View clinical trials related to Bacterial Infection.
Filter by:This is a Phase 1, single center study to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of three dose-level groups of WCK 6777 (ERT and ZID combination), and two dose-level groups of ERT alone and ZID (WCK 5107) alone in 52 healthy adult male and female subjects aged 18 to 45 years old (both inclusive). Seven treatment cohorts will be evaluated in this study. WCK 6777 will be evaluated in three cohorts - Cohorts 1, 4 and 7- of 8 subjects each (6 study drug combinations and 2 placebos); ERT will be evaluated alone in two cohorts - Cohorts 2 and 5- of 8 subject each (6 ERT and 2 placebos); and ZID will be evaluated in two cohorts, Cohorts 3 and 6, of 6 subjects each (all ZID). The study will be placebo-controlled and double-blinded in all cohorts except Cohorts 3 and 6. No placebo subjects are included in standalone ZID cohorts, since adequate safety data for higher doses of ZID alone in comparison with placebo are available from completed Phase 1 studies of WCK 5107 (ZID) alone and the ZID-only arms of WCK 5222 (cefepime + ZID) studies. The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of three dose-escalating regimens of WCK 6777 ( ERT and ZID combination) and two-dose escalating regimens of standalone ERT or ZID following single daily doses for 7 days in healthy adult subjects.
Bacterial infections in people who inject psychoactive substances
This is a Phase I, open-label, non-randomized, single center study in 48 healthy adult male and female subjects, aged 18 to 45 years. This study is aimed to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam (AVYCAZ) combined with aztreonam (ATM), AVYCAZ alone, and ATM alone. The study will have 6 arms, arms 1-4 are the single drug administration treatment groups and will include AVYCAZ per label dosing, AVYCAZ as a continuous infusion (CI), ATM per label dosing, and ATM as a CI. Arms 5 and 6 are the two AVYCAZ and ATM combination drug administration treatment groups. The duration of subject participation will be up to 44 days, and the total length of the study will be 15 months. The primary objective of this study is to describe the safety of two dosing regimens of AVYCAZ combined with ATM relative to AVYCAZ alone, and ATM alone in healthy adult subjects.
This is a Phase 1, open-label, multiple-dose trial conducted at a single center. The treatment period will consist of three 6 g doses (18 g) of ZTI-01 as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion (+10 minute window). A total of 30 enrolled subjects will be randomized to undergo a single standardized bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at one of five sampling times. A total of 6 subjects will be assigned to each BAL-sampling time. Up to ten additional enrolled subjects will act as alternates to obtain 30 evaluable subjects. An evaluable subject is defined as a subject who receives all doses of ZTI-01, undergoes BAL at the randomized sampling timepoint with BAL return volume adequate for testing, and undergoes at least the one blood sampling timepoint that is concurrent with the assigned BAL sampling timepoint, with blood sampling volume that is adequate for testing. The objectives of the study are to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) for a multiple dose regimen of IV-infused ZTI-01.
This is a Phase IV, multi-center open-label pharmacokinetic trial studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of Minocin IV. Up to 67 subjects will be enrolled to obtain 50 evaluable, ICU patients who are already receiving antimicrobial therapy for a known or suspected Gram-negative infection. The entire study duration will be approximately 16 months and each subject participation duration will be approximately 2 days. The study will be conducted at approximately 13 clinical sites. Each subject will receive a single 200 mg dose of Minocin IV infused over approximately 60 minutes. Each subject will have 7 PK samples collected (1 pre-dose, 6 post-dose) at designated time points over a ~48 hour period following the start of the Minocin IV infusion. The primary objectives are: 1) To characterize minocycline PK at the population level in critically-ill adults, with illness known or suspected to be caused by infection with Gram-negative bacteria and 2) To assess patient-level and clinical covariates associated with minocycline pharmacokinetic properties in critically-ill adults, with illness known or suspected to be caused by infection with Gram-negative bacteria.
The delayed administration of an adequate antimicrobial therapy is a strong predictor of impaired outcome in patients with bacterial sepsis. Therefore, the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (2016) recommend that administration of intravenous antimicrobials be initiated within one hour following the recognition of sepsis or septic shock. The quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is a new bedside tool which has been recently proposed by the Third International Sepsis Consensus Definitions Task Force (Sepsis-3) to identify patients with suspected infection who are at greater risk for a poor outcome outside the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It uses three criteria, assigning one point for low systolic blood pressure (SBP ≤100 mmHg), high respiratory rate (≥22 breaths per min) and altered mentation (Glasgow coma scale <15). The score ranges from 0 to 3 points. A qSOFA value ≥2 points is associated with a greater risk of death or prolonged ICU stay, these outcomes being more common in infected patients who may be septic than in those with uncomplicated infection. The definite goal of qSOFA is to hasten the management and thus improve the outcome of patients at risk of sepsis or septic shock. Many patients admitted to the hospital for bacterial sepsis or septic shock are initially managed in the Emergency Department (ED). This study aims at investigating whether the routine calculation of qSOFA at patient triage may hasten the initiation of antimicrobial therapy in patients admitted to the ED with suspected or proven bacterial infection, especially in those with subsequent criteria for sepsis or septic shock (Sepsis-3 definition).
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100) is safe in the treatment of dialysis patients with bacteremia.
- NSAIDs are widely consumed, and some are currently available for self-medication with indications 'Pain and Fever' (Cavalié, National Agency for Drug Safety (ANSM), 2014) - There is no recommendation to limit their use in bacterial infections except for chicken pox in children. - To date, no study has highlighted the aggravating role of exposure to NSAIDs on bacterial infections in adults, based on the usual septic severity Levy's score (SSS), and mortality, but it delays adequate antibiotics (Legras, Critical Care, 2009) - Community-acquired bacterial infections in adults exposed to NSAIDs are serious by their spread (multiple locations), and suppurative character requiring frequent use of invasive procedures such as surgery or drainage. The SSS does not reflect the seriousness of these infections. They are frequently associated with use of ibuprofen (63.4%), and self-medication practices (65.5%). The main hypothesis is that NSAIDs exposure is associated with a specific severity of community-acquired bacterial infection, marked by dissemination, suppurative complications or even invasive procedures requirement. Our objectives are also to: - Describe what NSAID use terms are associated to the risk of serious bacterial infections: molecule, dosage, duration of exposure, access (prescription or self-medication), associated drugs. - To determine what type (s) (s) of bacterial infection is worsened by exposure to NSAIDs. - To determine if other risk factors contribute to severity of bacterial community acquired infection - To describe hospital costs associated to such severity of bacterial infection
Surgical site infections are an important health indicator for hospitals and a significant medico-economic issue. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of chlorhexidine mouthwash performed before surgery on the bacterial colonization of the pharyngeal mucosa.
The main objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability (sensitivity and specificity) of standard bacteriological analysis made from one or other of the two sampling processing techniques and perioperative management of samples : the Ultra Turrax method that uses grinding versus the standard method.