Bacterial Pneumonia Clinical Trial
— RESTORE-IMI 2Official title:
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (MK-7655A) Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Subjects With Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Verified date | March 2020 |
Source | Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study aims to compare treatment with a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of imipenem/relebactam/cilastatin (IMI/REL) with a FDC of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) in participants with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP or VAPB, respectively). The primary hypothesis is that IMI/REL is non-inferior to PIP/TAZ in the incidence rate of all-cause mortality.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 537 |
Est. completion date | April 3, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | April 3, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Requires treatment with IV antibiotic therapy for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) - Fulfills clinical and radiographic criteria, with onset of criteria occurring after more than 48 hours of hospitalization or within 7 days after discharge from a hospital (for HABP); or at least 48 hours after mechanical ventilation (for VABP) - Has an adequate baseline lower respiratory tract specimen obtained for Gram stain and culture - Has an infection known or thought to be caused by microorganisms susceptible to the IV study therapy - Agrees to allow any bacterial isolates obtained from protocol-required specimens related to the current infection to be provided to the Central Microbiology Reference Laboratory for study-related microbiological testing, long term storage, and other future testing - Is not of reproductive potential; or if of reproductive potential agrees to avoid impregnating a partner or avoid becoming pregnant, by practicing abstinence or using acceptable contraception Exclusion Criteria: - Has a baseline lower respiratory tract specimen Gram stain that shows the presence of Gram-positive cocci only - Has confirmed or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) - Has confirmed or suspected pneumonia of viral, fungal or parasitic origin - Has HABP/VABP caused by an obstructive process, including lung cancer or other known obstruction - Has a carcinoid tumor or carcinoid syndrome - Has active immunosuppression defined as either receiving immunosuppressive medications or having a medical condition associated with immunodeficiency - Is expected to survive for less than 72 hours - Has a concurrent condition or infection that would preclude evaluation of therapeutic response - Has received effective antibacterial drug therapy for the index infection of HABP/VABP for more than 24 hours continuously, during the previous 72 hours - Has a history of serious allergy, hypersensitivity or a serious reaction to any penicillin or beta-lactamase inhibitors - Female is pregnant, expecting to conceive, is breastfeeding or plans to breastfeed - Has a history of seizure disorder requiring ongoing prior treatment with anti-convulsive therapy within the last 3 years - Anticipates treatment with the following: valproic acid or divalproex sodium, serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, or serotonin receptor antagonists, meperidine, buspirone, concomitant systemic antibacterial agents, antifungal or antiviral therapy for the index infection of HABP/VABP - Is currently undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis - Is currently participating in, has participated in during the previous 30 days, or anticipates to participate in any other clinical study involving the administration of experimental medication - Has previously participated in this study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality (ACM) Through Day 28 in the Modified Intention-to-treat (MITT) Population | The percentage of participants in the MITT population with mortality due to any cause from randomization through Day 28 was determined for each arm. | Up to 28 days | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the MITT Population With a Favorable Clinical Response (FCR) at Early Follow-up (EFU) Visit | The percentage of participants with a FCR at EFU was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at EFU was defined as either "sustained cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] with no evidence of resurgence and no additional antibiotics are required) or "cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] and no additional antibiotics are required). | Up to 16 days after end of therapy (up to 30 days) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With =1 Adverse Event (AE) | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. | Up to 30 days | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Therapy Due to an AE | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. | Up to 14 days | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ACM in the Microbiological Modified Intention-to-treat (mMITT) Population | The percentage of participants in the mMITT population with mortality due to any cause from randomization through Day 28 was determined for each arm. | Up to 28 days | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ACM at EFU in the MITT Population | The percentage of participants in the MITT population with mortality due to any cause from randomization through EFU was determined for each arm. | Up to 16 days after end of therapy (up to 30 days) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ACM at EFU in the mMITT Population | The percentage of participants in the mMITT population with mortality due to any cause from randomization through EFU was determined for each arm. | Up to 16 days after end of therapy (up to 30 days) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population With a FCR at On-therapy Visit 1 (OTX1) [Day 3] | The percentage of participants with a FCR at OTX1 was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at OTX1 was defined as "improved" (majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"]). | Day 3 (OTX1) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the CE Population With a FCR at OTX2 (Day 6) | The percentage of participants with a FCR at OTX2 was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at OTX2 was defined as "improved" (majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"]). | Day 6 (OTX2) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the CE Population With a FCR at OTX3 (Day 10) | The percentage of participants with a FCR at OTX3 was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at OTX3 was defined as "improved" (majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"]). | Day 10 (OTX3) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the CE Population With a FCR at EOT Visit | The percentage of participants with a FCR at EOT was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at EOT was defined as either "cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] and no additional antibiotics are required) or "improved" (the majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] and no additional antibiotics are required). | From Day 7 to Day 14 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the CE Population With a FCR at Day 28 | The percentage of participants with a FCR at Day 28 was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at Day 28 was defined as either "sustained cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] with no evidence of resurgence and no additional antibiotics are required) or "cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] and no additional antibiotics are required). | Day 28 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the CE Population With a FCR at EFU Visit | The percentage of participants with a FCR at EFU was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at EFU was defined as either "sustained cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] with no evidence of resurgence and no additional antibiotics are required) or "cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] and no additional antibiotics are required). | Up to 16 days after end of therapy (up to Day 30) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the MITT Population With a FCR at OTX1 (Day 3) | The percentage of participants with a FCR at OTX1 was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at OTX1 was defined as "improved" (majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"]). | Day 3 (OTX1) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the MITT Population With a FCR at OTX2 (Day 6) | The percentage of participants with a FCR at OTX2 was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at OTX2 was defined as "improved" (majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"]). | Day 6 (OTX2) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the MITT Population With a FCR at OTX3 (Day 10) | The percentage of participants with a FCR at OTX3 was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at OTX3 was defined as "improved" (majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"]). | Day 10 (OTX3) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the MITT Population With a FCR at EOT | The percentage of participants with a FCR at EOT was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at EOT was defined as either "cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] and no additional antibiotics are required) or "improved" (the majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] and no additional antibiotics are required). | From Day 7 to Day 14 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the MITT Population With a FCR at Day 28 | The percentage of participants with a FCR at Day 28 was determined for each arm. Favorable clinical response at Day 28 was defined as either "sustained cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] with no evidence of resurgence and no additional antibiotics are required) or "cure" (all pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved [or returned to "pre-infection status"] and no additional antibiotics are required). | Day 28 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the mMITT Population With a Favorable Microbiological Response (FMR) at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit | The percentage of participants with a FMR at EOT was determined for each arm. Favorable microbiological response at EOT was defined as either "eradication" (a lower respiratory tract culture taken at EOT showing eradication of baseline pathogen) or "presumed eradication" (no specimen collected because the participant deemed clinically cured or improved). | From Day 7 to Day 14 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the mMITT Population With a FMR at EFU Visit | The percentage of participants with a FMR at EFU was determined for each arm. Favorable microbiological response at EOT was defined as either "eradication" (a lower respiratory tract culture taken at EFU showing eradication of baseline pathogen) or "presumed eradication" (no specimen collected because the participant deemed clinically cured or improved). | Up to 16 days after end of therapy (up to Day 30) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population With a FMR at EOT Visit | The percentage of participants with a FMR at EOT was determined for each arm. Favorable microbiological response at EOT was defined as either "eradication" (a lower respiratory tract culture taken at EOT showing eradication of baseline pathogen) or "presumed eradication" (no specimen collected because the participant deemed clinically cured or improved). | From Day 7 to Day 14 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in the ME Population With a FMR at EFU Visit | The percentage of participants with a FMR at EOT was determined for each arm. Favorable microbiological response at EOT was defined as either "eradication" (a lower respiratory tract culture taken at EOT showing eradication of baseline pathogen) or "presumed eradication" (no specimen collected because the participant deemed clinically cured or improved). | Up to 16 days after end of therapy (up to Day 30) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT01570192 -
Clinical Trials to Reduce the Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04952337 -
Clinical, Molecular and Functional Biomarkers for PROgnosis, Pathomechanisms and Treatment Strategies of COVID-19 (PROVID) - (PROVID-CAPNETZ)
|
||
Completed |
NCT02531438 -
Omadacycline vs Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of CABP (EudraCT #2013-004071-13)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00079885 -
Study Evaluating Tigecycline vs Levofloxacin in Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05629741 -
A 2-Part First-in-Human Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of CMTX-101
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05417997 -
Effect of Kunamin in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Positive Covid-19 Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00645619 -
Use of TREM-1 Protein to Differentiate Viral and Bacterial Pneumonias in Intubated Children
|
||
Completed |
NCT00509106 -
Comparative Study of Ceftaroline vs. Ceftriaxone in Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00080496 -
Study Evaluating Tigecycline Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03158727 -
Cx611-0204 SEPCELL Study
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00621504 -
Comparative Study of Ceftaroline vs. Ceftriaxone in Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00124020 -
Comparison of Telavancin and Vancomycin for Hospital-acquired Pneumonia Due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00081575 -
Study Comparing Tigecycline vs. Levofloxacin in Subjects Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00451386 -
Ertapenem Study in Pediatric Patients Who Have Urinary Tract Infections, Skin Infections or Community-acquired Pneumonia (0826-036)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03752320 -
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Postoperative Pneumonia After Thoracic Surgery
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04779242 -
Omadacycline vs. Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00763620 -
Assessment of the Diagnostic Capacity of the Mini-broncho Alveolar Lavage Performed Through a Suction Catheter
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00107952 -
Comparison of Telavancin and Vancomycin for Hospital-acquired Pneumonia Due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03862040 -
Cefiderocol Concentrations in the Lungs of Hospitalized Patients With Bacterial Pneumonia
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05531149 -
Efficacy and Safety of Trimodulin (BT588) in Subjects With CAP Including COVID-19 Pneumonia
|
Phase 3 |