Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT01828749 |
Other study ID # |
02-13-19E |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 2013 |
Est. completion date |
March 2015 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2015 |
Source |
Wake Forest University Health Sciences |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Abdominopelvic CT (CTap) utilization rose significantly in blunt trauma patients over the
last decade. However, the observed increases failed to reduce mortality or missed injury
rates. Several investigators have derived (citation) and validated (citation) clinical
decision rules that attempt to identify a subset of low risk pediatric and adult patients in
whom abdominopelvic CT imaging can be safely eliminated. Thus far these efforts failed to
significantly reduce utilization. The investigators propose an alternative and complimentary
strategy to decrease radiation by selectively eliminating the pelvic imaging portion of the
abdominopelvic CT in low risk patients. In stable, alert patients without clinically evidence
of pelvis or hip fractures, abdominal CT imaging alone (diaphragm to iliac crest) identifies
clinically significant intra-abdominal injury (cs-IAI) as accurately as routine
abdominopelvic imaging (diaphragm to greater trochanter) and results in a clinically
important decrease in radiation exposure. The study will investigate this by comparing the
accuracy of an imaging protocol using CT abdomen alone versus CT abdomen and pelvis to detect
cs-IAI among stable, blunt trauma patients without suspected pelvis or hip fractures in two
age groups: ages 3-17 years and 18-60. Patients will undergo CT imaging as deemed clinically
indicated by the treating clinician. Among those who have abdominopelvic CT scans, the study
will determine the test characteristics of CT abdomen alone versus CT abdomen plus CT pelvis
imaging for the identification of cs-IAI. The reference standard will include initial
radiology reports, with structured follow up of indeterminate scans, operative reports, and
7-day medical record review.
Description:
Abdominopelvic computed tomography (CTap) utilization rose significantly in blunt trauma
patients over the last decade but failed to reduce mortality or missed injury rates.
Primary Hypothesis: In stable, alert patients (GCS > 14) without clinically evident fractures
of the pelvis, hip or lumbar spine, CT abdomen (CTa) alone (diaphragm to iliac crest)
identifies intra-abdominal injury (IAI) with an accuracy that is not inferior to routine CTap
(diaphragm to greater trochanter) with a clinically relevant reduction in radiation exposure.
Primary Aim: Compare the accuracy of CTa alone versus CTap to detect IAI in two age groups:
ages 3-17 years and 18-60 years. Blunt trauma patients requiring CTap will be enrolled. Data
obtained prior to CT imaging include demographics, injury mechanism, exam and pelvic
radiograph findings and FAST results from the trauma evaluation. The original CTap will be
digitally reformatted to create matched pairs of de-identified CTa and CTap studies. A board
certified study radiologist, blinded to the original CT and clinical outcome, will interpret
the CTa studies in injured patients. McNemar's chi-square test will be used to evaluate the
null hypothesis for injuries in matched pairs assuming no difference for uninjured patients.
Te the test characteristics of the CTa versus CTap will be determined. The reference standard
will include initial radiology reports, operative reports, and 7-day medical record review.
If the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in the performance
(accuracy) of CTap and CTa alone is less than 3%, the conclusion will be that CTa alone is
not inferior to CTap to diagnose IAI. Secondary Aims: The mean effective doses of radiation
will be calculated and compared with reductions up to 50% expected. The study will determine
if physicians' pretest probability accurately identifies clinically significant pelvis, hip
and lumbar spine fractures (CTp indications) in two age groups: ages 3-17 years and 18-60
years. Using a gestalt pretest probability of ≤ 2% as "negative for injury", and a pretest
probability > 2% as "positive for injury", the test characteristics of physician estimation
will be determined. The test characteristics and interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa
statistic) of exam findings expected to predict fractures of the pelvis, hip and lumbar spine
will be reported separately.