View clinical trials related to Back Pain.
Filter by:Chronic low back pain is a public health problem, and there is strong evidence that it is associated with a complex interaction of biopsychosocial factors. Cognitive functional therapy (CFT) is a promising new intervention that deals with potentially modifiable multidimensional aspects of pain (eg, provocative cognitive, movement and lifestyle behaviors). In order to better understand the contextual effects, the aim of the current study is to investigate the efficacy of CFT compared with a sham-intervention for pain intensity and disability post-intervention in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in which 152 (18 - 60 years old) patients with CLBP will be enrolled. The patients will be randomly allocated to receive: (1) CFT intervention or (2) sham-intervention. The experimental group will receive individualized CFT in a pragmatic manner (5 to 7 sessions) based on the clinical progression of participants. The sham group will attend six sessions: consisted of 30 minutes of photobiomodulation using a detuned device and more 15 minutes of talking about neutral topics. Participants will be assessed pre and post-intervention, three months and six months after randomization. Patients from both groups also will receive an educational booklet. The primary outcomes will be pain intensity and disability post-intervention. The secondary outcomes will be: pain intensity and disability at 3- and 6-month follow-up, as well as self-efficacy, global perceived effect of improvement and functioning post-intervention, 3- and 6-month follow-up. The patients and the assessor will be blinded to treatment administered (active vs. sham). The between-group differences (effects of treatment) and their respective 95% confidence intervals will be calculated by constructing linear mixed models. Treatment effect for the primary and secondary outcomes will be estimated using mixed linear models. To the best of our knowledge, the current study will be the first to compare CFT vs. sham intervention. Sham-controlled RCTs may help to understand the influence of non-specific factors on treatment outcomes. Considering complex interventions as CFT, it is imperative to understand the impact of contextual factors on outcomes.
The relationship between arthroplasty and low back pain in orthopedists will be evaluated.
The effect of transauricular electrical vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) will be studied on temporal summation of heat pain (TSP) in 30 patients with chronic low-back pain and in 30 heathy volunteers. Participants will receive either taVNS or sham stimulation before and during TSP induction in a randomized crossover manner. The participants will be unaware regarding the type of intervention.
To investigate whether different clinical, psychophysical and neurophysiological phenotypes can be identified among low back pain patients
Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of instrument-based mobilization compared with manual mobilization in patients with non-specific low back pain (NLBP), in terms of spinal muscle activation, decrease in pain, and improvement in range of motion (ROM). Design: Randomized clinical trial, double blind. Participants and interventions: A total of 66 participants with localized NLBP will be divided into 2 groups matched for sex, age, and body mass index. The intervention group will receive central postero-anterior mobilization with a force of 150 N through physiotherapy instrument mobilization at the level of pain in the lumbar spine. The control group will receive central postero-anterior grade III mobilization through the pisiform grip method at the level of pain in the lumbar spine. Main outcome measures: Measurements will be taken before the intervention, after the 1st session, after the 6th session, and at 4 weeks follow-up. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging will be done to identify lumbar multifidus (LM) activation through the measurement of muscle thickness at the level of L5-L4 vertebrae, during rest and lower-extremity movement. Each participant will self-rate the pain intensity in the lumbar spine according to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The pressure-pain threshold (PPT) will be measured using an algometer. Lumbar ROM will be measured using a dual inclinometer method in flexion and extension. The results will be compared between the intervention and control groups through mixed analysis of variance for LM thickness, lumbar ROM, PPT, and NPRS.
Low back pain is the leading course of disability , affecting patients' health and work. Recently, studies have reveal the fact that patients get insufficient physical activity and easily let acute stage turn to chronic type. Although acupuncture for low back pain is worldwide popular, the mechanism of single acupoint for low back pain is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is the investigators choose the most frequent used acupoint and modified single acupoint method to assess the efficacy of single acupoint to acute low back pain.
The study involves investigating phenotypic changes (ie metabolic activity in brain pain matrix areas, metabolic activity and textural analysis of multifidus muscle) following multifidus stimulation and establishing relationship with the change in pain, functionality and quality of life.
The objective of this study is to investigate and utilize spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as an effective approach to eliciting weight loss and potentially alleviating Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), as evidenced by increasing metabolism of adipose tissue.
Transversus abdominis (TrA) is an important muscle for spinal stabilization. Abdominal draw-in maneuver (ADIM) is a method that selectively activates TrA without activating external oblique (EO) and internal oblique (IO) muscles. Individuals with low back pain may have some troubles to understand proper contraction of TrA. Therefore, to contract the TrA, two different feedback techniques have been used to instruct. In this observational study we aim to investigate the effects of two different biofeedback methods to teach patients the proper activation of TrA muscle using ADIM. We aim to find out the differences between visual and traditional tactile biofeedback and decide which one is practical and easy to teach the patients in clinical environment.
The goal of this study is to investigate how different painful stimuli are processed and modulated in the nervous system. In various pain conditions, including low back pain, often no specific source can be identified as the cause of the pain. Scientific findings point towards a possible involvement of sensitization processes in the central nervous system (spinal cord and brain) that can contribute to the development and persistence of chronic pain. There is a need for reliable and well established experimental methods to better investigate and understand these processes. Frequently used methods comprise the application of thermal, mechanical or electrical stimulations. These modalities are processed in different parts of the nervous system, each allowing its own conclusions. This can be an advantage, but it also poses a challenge regarding comparability and generalizability of obtained results. This study aims to apply and compare various experimental methods in people without and people with low back pain and shed light on the methodological differences. In the future, this could enable better identification and characterization of sensitization processes in the nervous system and build the basis for individually adapted, mechanism-targeted treatments with better patient outcomes.