansing preparation with PEG is widely used in clinical practice. Considering that according to international studies reporting better tolerance and adherence with LAC; it is suggested to compare the level of bowel preparation, tolerance and adherence between two groups with LAC and PEG.
This is a prospective randomized study compared with active control arm.
The high energy nutritional supplement Resource® Energy is approved for human nutritional support in various clinical conditions, yet it has been used off-label to alleviate the effects of hunger during bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Its impact in mucosa visualization quality and hunger alleviation is unknown. The product is liquid and nutritious but it is not transparent, thus it is conceivable that it could alleviate the discomfort of hunger during the preparation but possibly compromising mucosa visualization. In this study, participants who will undergo a colonoscopy (requested for an explicit medical indication) will take two bottles of the nutritional supplement during the usual bowel preparation. The quality of mucosal visualization and the participants opinion regarding satiety and product tolerance during bowel preparation will then be analysed.
Several factors are considered as the key indicators of quality colonoscopy, including endoscopist experience, withdrawal time, and quality of bowel preparation (BP). A number of laxatives are currently used as BP, and these are mainly based on PEG agents that differ for the volume and the addition of adjuvants. Several trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of low volume 2L-PEG based regimens compared with high volume PEG regimens and non-PEG agents. However, for low-volume 1L-PEG plus ascorbate (1L-PEG-Asc) only the data from registration trials are available, and none of these have been performed in an "open access" colonoscopy booking system. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of 1L-PEG-Asc compared to 2L-PEG plus ascorbate (2L-PEG-Asc) in an "open access" booking system.
Adequate bowel preparation is critical for successful colonoscopy and a large volume of PEG was required for bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. The investigators conducted a a prospective, randomized, controlled study to compare low dose of oral magnesium sulfate solution with high dose PEG. The investigators found that patients who took low dose of oral magnesium sulfate solution had similar bowel preparation quality to patients who took PEG,but accompanied with fewer adverse events and better tolerance.
The diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy depends on the quality of bowel preparation, which is a critical element associated with the diagnostic yield, difficulty, time required, and the completeness of colonoscopy. The non-digestive physicians seemed to have a lower quality of bowel preparation compare to the digestive physicians. Therefore, investigators planned to evaluate the risk factors for suboptimal intestinal preparation in outpatients from the perspective of digestive doctors and non-digestive.
The diagnostic accuracy and safety of colonoscopy highly depends on the quality of the pre-procedural bowel preparation. A past history of poor bowel preparation is the most important risk factor of inadequate bowel cleansing at the next colonoscopy. This study aims to evaluate if an adequate level of bowel cleansing can be achieved with the Pure-Vu System in patients with previous poor bowel preparation, in a single arm international multicenter feasibility study.