Body Weight Clinical Trial
— COMpLExOfficial title:
The Relationship Between COntrast Media Volume and Tube voLtage in Computed Tomography of the Liver, for Optimal Enhancement Based on Total Body Weight: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [COMpLEx Trial]
Verified date | February 2020 |
Source | Maastricht University Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Computed Tomography (CT) is widely used in abdominal imaging for a variety of indications.
Contrast media (CM) is used to enhance vascular structures and organ parenchyma. Attenuation
of the liver makes it possible to recognize hypo- and hypervascular lesions, which are often
invisible on unenhanced CT images. Lesions can only be detected in case they are large enough
and the contrast with the background is high enough. Heiken et al. showed already in 1995
that a difference in Hounsfield Units (HU) of at least 50 HU is needed to be able to
recognize liver lesions [1]. On the other hand, patients should not receive more CM than
necessarily, because of possible underlying physiological effects [2-4]. Although there has
been some controversy about this recently, there is no need to give patients more CM than
needed, because of increased costs, no quality improvement and their might still be a
relationship with contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) [5].
Recent publications suggested individualization of injection protocols that can be based on
either total body weight (TBW) or lean body weight (LBW) [6-9]. In the investigators
department an injection protocol based on TBW is currently used.
Besides the CM injection parameters, scanner parameters are of influence on the attenuation
as well. Because of recent technical developments it became possible to reach a good image
quality (IQ) at lower tube voltages [10]. When the x-ray output comes closer to the 33 keV
k-edge of Iodine, attenuation increases. In short, decreasing the tube voltage increases the
attenuation of iodine. Scanning at a lower tube voltage therefore gives rise to even lower CM
volumes. Lastly, it would be revolutionary to accomplish a liver enhancement that is
homogenous, sufficient for lesion detection and comparable between patients and in the same
patients, regardless of weight and scanner settings used.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 245 |
Est. completion date | June 26, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | June 26, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients referred for abdominal CT in portal venous phase - Patients = 18 years and competent to sign an informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Hemodynamic instability - Pregnancy - Renal insufficiency (defined as Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min/1,73m2 [Odin protocol 004720]) - Iodine allergy (Odin protocol 022199) - Age <18 years - Absence of informed consent |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Netherlands | MUMC+ | Maastricht | Limburg |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Maastricht University Medical Center |
Netherlands,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | A liver attenuation (? HU) | The attenuation of the liver parenchyma as assessed by measuring the Hounsfield units (HU) of the liver parenchyma in an unenhanced CT scan and a scan in portal venous phase. The difference between the enhanced and unenhanced CT scan is the ? HU. It is expected that scans in all groups have a ? HU of at least 50 HU, which is considered sufficient. Therefore it is a non-inferiority outcome. | Measurement for each scan is performed withing 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Objective image quality - signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio | The objective image quality parameters consist of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). SNR is calculated by dividing the attenuation of the liver parenchyma by the corresponding standard deviation (SD) of the attenuation. The attenuation of the left erector spinae muscle is measured at the level of the liver to calculate CNR using the following established formula: liver segment attenuation minus intramuscular attenuation, divided by the SD of the intramuscular attenuation. For both a higher number indicated a better image quality. The outcome should not be significantly different between groups. | Measurement for each scan is performed within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Subjective image quality - assessed with a 5-point Likert scale | Two experienced radiologists will assess the subjective image quality in consensus, while being blinded for the protocol used. A 5-point Likert scale is used, in which 1= excellent; 2= good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor. So a higher number is a worse outcome. The scale does not have a particular name. | Measurement for each scan is performed within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Radiation dose | The mean effective mAs (± SD), mean CTDIvol (mGy) (± SD) and the Mean DLP (mGy*cm) (± SD) are visible on screen and reported, to compare the difference in radiation dose between groups. A higher number means a higher radiation dose and is therefore a worse outcome. | Measurement for each scan is performed within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Weight | Patients weight (in kg) is assessed by using a weighting scale | Directly prior to the scan it is measured and data is collected within one month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Height (in m) | Patients height is asked | Directly prior to the scan it is measured and data is collected within one month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Contrast media volume | A dedicated data acquisition program (Certega Informatics Solution; Bayer) continuously monitors and collects all injection parameters (eg, total amount of CM [milliliter] and peak flow rate [milliliter per seconds]). A higher number means a higher radiation dose and is therefore a worse outcome. And results are compared between groups. | Data is retrieved from the system within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Needle size | A dedicated data acquisition program (Certega Informatics Solution; Bayer) continuously monitors and collects all injection parameters, among which needle size is one of the parameters. A smaller gauge of the needle could possibly mean that the desired flow rate is not possible. In general it is expected that the needle size used is not significantly different between groups. | Data is retrieved from the system within 1 month after the scan. It is finished when all patients are scanned. | |
Secondary | Needle placement | A dedicated data acquisition program (Certega Informatics Solution; Bayer) continuously monitors and collects all injection parameters, among which needle placement is one of the parameters. In general it is expected that the needle placement is not significantly different between groups. | Data is retrieved from the system within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | BMI | Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2 | Calculated after the scan, within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Sex | Is collected | Collected before the scan by the technician and retrieved from the system within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Age | Is collected | Collected before the scan by the technician and retrieved from the system within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Scan indication | Is collected | Collected before the scan by the technician and retrieved from the system within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Flow rate | A dedicated data acquisition program (Certega Informatics Solution; Bayer) continuously monitors and collects peak flow rate [milliliter per seconds]). | Data is retrieved from the system within 1 month after the scan. | |
Secondary | Concentration of the contrast media | All patients receive the identical contrast media concentration as used in daily clinical routine; 300 mg/ml | Data is retrieved from the system within 1 month after the scan. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04085861 -
Mental Health in Dancers; an Intervention Study
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02558920 -
Meta-analyses of Food Sources of Fructose-Containing Sugars and Obesity
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06026631 -
Lipidomic Characterization in Non-metastatic Breast Cancer Women Undergoing Surgery: a Pilot Study.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03850990 -
Effect of Gut-Cued Eating on BMI and Efficacy of Open-Label Placebo to Augment Weight Loss
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03601273 -
Bariatric Embolization Trial for the Obese Nonsurgical
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02899559 -
Messages and Plans to Increase Gym Utilization
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02557022 -
Meta Analysis of the Effect of a Low Glycemic Index Diet and Glycemic Load on Body Weight
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02188251 -
A Study Investigating the Effects of Activamp on Body Weight, Fat Loss, and Metabolic Markers in Healthy Overweight Participants
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02158130 -
Effects of Aerobic Exercise Detraining
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02402985 -
Comparison of a Plant Protein Diet to a Animal Protein Diet Emphasized in Type 2 Diabetics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01665339 -
Preload, Weight Management, Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01131871 -
Innovative Approaches to Diet, Exercise and Activity
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01170390 -
Oral Contraceptives and Body Mass Index
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02395835 -
Methylation of the PPARg Promoter Region in Pregnancy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00814554 -
Effectiveness Evaluation of Three Strategies of Promotion of Healthy Dietary and Physical Activity Behaviours to Prevent Weight Excess Among Teenagers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04901949 -
The Course of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With Different BMI Groups
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03843424 -
Treatment Efforts Addressing Child Weight Management by Unifying Patients, Parents & Providers
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03575897 -
Serial Assessment of Body Fat Accrual in Very Preterm Infants
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05601804 -
TARGETing Healthy Weight Loss in the Context of Food Insecurity
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05004558 -
Effects of Remote-based Resistance Training on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Cognitive Function, and Quality of Life in Adults Living With Alzheimer's Disease and/or Related Dementias
|
N/A |